+1 Vincent
At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:04:11 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > > What about naming the collection "tuning"? > > Robby > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: > > I would prefer the full word, "performance". > > > > But with a name like that, I would expect things from > > `racket/unsafe/ops' and `racket/performance-hint' to be there. "Tuning" > > doesn't carry the same expectation (to me, at least). > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:39:53 -0500, > > Robby Findler wrote: > >> > >> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer > >> and perf/optimization-coach/ ? > >> > >> Robby > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> > >> wrote: > >> > (Performance) tuning? > >> > > >> > Vincent > >> > > >> > > >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500, > >> > Robby Findler wrote: > >> >> > >> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like > >> >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long? > >> >> > >> >> Robby > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour > >> >> <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > >> >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400, > >> >> > Eli Barzilay wrote: > >> >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things? > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly > >> >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just > >> >> > TR), > >> >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect. > >> >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection. > >> >> > > >> >> > Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev