Hi Alex, We should have some vote on the package name. I'm with second option, but maybe the package for js only should have such indication:
apache-royale-0.9.0-src apache-royale-flexjs-0.9.0-bin (includes SWF support) apache-royale-0.9.0-bin -> apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin Moonshine is working good with both js and swf packages. Thanks, Piotr 2017-12-14 9:55 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > Regarding code completion, there is an issue with FB's additional compiler > options. FB uses is own (now old) version of the ASC2.0 compiler for > code-assist and new compiler options we've added for Royale blow up ASC2.0 > and causes code-assist to fail. > > It looks like you can add Royale-only compiler options via a > <app>-config.xml file as a workaround. > > Also, I pushed changes to try to inject source attachments into the > project when you use the "Convert..." launch configs. > > I would like to hear from more folks that they've tried out the various > packages and like the content. In the NPM thread, Om was suggesting that > instead of having the packages named: > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src > apache-royale-0.9.0-bin (includes SWF support) > apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin (no SWF support) > > That we use: > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src > apache-royale-with-swf-0.9.0-bin (includes SWF support) > apache-royale-0.9.0-bin (no SWF support) > > I had suggested that we might want "flexjs" in the package name: > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src > apache-royale-flexjs-0.9.0-bin (includes SWF support) > apache-royale-0.9.0-bin (no SWF support) > > We should try to agree on packaging ASAP, and then see if we can get > VSCode and Moonshine working with that packaging. > > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > > > > > On 12/13/17, 11:53 PM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Code completion in FB now working out of the box. Still have an issue [1] > >running asjsc though. Note that FB recognizes Application but the script > >doesn’t. > > > >[1] > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa > >che.org%2FPkaw&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7Cc073d5244c3a4a8c4c7008d > >542c7c765%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > 7C636488348179522554& > >sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D&reserved=0 > > > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM > >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > > > >The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs. > >The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the > >Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true. > > > >I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first. > > > >Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders? They are created > >as part of the Ant build. A SWC is output in the target folder then > >copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs. Are you just trying to > >save some size of the package? What do others think about filtering these > >out of the binary package? Right now, no binaries are explicitly > >filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary > >package. > > > >Thoughts? > >-Alex > > > >On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will > >>result in a duplication. > >> > >>> In your > >>>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place. > >> > >> > >>2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>: > >> > >>> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. > >>>So > >>> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch > >>> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc > >>>isn’t > >>> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under > >>>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\ > >>> frameworks\projects\Language\target) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.a > >>>p > >>>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f > >>>0 > >>>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154 > >>>4 > >>>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM > >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > >>> > >>> Actually, it was: > >>> > >>> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder > >>> ant -f antscripts.xml setup > >>> > >>> I have updated the wiki to reflect this. I was able to import the > >>>jsonly > >>> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors. > >>> > >>> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>> > >>> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link > >>>made it > >>> >>clear to me what the topic was about… > >>> >> > >>> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with > >>>ant > >>> >>all. > >>> >> > >>> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran > >>>into > >>> >>some trouble. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> 1. The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to > >>> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g. stringAttribute > >>> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION" > >>> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure > >>>if > >>> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed > >>>to > >>> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the > >>> >>explicit path. > >>> > > >>> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating. I think you have > >>>to > >>> >do: > >>> > > >>> >cd ide/flashbuilder > >>> >ant -f antscripts.xml > >>> > > >>> >Before importing the external tools. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> 2. Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] discussion > >>>I > >>> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, > >>>but > >>> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log. > >>> > > >>> >It is still on my list to try to fix this. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we > >>>can > >>> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run > >>> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and AIR > >>>so > >>> >>I’m guessing it needs flash. > >>> > > >>> >The JSOnly package should work in FB. I'll try it again and see why > >>>it > >>> >failed. > >>> > > >>> >-Alex > >>> >> > >>> >>Thanks. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>[1] > >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle > >>> >>x > >>> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% > >>> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart > >>> >>i > >>> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d > >>> >>5 > >>> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >>> 7C636486888529206710& > >>> >>s > >>> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >>[2] > >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>> >>o > >>> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7& > >>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui > >>> >>% > >>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d% > >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 > >>> >>7 > >>> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata= > >>> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB > >>> >>R > >>> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >>[3] > >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl > >>> >>e > >>> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL- > >>> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0 > >>> >>- > >>> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48 > >>> >>c > >>> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885 > >>> >>2 > >>> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P > >>> 7xw%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >>[4] > >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap > >>> >>a > >>> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708 > >>> >>d > >>> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >>> 7C636486888529206710 > >>> >>& > >>> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM > >>> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some > >>>naïve > >>> >>>questions: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged > >>>into > >>> >>>royale-asjs? > >>> >> > >>> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 > >>>repos > >>> >>into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, > >>> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). > >>> >> > >>> >>> 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said > >>>repos? > >>> >> > >>> >>It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and run > >>> >>"ant > >>> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run > >>>"ant > >>> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it > >>>doesn't > >>> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. Of > >>> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. > >>> >> > >>> >>> 3. “Folks should have noticed that the > >>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > >>> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder? > >>> >> > >>> >>royale-asjs > >>> >> > >>> >>> 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the > >>> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from > >>>modified > >>> >>>source update this (3) folder? > >>> >> > >>> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source > >>>package > >>> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the > >>> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 > >>> >>repos after building everything. So if changes are detected today, > >>>they > >>> >>should be in this package too. > >>> >> > >>> >>HTH, > >>> >>-Alex > >>> >>> > >>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM > >>> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > >>> >>> > >>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos > >>>into > >>> >>>a > >>> >>>single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days > >>>have > >>> >>>been > >>> >>>churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the > >>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary > >>> >>>package. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute > >>>bits > >>> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should > >>> >>>review > >>> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that > >>>need > >>> >>>improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the > >>> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want > >>>to > >>> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. My > >>> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source > >>> >>>packages > >>> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release > >>> >>>script > >>> >>>in those packages. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome, > >>> >>>-Alex > >>> >>> > >>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks > >>> >>>>good > >>> >>>>till now. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant > >>>build > >>> >>>>for > >>> >>>>a > >>> >>>>while. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>> wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>> Hi Piotr, > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop > >>>branch > >>> >>>>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way > >>>first, > >>> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the > >>> >>>>>compiler. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI > >>> >>>>>servers > >>> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows > >>>(the > >>> >>>>>CI > >>> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename > >>> >>>>>before > >>> >>>>> the merge to develop. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use > >>>a > >>> >>>>>clean > >>> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders > >>>and > >>> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and > >>>build > >>> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the > >>> >>>>>various > >>> >>>>> READMEs first. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Thanks, > >>> >>>>> -Alex > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >Hi Alex, > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not > >>>sure > >>> >>>>> >whether > >>> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. > >>> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check > >>> >>>>>whether > >>> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you > >>> >>>>>mean > >>> >>>>>by > >>> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it > >>>by > >>> >>>>>maven > >>> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything > >>> >>>>>looks > >>> >>>>>ok. > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all > >>> >>>>>modules > >>> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably > >>>it > >>> >>>>>should > >>> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to > >>> >>>>>download > >>> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should > >>> >>>>>describe > >>> >>>>> >>what > >>> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order > >>>to > >>> >>>>>have > >>> >>>>> >>SWF > >>> >>>>> >> output. > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary > >>>package" - > >>> >>>>>It > >>> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex > >>>project. > >>> >>>>>I > >>> >>>>> >>believe > >>> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me. > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui > >>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one > >>>post... > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, > >>>the > >>> >>>>>nightly > >>> >>>>> >>>for > >>> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not > >>>SWF > >>> >>>>> >>>output. > >>> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) > >>> >>>>>bundle > >>> >>>>> >>>the > >>> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF > >>>output. > >>> >>>>>The > >>> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe > >>>bits > >>> >>>>>after > >>> >>>>> >>> you download them. > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the > >>> >>>>>source > >>> >>>>>zip > >>> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos > >>>(royals-compiler, > >>> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the > >>> >>>>>JSOnly > >>> >>>>> >>>binary > >>> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" > >>>nightly > >>> >>>>>but > >>> >>>>>in > >>> >>>>> >>>a > >>> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash > >>>Builder > >>> >>>>>and > >>> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again > >>>require > >>> >>>>> >>>running an > >>> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially > >>>something > >>> >>>>>you > >>> >>>>> >>>choose > >>> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure > >>>how, > >>> >>>>>under > >>> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in > >>>of > >>> >>>>>the > >>> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the > >>>results > >>> >>>>>of > >>> >>>>>a > >>> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create > >>>some > >>> >>>>>sort > >>> >>>>> >>>of > >>> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven > >>>users > >>> >>>>>you > >>> >>>>> >>>choose > >>> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe > >>> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal > >>> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by > >>>default > >>> >>>>>for > >>> >>>>>the > >>> >>>>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't > >>> >>>>>have > >>> >>>>> >>>them, > >>> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow > >>>night. > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> HTH, > >>> >>>>> >>> -Alex > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of > >>>OmPrakash > >>> >>>>> >>>Muppirala" > >>> >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package > >>>[1] > >>> >>>>>and > >>> >>>>> >>>have > >>> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >[1] > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% > <<https > >>>>>>>>>:<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. > com/?url=http%3A%25%3c > >>>>>>>>>%3chttps:> > >>>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c> > >>> https://n > >>> >>>>>>a > >>> > >>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. > com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > >>>>>>>>>F > >>>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > 40adobe.co > >>>>>>>>>m > >>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>>>>>>>>c > >>>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata= > pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9H > >>>>>>>>>R > >>>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0. > >>> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt > >>> >>>>>>p > >>> >>>>>>s://na0> > >>> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> > >>> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex > >>> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% > >>> 7Caharui% > >>> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co > >>> >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > >>> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C > >>> >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ > >>> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV > >>> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the > >>>npm > >>> >>>>>package > >>> >>>>> >>> >right? > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, > >>> >>>>> >>> >Om > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala > >>> >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om, > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading > >>>one > >>> >>>>>zip > >>> >>>>> >>>file > >>> >>>>> >>> >and > >>> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE. > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks, > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Om > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala > >>> >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package > >>>all > >>> >>>>>the > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > Om > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the > >>>better. > >>> >>>>>The > >>> >>>>> >>> >> decisions > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as > >>> >>>>>possible > >>> >>>>> >>>and > >>> >>>>> >>> >>make > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > our > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release > >>> >>>>>often. > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > >>> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote: > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your > >>> >>>>>merge. > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> -- > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> Patreon: > >>> >>>>> >>* > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > >>> >>>>>a > >>> >>>>>t > >>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 > >>> >>>>>>>6 > >>> >>>>>>>4 > >>> >>>>>>>8 > >>> >>>>>>>14 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D > >>> >>>>>>>& > >>> >>>>>>>r > >>> >>>>>>>e > >>> >>>>>>>se > >>> >>>>> >>rved=0 > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>< > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > >>> >>>>>a > >>> >>>>>t > >>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 > >>> >>>>>>>6 > >>> >>>>>>>4 > >>> >>>>>>>8 > >>> >>>>>>>14 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D > >>> >>>>>>>& > >>> >>>>>>>r > >>> >>>>>>>e > >>> >>>>>>>se > >>> >>>>> >>rved=0>* > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >-- > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >Patreon: > >>> >>>>> >* > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > >>> >>>>>a > >>> >>>>>t > >>> >>>>>r > >>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 > >>> >>>>>>1 > >>> >>>>>>4 > >>> >>>>>>1 > >>> >>>>>>58 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res > >>> >>>>>>e > >>> >>>>>>r > >>> >>>>>>v > >>> >>>>>>ed > >>> >>>>> >=0 > >>> >>>>> >< > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > >>> >>>>>a > >>> >>>>>t > >>> >>>>>r > >>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 > >>> >>>>>>1 > >>> >>>>>>4 > >>> >>>>>>1 > >>> >>>>>>58 > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% > >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res > >>> >>>>>>e > >>> >>>>>>r > >>> >>>>>>v > >>> >>>>>>ed > >>> >>>>> >=0>* > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >> > >>Piotr Zarzycki > >> > >>Patreon: > >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > >>r > >>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7C6c1b1a5764ed4 > >>b > >>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578 > >>2 > >>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D& > reserve > >>d > >>=0 > >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > >>r > >>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7C6c1b1a5764ed4 > >>b > >>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578 > >>2 > >>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D& > reserve > >>d > >>=0>* > >> > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
