backwards compatibility does not mean you must have a substitute. Your concerns should be registered however for future attempts to deprecate this feature -- if it is used.
On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > 20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> I think the idea is that "compatibility" means "we are keeping this >> to be backwards compatible with unknown code that is using it" (or >> at least, that's one of the meanings). > > Sounds like `scheme/nest' should be there too then. But in any case, > what bugs me about putting `*/package' there is that there's no > substitute for it, so labeling it as such seems wrong. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
