What about naming the collection "tuning"? Robby
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Vincent St-Amour <[email protected]> wrote: > I would prefer the full word, "performance". > > But with a name like that, I would expect things from > `racket/unsafe/ops' and `racket/performance-hint' to be there. "Tuning" > doesn't carry the same expectation (to me, at least). > > Vincent > > > > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0500, > Robby Findler wrote: >> >> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer >> and perf/optimization-coach/ ? >> >> Robby >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > (Performance) tuning? >> > >> > Vincent >> > >> > >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500, >> > Robby Findler wrote: >> >> >> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like >> >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long? >> >> >> >> Robby >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400, >> >> > Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things? >> >> > >> >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly >> >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR), >> >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect. >> >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection. >> >> > >> >> > Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
