Hi Carlos, Try to build first following projects: compiler-jburg-types and compiler-build-tools. For Maven there were no crucial changes, everything working as it was.
Let me know if it's helped. Thanks, Piotr 2017-12-12 10:50 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > Hi Alex, > > for NPM, I think we should bake it in the package. I think NPM is very > important right now to get the most easy and quick install and use for > newcomers, and that's what we're pursuing. > > In the other hand, as Yshay, I'm trying to check what is done, and right > now I'm syncing "develop" (for the three repos) > > Running "mvn clean install -DskipTests" in compiler, gives me: > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]* > > [*ERROR*] > > [*ERROR*] The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT > (/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml) > has 1 error > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in > apache-plugins-snapshots ( > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots) -> *[Help > 2]* > > [*ERROR*] > > [*ERROR*] The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT > (/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml) > has 1 error > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in > apache-plugins-snapshots ( > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots) -> *[Help > 2]* > > [*ERROR*] > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the > *-e* switch. > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging. > > [*ERROR*] > > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, > please read the following articles: > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]* > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]* > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException > > So, this means now, I only need to run that commando in asjs repo? > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > > 2017-12-12 9:15 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > > > > > On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some naïve > > >questions: > > > > > > > > > 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged into > > >royale-asjs? > > > > The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 repos > > into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, > > royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). > > > > > 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said repos? > > > > It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and run > "ant > > all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run "ant > > all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it doesn't > > clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. Of > > course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. > > > > > 3. “Folks should have noticed that the > > >IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > > >package.” What’s the path to that folder? > > > > royale-asjs > > > > > 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the > > >framework, in other words will re-building the framework from modified > > >source update this (3) folder? > > > > I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source package > > really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the > > binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 > > repos after building everything. So if changes are detected today, they > > should be in this package too. > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > > >Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM > > >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > > > > > >I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos into > a > > >single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days have > been > > >churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the > > >IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > > >package. > > > > > >I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute bits > > >on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should > review > > >the package to see if they like it or not and report things that need > > >improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the > > >scripts, we should get going on that now. > > > > > >Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want to > > >release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. My > > >current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source > packages > > >and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release > script > > >in those packages. > > > > > >Constructive feedback welcome, > > >-Alex > > > > > >On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks > good > > >>till now. > > >> > > >>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant build > for > > >>a > > >>while. > > >> > > >>Thanks, Piotr > > >> > > >>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Piotr, > > >>> > > >>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop branch > > >>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way first, > > >>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the > > >>>compiler. > > >>> > > >>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI > > >>>servers > > >>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows (the > CI > > >>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). > > >>> > > >>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename > > >>>before > > >>> the merge to develop. > > >>> > > >>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a > > >>>clean > > >>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders and > > >>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build > > >>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the > various > > >>> READMEs first. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> -Alex > > >>> > > >>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >>>wrote: > > >>> > > >>> >Hi Alex, > > >>> > > > >>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not sure > > >>> >whether > > >>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. > > >>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check > > >>>whether > > >>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you > mean > > >>>by > > >>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it by > > >>>maven > > >>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. > > >>> > > > >>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything > looks > > >>>ok. > > >>> > > > >>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all > modules > > >>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably it > > >>>should > > >>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. > > >>> > > > >>> >Thanks, Piotr > > >>> > > > >>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >: > > >>> > > > >>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to > > >>>download > > >>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should > > >>>describe > > >>> >>what > > >>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order to > > >>>have > > >>> >>SWF > > >>> >> output. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary package" - > It > > >>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex project. > I > > >>> >>believe > > >>> >> there could be more people like me. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Thanks, Piotr > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > >>> >> > > >>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post... > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the > > >>>nightly > > >>> >>>for > > >>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not SWF > > >>> >>>output. > > >>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) > > >>>bundle > > >>> >>>the > > >>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF output. > > >>>The > > >>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe bits > > >>>after > > >>> >>> you download them. > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the > source > > >>>zip > > >>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos (royals-compiler, > > >>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the > JSOnly > > >>> >>>binary > > >>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" nightly > but > > >>>in > > >>> >>>a > > >>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash Builder > > >>>and > > >>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again require > > >>> >>>running an > > >>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially something > you > > >>> >>>choose > > >>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure how, > > >>>under > > >>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of > the > > >>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the results > of > > >>>a > > >>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create some > > >>>sort > > >>> >>>of > > >>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven users > you > > >>> >>>choose > > >>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe > airglobal/playerglobal > > >>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by default > for > > >>>the > > >>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't > have > > >>> >>>them, > > >>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night. > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> HTH, > > >>> >>> -Alex > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > > >>> >>>Muppirala" > > >>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >>> >>> >wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package [1] > > >>>and > > >>> >>>have > > >>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >[1] > > >>> >>> > > >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%< > > https://na0 > > >>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> > > >>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex > > >>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% > 7Caharui% > > >>> >>> 40adobe.co > > >>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > > >>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C > > >>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ > > >>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV > > >>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 > > >>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the npm > > >>>package > > >>> >>> >right? > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >Thanks, > > >>> >>> >Om > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala > > >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> > > >>> >>> >wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >>> > > > >>> >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> Hi Om, > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading one > > >>>zip > > >>> >>>file > > >>> >>> >and > > >>> >>> >> using it in IDE. > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> Thanks, > > >>> >>> >> Om > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> Piotr > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala > > >>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> > > >>> >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package all > > >>>the > > >>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > Thanks, > > >>> >>> >> > Om > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the better. > > >>>The > > >>> >>> >> decisions > > >>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as > > >>>possible > > >>> >>>and > > >>> >>> >>make > > >>> >>> >> > our > > >>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release > > >>>often. > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > > >>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >>> >>> >> > > wrote: > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs > > >>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your > merge. > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> -- > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Piotr Zarzycki > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Patreon: > > >>> >>* > > >>> > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > >>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > > >>> > > >>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > > >>>>>8 > > >>>>>14 > > >>> > > >>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&r > > >>>>>e > > >>>>>se > > >>> >>rved=0 > > >>> >> > > >>> >>< > > >>> > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > >>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > > >>> > > >>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > > >>>>>8 > > >>>>>14 > > >>> > > >>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&r > > >>>>>e > > >>>>>se > > >>> >>rved=0>* > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> >-- > > >>> > > > >>> >Piotr Zarzycki > > >>> > > > >>> >Patreon: > > >>> >* > > >>> > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > >>>r > > >>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > >>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > > >>> > > >>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > > >>>>1 > > >>>>58 > > >>> > > >>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reser > > >>>>v > > >>>>ed > > >>> >=0 > > >>> >< > > >>> > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > >>>r > > >>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > >>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > > >>> > > >>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > > >>>>1 > > >>>>58 > > >>> > > >>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reser > > >>>>v > > >>>>ed > > >>> >=0>* > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
