Alex,

If they need they can stay. I just thought that this is something which we
did omit during renaming.

Piotr

2017-12-13 20:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs.
> The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the
> Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true.
>
> I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first.
>
> Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders?  They are created
> as part of the Ant build.  A SWC is output in the target folder then
> copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs.  Are you just trying to
> save some size of the package?  What do others think about filtering these
> out of the binary package?   Right now, no binaries are explicitly
> filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary
> package.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will
> >result in a duplication.
> >
> >> In your
> >>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place.
> >
> >
> >2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>:
> >
> >> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. So
> >> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch
> >> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc
> >>isn’t
> >> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under
> >>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\
> >> frameworks\projects\Language\target)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
> >>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f0
> >>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C6364875782221544
> >>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM
> >> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
> >>
> >> Actually, it was:
> >>
> >> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder
> >> ant -f antscripts.xml setup
> >>
> >> I have updated the wiki to reflect this.  I was able to import the
> >>jsonly
> >> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors.
> >>
> >> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link
> >>made it
> >> >>clear to me what the topic was about…
> >> >>
> >> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with
> >>ant
> >> >>all.
> >> >>
> >> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran into
> >> >>some trouble.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>  1.  The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to
> >> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g.  stringAttribute
> >> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION"
> >> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure
> >>if
> >> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed to
> >> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the
> >> >>explicit path.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating.  I think you have to
> >> >do:
> >> >
> >> >cd ide/flashbuilder
> >> >ant -f antscripts.xml
> >> >
> >> >Before importing the external tools.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>  2.  Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] discussion
> >>I
> >> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, but
> >> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log.
> >> >
> >> >It is still on my list to try to fix this.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we
> >>can
> >> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run
> >> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and AIR
> >>so
> >> >>I’m guessing it needs flash.
> >> >
> >> >The JSOnly package should work in FB.  I'll try it again and see why it
> >> >failed.
> >> >
> >> >-Alex
> >> >>
> >> >>Thanks.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>[1]
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle
> >> >>x
> >> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%
> >> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart
> >> >>i
> >> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d
> >> >>5
> >> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636486888529206710&
> >> >>s
> >> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>[2]
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >> >>o
> >> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&
> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui
> >> >>%
> >> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> >> >>7
> >> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata=
> >> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB
> >> >>R
> >> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>[3]
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
> >> >>e
> >> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL-
> >> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0
> >> >>-
> >> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48
> >> >>c
> >> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885
> >> >>2
> >> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P
> >> 7xw%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>[4]
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
> >> >>a
> >> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708
> >> >>d
> >> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636486888529206710
> >> >>&
> >> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM
> >> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some naïve
> >> >>>questions:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  1.  Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged
> >>into
> >> >>>royale-asjs?
> >> >>
> >> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3
> >>repos
> >> >>into one package.  IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs,
> >> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs).
> >> >>
> >> >>>  2.  If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said
> >>repos?
> >> >>
> >> >>It depends on what you tried.  If you just cloned royale-asjs and run
> >> >>"ant
> >> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run "ant
> >> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it
> >>doesn't
> >> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs.  Of
> >> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow.
> >> >>
> >> >>>  3.  “Folks should have noticed that the
> >> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary
> >> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder?
> >> >>
> >> >>royale-asjs
> >> >>
> >> >>>  4.  Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the
> >> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from
> >>modified
> >> >>>source update this (3) folder?
> >> >>
> >> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source package
> >> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the
> >> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3
> >> >>repos after building everything.   So if changes are detected today,
> >>they
> >> >>should be in this package too.
> >> >>
> >> >>HTH,
> >> >>-Alex
> >> >>>
> >> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM
> >> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos
> >>into
> >> >>>a
> >> >>>single source package.  The nightly builds for the past few days have
> >> >>>been
> >> >>>churning out this new package.  Folks should have noticed that the
> >> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary
> >> >>>package.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute
> >>bits
> >> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should
> >> >>>review
> >> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that need
> >> >>>improvement.  If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the
> >> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want
> >>to
> >> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate.  My
> >> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source
> >> >>>packages
> >> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release
> >> >>>script
> >> >>>in those packages.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Constructive feedback welcome,
> >> >>>-Alex
> >> >>>
> >> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks
> >> >>>>good
> >> >>>>till now.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant build
> >> >>>>for
> >> >>>>a
> >> >>>>while.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Thanks, Piotr
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi Piotr,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop
> >>branch
> >> >>>>> locally.  I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way
> >>first,
> >> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the
> >> >>>>>compiler.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI
> >> >>>>>servers
> >> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows
> >>(the
> >> >>>>>CI
> >> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename).
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename
> >> >>>>>before
> >> >>>>> the merge to develop.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a
> >> >>>>>clean
> >> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders
> >>and
> >> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build
> >> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the
> >> >>>>>various
> >> >>>>> READMEs first.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>> -Alex
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> >Hi Alex,
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not
> >>sure
> >> >>>>> >whether
> >> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know.
> >> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check
> >> >>>>>whether
> >> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you
> >> >>>>>mean
> >> >>>>>by
> >> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it
> >>by
> >> >>>>>maven
> >> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient.
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything
> >> >>>>>looks
> >> >>>>>ok.
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all
> >> >>>>>modules
> >> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably
> >>it
> >> >>>>>should
> >> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant.
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to
> >> >>>>>download
> >> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should
> >> >>>>>describe
> >> >>>>> >>what
> >> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order
> >>to
> >> >>>>>have
> >> >>>>> >>SWF
> >> >>>>> >> output.
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary
> >>package" -
> >> >>>>>It
> >> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex
> >>project.
> >> >>>>>I
> >> >>>>> >>believe
> >> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me.
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui
> >><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post...
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the
> >> >>>>>nightly
> >> >>>>> >>>for
> >> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not
> >>SWF
> >> >>>>> >>>output.
> >> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never)
> >> >>>>>bundle
> >> >>>>> >>>the
> >> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF
> >>output.
> >> >>>>>The
> >> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe
> >>bits
> >> >>>>>after
> >> >>>>> >>> you download them.
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the
> >> >>>>>source
> >> >>>>>zip
> >> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos
> >>(royals-compiler,
> >> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the
> >> >>>>>JSOnly
> >> >>>>> >>>binary
> >> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly"
> >>nightly
> >> >>>>>but
> >> >>>>>in
> >> >>>>> >>>a
> >> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash
> >>Builder
> >> >>>>>and
> >> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again
> >>require
> >> >>>>> >>>running an
> >> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits.
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially
> >>something
> >> >>>>>you
> >> >>>>> >>>choose
> >> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download.  I'm not sure
> >>how,
> >> >>>>>under
> >> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of
> >> >>>>>the
> >> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits.  Binary artifacts are supposed to be the
> >>results
> >> >>>>>of
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package.  I suppose we could create
> >>some
> >> >>>>>sort
> >> >>>>> >>>of
> >> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary.
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven
> >>users
> >> >>>>>you
> >> >>>>> >>>choose
> >> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe
> >> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal
> >> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM.  These dependencies are in by
> >>default
> >> >>>>>for
> >> >>>>>the
> >> >>>>> >>> examples.  Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't
> >> >>>>>have
> >> >>>>> >>>them,
> >> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow.
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night.
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> HTH,
> >> >>>>> >>> -Alex
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of
> OmPrakash
> >> >>>>> >>>Muppirala"
> >> >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
> >> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package
> >>[1]
> >> >>>>>and
> >> >>>>> >>>have
> >> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js.
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >[1]
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> <<https:
> >>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c>
> >> https://n
> >> >>>>>>a
> >>
> >>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> >>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com
> >>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> c
> >>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=
> pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9HR
> >>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0.
> >> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt
> >> >>>>>>p
> >> >>>>>>s://na0>
> >> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25>
> >> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex
> >> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%
> >> 7Caharui%
> >> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co
> >> >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> >> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C
> >> >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ
> >> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV
> >> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know.  I should be able to use this in the npm
> >> >>>>>package
> >> >>>>> >>> >right?
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >Thanks,
> >> >>>>> >>> >Om
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
> >> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om,
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading
> >>one
> >> >>>>>zip
> >> >>>>> >>>file
> >> >>>>> >>> >and
> >> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE.
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately?
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks,
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Om
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package
> >>all
> >> >>>>>the
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file?
> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks,
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Om
> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the
> >>better.
> >> >>>>>The
> >> >>>>> >>> >> decisions
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as
> >> >>>>>possible
> >> >>>>> >>>and
> >> >>>>> >>> >>make
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > our
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release
> >> >>>>>often.
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote:
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >  I would also see in the develop Harbs
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your
> >> >>>>>merge.
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow.
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >
> >> >>>>> >>> >> >
> >> >>>>> >>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>>
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> --
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >> Patreon:
> >> >>>>> >>*
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>>t
> >> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
> >> >>>>>>>6
> >> >>>>>>>4
> >> >>>>>>>8
> >> >>>>>>>14
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
> >> >>>>>>>&
> >> >>>>>>>r
> >> >>>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>>se
> >> >>>>> >>rved=0
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >><
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>>t
> >> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
> >> >>>>>>>6
> >> >>>>>>>4
> >> >>>>>>>8
> >> >>>>>>>14
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
> >> >>>>>>>&
> >> >>>>>>>r
> >> >>>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>>se
> >> >>>>> >>rved=0>*
> >> >>>>> >>
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >--
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >>>>> >
> >> >>>>> >Patreon:
> >> >>>>> >*
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>>t
> >> >>>>>r
> >> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
> >> >>>>>>1
> >> >>>>>>4
> >> >>>>>>1
> >> >>>>>>58
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
> >> >>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>r
> >> >>>>>>v
> >> >>>>>>ed
> >> >>>>> >=0
> >> >>>>> ><
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>>t
> >> >>>>>r
> >> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
> >> >>>>>>1
> >> >>>>>>4
> >> >>>>>>1
> >> >>>>>>58
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
> >> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
> >> >>>>>>e
> >> >>>>>>r
> >> >>>>>>v
> >> >>>>>>ed
> >> >>>>> >=0>*
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
> >58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
> >22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&
> reserved
> >=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
> >58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
> >22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&
> reserved
> >=0>*
> >
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to