On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > To start afresh, here are two suggestions, which are mutually > exclusive. The first is my preference: > > 1. Revert the addition of `compatibility/package' and > `compatibility/mpair', including the documentation changes (but > maybe add back some text to discourage misuse of these libraries).
I definitely think we should keep `mpair` as a more-than-compatibility library. It's useful in real data structures, and it's nice not to have to roll your own mutable linked list when it's the right choice. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
