My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. So now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc isn’t where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\frameworks\projects\Language\target)
[1] https://paste.apache.org/fb3I ________________________________ From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Repos and Releases Actually, it was: cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder ant -f antscripts.xml setup I have updated the wiki to reflect this. I was able to import the jsonly SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors. I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next. -Alex On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link made it >>clear to me what the topic was about… >> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with ant >>all. >> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran into >>some trouble. >> >> >> 1. The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g. stringAttribute >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION" >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure if >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed to >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the >>explicit path. > >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating. I think you have to >do: > >cd ide/flashbuilder >ant -f antscripts.xml > >Before importing the external tools. > > >> 2. Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] discussion I >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, but >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log. > >It is still on my list to try to fix this. >> >> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we can >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and AIR so >>I’m guessing it needs flash. > >The JSOnly package should work in FB. I'll try it again and see why it >failed. > >-Alex >> >>Thanks. >> >> >>[1] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle >>x >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart >>i >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d >>5 >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710& >>s >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0 >>[2] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>o >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&data=02%7C01%7Caharui >>% >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>7 >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata=Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB >>R >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0 >>[3] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >>e >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL-Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0 >>- >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48 >>c >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885 >>2 >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P7xw%3D&reserved=0 >>[4] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap >>a >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708 >>d >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710 >>& >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> >> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >> >> >> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some naïve >>>questions: >>> >>> >>> 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged into >>>royale-asjs? >> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 repos >>into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). >> >>> 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said repos? >> >>It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and run >>"ant >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run "ant >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it doesn't >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. Of >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. >> >>> 3. “Folks should have noticed that the >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder? >> >>royale-asjs >> >>> 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from modified >>>source update this (3) folder? >> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source package >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 >>repos after building everything. So if changes are detected today, they >>should be in this package too. >> >>HTH, >>-Alex >>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos into >>>a >>>single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days have >>>been >>>churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>package. >>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute bits >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should >>>review >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that need >>>improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the >>>scripts, we should get going on that now. >>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want to >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. My >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source >>>packages >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release >>>script >>>in those packages. >>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome, >>>-Alex >>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks >>>>good >>>>till now. >>>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant build >>>>for >>>>a >>>>while. >>>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr >>>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop branch >>>>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way first, >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the >>>>>compiler. >>>>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI >>>>>servers >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows (the >>>>>CI >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). >>>>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename >>>>>before >>>>> the merge to develop. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a >>>>>clean >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders and >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the >>>>>various >>>>> READMEs first. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >Hi Alex, >>>>> > >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not sure >>>>> >whether >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check >>>>>whether >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you >>>>>mean >>>>>by >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it by >>>>>maven >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. >>>>> > >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything >>>>>looks >>>>>ok. >>>>> > >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all >>>>>modules >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably it >>>>>should >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. >>>>> > >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>>> > >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >>>>> > >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to >>>>>download >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should >>>>>describe >>>>> >>what >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order to >>>>>have >>>>> >>SWF >>>>> >> output. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary package" - >>>>>It >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex project. >>>>>I >>>>> >>believe >>>>> >> there could be more people like me. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post... >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the >>>>>nightly >>>>> >>>for >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not SWF >>>>> >>>output. >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) >>>>>bundle >>>>> >>>the >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF output. >>>>>The >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe bits >>>>>after >>>>> >>> you download them. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the >>>>>source >>>>>zip >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos (royals-compiler, >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the >>>>>JSOnly >>>>> >>>binary >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" nightly >>>>>but >>>>>in >>>>> >>>a >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash Builder >>>>>and >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again require >>>>> >>>running an >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially something >>>>>you >>>>> >>>choose >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure how, >>>>>under >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of >>>>>the >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the results >>>>>of >>>>>a >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create some >>>>>sort >>>>> >>>of >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven users >>>>>you >>>>> >>>choose >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by default >>>>>for >>>>>the >>>>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't >>>>>have >>>>> >>>them, >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> HTH, >>>>> >>> -Alex >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>>>> >>>Muppirala" >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package [1] >>>>>and >>>>> >>>have >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >[1] >>>>> >>> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%<https://n >>>>>>a >>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt >>>>>>p >>>>>>s://na0> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the npm >>>>>package >>>>> >>> >right? >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >Thanks, >>>>> >>> >Om >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>> > >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om, >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading one >>>>>zip >>>>> >>>file >>>>> >>> >and >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE. >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks, >>>>> >>> >> Om >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package all >>>>>the >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>>>> >>> >> > Om >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the better. >>>>>The >>>>> >>> >> decisions >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as >>>>>possible >>>>> >>>and >>>>> >>> >>make >>>>> >>> >> > our >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release >>>>>often. >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote: >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your >>>>>merge. >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Patreon: >>>>> >>* >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>>a >>>>>t >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>>>>>6 >>>>>>>4 >>>>>>>8 >>>>>>>14 >>>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>>>>>& >>>>>>>r >>>>>>>e >>>>>>>se >>>>> >>rved=0 >>>>> >> >>>>> >>< >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>>a >>>>>t >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>>>>>6 >>>>>>>4 >>>>>>>8 >>>>>>>14 >>>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>>>>>& >>>>>>>r >>>>>>>e >>>>>>>se >>>>> >>rved=0>* >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >-- >>>>> > >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> > >>>>> >Patreon: >>>>> >* >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>>a >>>>>t >>>>>r >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>>>>1 >>>>>>4 >>>>>>1 >>>>>>58 >>>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>>>>e >>>>>>r >>>>>>v >>>>>>ed >>>>> >=0 >>>>> >< >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>>a >>>>>t >>>>>r >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>>>>1 >>>>>>4 >>>>>>1 >>>>>>58 >>>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>>>>e >>>>>>r >>>>>>v >>>>>>ed >>>>> >=0>* >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
