20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> I think the idea is that "compatibility" means "we are keeping this
> to be backwards compatible with unknown code that is using it" (or
> at least, that's one of the meanings).
Sounds like `scheme/nest' should be there too then. But in any case,
what bugs me about putting `*/package' there is that there's no
substitute for it, so labeling it as such seems wrong.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
