Would "tuning" work? And can you say more about how the whackers made this distinction? Is the issues that optimizing things doesn't always improve performance... maybe?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Keep in mind that we were whacked for using 'performance' when we really > meant 'optimization'. > > I kind of like the 'tools' idea. I can see that it is too broad (a spell > checking tool shouldn't co-habit with a visualizer for futures) but a tools > collections with sub-collections for various things sounds good to me: > > tools/ > stepper/ > macro-stepper > optimizations/ > future-visualuzation/ > editing/ > > and so on would work. > _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
