Hi Piotr, thanks. that worked and finaly I was able to compile all repos.
But this makes me feel not completly happy, since before we didn't need to do that. So we have change from 3 "steps" or command line instrucciones to 5. Is this normal? temporal? why we need to do this now and before we didn't? My position is that we need to reduce the complexty to the minimun and now I think we gain in what we want to do but loose in the "make more easy" principle. Thanks 2017-12-12 12:28 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: > Carlos, > > I just pulled all changes in three repositories and build compiler. > Everything went fine. Try to rebuild those project which I have mention. > > Thanks, Piotr > > 2017-12-12 11:10 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > I think that artifacts are already in my .m2 repo, I didn't delete it > > Or at least I never had to do that (if it's not the first build), do you > > think right now it's needed due to changes in packaging ? > > > > Also, I assume I'm on right brach ("develop") > > > > So, If nothing has change for maven I should build 1) compiler., 2) > > typedefs and 3) asjs > > > > let me know if that is what you do > > > > thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > 2017-12-12 11:06 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > Try to build first following projects: compiler-jburg-types and > > > compiler-build-tools. > > > For Maven there were no crucial changes, everything working as it was. > > > > > > Let me know if it's helped. > > > Thanks, Piotr > > > > > > > > > 2017-12-12 10:50 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > for NPM, I think we should bake it in the package. I think NPM is > very > > > > important right now to get the most easy and quick install and use > for > > > > newcomers, and that's what we're pursuing. > > > > > > > > In the other hand, as Yshay, I'm trying to check what is done, and > > right > > > > now I'm syncing "develop" (for the three repos) > > > > > > > > Running "mvn clean install -DskipTests" in compiler, gives me: > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]* > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] The project org.apache.royale.compiler: > > > compiler:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT > > > > (/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-compiler/ > > compiler/pom.xml) > > > > has 1 error > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its > > > dependencies > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > in > > > > apache-plugins-snapshots ( > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots) -> > > *[Help > > > > 2]* > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] The project org.apache.royale.compiler: > > > debugger:0.9.0-SNAPSHOT > > > > (/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-compiler/ > > debugger/pom.xml) > > > > has 1 error > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its > > > dependencies > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > in > > > > apache-plugins-snapshots ( > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots) -> > > *[Help > > > > 2]* > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven > with > > > the > > > > *-e* switch. > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug > > > logging. > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible > solutions, > > > > please read the following articles: > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]* > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ > > > ProjectBuildingException > > > > > > > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]* > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ > > PluginManagerException > > > > > > > > So, this means now, I only need to run that commando in asjs repo? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-12-12 9:15 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some > > naïve > > > > > >questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be > merged > > > into > > > > > >royale-asjs? > > > > > > > > > > The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 > > > repos > > > > > into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, > > > > > royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). > > > > > > > > > > > 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said > > > repos? > > > > > > > > > > It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and > run > > > > "ant > > > > > all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run > > "ant > > > > > all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it > > > doesn't > > > > > clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. > Of > > > > > course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > > 3. “Folks should have noticed that the > > > > > >IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > > > > > >package.” What’s the path to that folder? > > > > > > > > > > royale-asjs > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the > > > > > >framework, in other words will re-building the framework from > > modified > > > > > >source update this (3) folder? > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source > > package > > > > > really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and > the > > > > > binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of > the 3 > > > > > repos after building everything. So if changes are detected > today, > > > they > > > > > should be in this package too. > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM > > > > > >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > > > > > > > > > > > >I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos > > > into > > > > a > > > > > >single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days > > have > > > > been > > > > > >churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the > > > > > >IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > > > > > >package. > > > > > > > > > > > >I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like > execute > > > bits > > > > > >on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should > > > > review > > > > > >the package to see if they like it or not and report things that > > need > > > > > >improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into > the > > > > > >scripts, we should get going on that now. > > > > > > > > > > > >Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we > want > > > to > > > > > >release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. > My > > > > > >current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source > > > > packages > > > > > >and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the > release > > > > script > > > > > >in those packages. > > > > > > > > > > > >Constructive feedback welcome, > > > > > >-Alex > > > > > > > > > > > >On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it > looks > > > > good > > > > > >>till now. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant > > build > > > > for > > > > > >>a > > > > > >>while. > > > > > >> > > > > > >>Thanks, Piotr > > > > > >> > > > > > >>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi Piotr, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop > > branch > > > > > >>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way > > > first, > > > > > >>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in > the > > > > > >>>compiler. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the > CI > > > > > >>>servers > > > > > >>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows > > (the > > > > CI > > > > > >>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on > feature/rename > > > > > >>>before > > > > > >>> the merge to develop. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks > use > > a > > > > > >>>clean > > > > > >>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders > > and > > > > > >>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and > > build > > > > > >>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the > > > > various > > > > > >>> READMEs first. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > > >>> -Alex > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > [email protected]> > > > > > >>>wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> >Hi Alex, > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not > > > sure > > > > > >>> >whether > > > > > >>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. > > > > > >>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that > check > > > > > >>>whether > > > > > >>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do > you > > > > mean > > > > > >>>by > > > > > >>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did > it > > by > > > > > >>>maven > > > > > >>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and > everything > > > > looks > > > > > >>>ok. > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all > > > > modules > > > > > >>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - > probably > > > it > > > > > >>>should > > > > > >>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >Thanks, Piotr > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >: > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How > to > > > > > >>>download > > > > > >>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It > should > > > > > >>>describe > > > > > >>> >>what > > > > > >>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in > order > > > to > > > > > >>>have > > > > > >>> >>SWF > > > > > >>> >> output. > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary > > package" > > > - > > > > It > > > > > >>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex > > > project. > > > > I > > > > > >>> >>believe > > > > > >>> >> there could be more people like me. > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> Thanks, Piotr > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui > <[email protected] > > > >: > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one > > post... > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, > > the > > > > > >>>nightly > > > > > >>> >>>for > > > > > >>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but > not > > > SWF > > > > > >>> >>>output. > > > > > >>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can > never) > > > > > >>>bundle > > > > > >>> >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF > > output. > > > > > >>>The > > > > > >>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the > Adobe > > > bits > > > > > >>>after > > > > > >>> >>> you download them. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that > the > > > > source > > > > > >>>zip > > > > > >>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos > > > (royals-compiler, > > > > > >>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, > the > > > > JSOnly > > > > > >>> >>>binary > > > > > >>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" > > nightly > > > > but > > > > > >>>in > > > > > >>> >>>a > > > > > >>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash > > > Builder > > > > > >>>and > > > > > >>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again > > require > > > > > >>> >>>running an > > > > > >>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially > > something > > > > you > > > > > >>> >>>choose > > > > > >>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure > > > how, > > > > > >>>under > > > > > >>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in > > of > > > > the > > > > > >>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the > > results > > > > of > > > > > >>>a > > > > > >>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create > > > some > > > > > >>>sort > > > > > >>> >>>of > > > > > >>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly > binary. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven > > users > > > > you > > > > > >>> >>>choose > > > > > >>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe > > > > airglobal/playerglobal > > > > > >>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by > > default > > > > for > > > > > >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample > shouldn't > > > > have > > > > > >>> >>>them, > > > > > >>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow > > night. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> HTH, > > > > > >>> >>> -Alex > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of > > OmPrakash > > > > > >>> >>>Muppirala" > > > > > >>> >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > > > > >>><[email protected]> > > > > > >>> >>> >wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that > package > > > [1] > > > > > >>>and > > > > > >>> >>>have > > > > > >>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >[1] > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%< > > > > > https://na0 > > > > > >>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> > > > > > >>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex > > > > > >>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% > > > > 7Caharui% > > > > > >>> >>> 40adobe.co > > > > > >>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9 > a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > > > > > >>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C > > > > > >>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE% > 2B6VeEJ > > > > > >>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV > > > > > >>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the > > npm > > > > > >>>package > > > > > >>> >>> >right? > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >Thanks, > > > > > >>> >>> >Om > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala > > > > > >>><[email protected]> > > > > > >>> >>> >wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > > > > >>><[email protected] > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> Hi Om, > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are > downloading > > > one > > > > > >>>zip > > > > > >>> >>>file > > > > > >>> >>> >and > > > > > >>> >>> >> using it in IDE. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> Thanks, > > > > > >>> >>> >> Om > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> Piotr > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala > > > > > >>> >>><[email protected]> > > > > > >>> >>> >> wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release > package > > > all > > > > > >>>the > > > > > >>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > Thanks, > > > > > >>> >>> >> > Om > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the > > > better. > > > > > >>>The > > > > > >>> >>> >> decisions > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as > > > > > >>>possible > > > > > >>> >>>and > > > > > >>> >>> >>make > > > > > >>> >>> >> > our > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can > release > > > > > >>>often. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > > > > > >>> >>> >> [email protected]> > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > wrote: > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your > > > > merge. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> -- > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> Patreon: > > > > > >>> >>* > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > > > > >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > > > > >>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > > > > > >>>>>8 > > > > > >>>>>14 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > > > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&r > > > > > >>>>>e > > > > > >>>>>se > > > > > >>> >>rved=0 > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >>< > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > > > > >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > > > > >>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 > > > > > >>>>>8 > > > > > >>>>>14 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > > > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&r > > > > > >>>>>e > > > > > >>>>>se > > > > > >>> >>rved=0>* > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >-- > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> >Patreon: > > > > > >>> >* > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > > > > >>>r > > > > > >>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > > > > >>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > > > > > >>>>1 > > > > > >>>>58 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > > > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reser > > > > > >>>>v > > > > > >>>>ed > > > > > >>> >=0 > > > > > >>> >< > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > > > > > >>>r > > > > > >>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > > > > > >>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > > > > > >>>>1 > > > > > >>>>58 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > > > > > 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reser > > > > > >>>>v > > > > > >>>>ed > > > > > >>> >=0>* > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com Conócenos en 1 minuto! <https://avant2.es/#video> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
