Also, I think we can safely add this to the launch configurations to speed them 
up:



<stringAttribute 
key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LAUNCH_CONFIGURATION_BUILD_SCOPE" 
value="${none}"/>



This disables the IDEs build when launching.



________________________________
From: Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:53:17 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: Repos and Releases

Code completion in FB now working out of the box. Still have an issue [1] 
running asjsc though. Note that FB recognizes Application but the script 
doesn’t.

[1] https://paste.apache.org/Pkaw

From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Repos and Releases

The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs.
The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the
Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true.

I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first.

Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders?  They are created
as part of the Ant build.  A SWC is output in the target folder then
copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs.  Are you just trying to
save some size of the package?  What do others think about filtering these
out of the binary package?   Right now, no binaries are explicitly
filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary
package.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will
>result in a duplication.
>
>> In your
>>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place.
>
>
>2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>:
>
>> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. So
>> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch
>> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc
>>isn’t
>> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under
>>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\
>> frameworks\projects\Language\target)
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
>>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f0
>>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782221544
>>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>>
>> Actually, it was:
>>
>> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder
>> ant -f antscripts.xml setup
>>
>> I have updated the wiki to reflect this.  I was able to import the
>>jsonly
>> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors.
>>
>> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link
>>made it
>> >>clear to me what the topic was about…
>> >>
>> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with
>>ant
>> >>all.
>> >>
>> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran into
>> >>some trouble.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  1.  The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to
>> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g.  stringAttribute
>> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION"
>> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure
>>if
>> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed to
>> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the
>> >>explicit path.
>> >
>> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating.  I think you have to
>> >do:
>> >
>> >cd ide/flashbuilder
>> >ant -f antscripts.xml
>> >
>> >Before importing the external tools.
>> >
>> >
>> >>  2.  Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] discussion
>>I
>> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, but
>> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log.
>> >
>> >It is still on my list to try to fix this.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we
>>can
>> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run
>> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and AIR
>>so
>> >>I’m guessing it needs flash.
>> >
>> >The JSOnly package should work in FB.  I'll try it again and see why it
>> >failed.
>> >
>> >-Alex
>> >>
>> >>Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>[1]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle
>> >>x
>> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%
>> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart
>> >>i
>> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d
>> >>5
>> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636486888529206710&
>> >>s
>> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0
>> >>[2]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>> >>o
>> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&
>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui
>> >>%
>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>> >>7
>> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata=
>> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB
>> >>R
>> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>[3]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
>> >>e
>> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL-
>> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0
>> >>-
>> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48
>> >>c
>> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885
>> >>2
>> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P
>> 7xw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>[4]
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap
>> >>a
>> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708
>> >>d
>> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636486888529206710
>> >>&
>> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM
>> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
>> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some naïve
>> >>>questions:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>  1.  Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged
>>into
>> >>>royale-asjs?
>> >>
>> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3
>>repos
>> >>into one package.  IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs,
>> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs).
>> >>
>> >>>  2.  If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said
>>repos?
>> >>
>> >>It depends on what you tried.  If you just cloned royale-asjs and run
>> >>"ant
>> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run "ant
>> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it
>>doesn't
>> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs.  Of
>> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow.
>> >>
>> >>>  3.  “Folks should have noticed that the
>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary
>> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder?
>> >>
>> >>royale-asjs
>> >>
>> >>>  4.  Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the
>> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from
>>modified
>> >>>source update this (3) folder?
>> >>
>> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source package
>> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the
>> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3
>> >>repos after building everything.   So if changes are detected today,
>>they
>> >>should be in this package too.
>> >>
>> >>HTH,
>> >>-Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM
>> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
>> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases
>> >>>
>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos
>>into
>> >>>a
>> >>>single source package.  The nightly builds for the past few days have
>> >>>been
>> >>>churning out this new package.  Folks should have noticed that the
>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary
>> >>>package.
>> >>>
>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute
>>bits
>> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should
>> >>>review
>> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that need
>> >>>improvement.  If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the
>> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now.
>> >>>
>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want
>>to
>> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate.  My
>> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source
>> >>>packages
>> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release
>> >>>script
>> >>>in those packages.
>> >>>
>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome,
>> >>>-Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks
>> >>>>good
>> >>>>till now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant build
>> >>>>for
>> >>>>a
>> >>>>while.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr
>> >>>>
>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Piotr,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop
>>branch
>> >>>>> locally.  I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way
>>first,
>> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the
>> >>>>>compiler.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI
>> >>>>>servers
>> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows
>>(the
>> >>>>>CI
>> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename
>> >>>>>before
>> >>>>> the merge to develop.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a
>> >>>>>clean
>> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders
>>and
>> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build
>> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the
>> >>>>>various
>> >>>>> READMEs first.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> >Hi Alex,
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not
>>sure
>> >>>>> >whether
>> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know.
>> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check
>> >>>>>whether
>> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you
>> >>>>>mean
>> >>>>>by
>> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it
>>by
>> >>>>>maven
>> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything
>> >>>>>looks
>> >>>>>ok.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all
>> >>>>>modules
>> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably
>>it
>> >>>>>should
>> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to
>> >>>>>download
>> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should
>> >>>>>describe
>> >>>>> >>what
>> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order
>>to
>> >>>>>have
>> >>>>> >>SWF
>> >>>>> >> output.
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary
>>package" -
>> >>>>>It
>> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex
>>project.
>> >>>>>I
>> >>>>> >>believe
>> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me.
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui
>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post...
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the
>> >>>>>nightly
>> >>>>> >>>for
>> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not
>>SWF
>> >>>>> >>>output.
>> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never)
>> >>>>>bundle
>> >>>>> >>>the
>> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF
>>output.
>> >>>>>The
>> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe
>>bits
>> >>>>>after
>> >>>>> >>> you download them.
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the
>> >>>>>source
>> >>>>>zip
>> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos
>>(royals-compiler,
>> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the
>> >>>>>JSOnly
>> >>>>> >>>binary
>> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly"
>>nightly
>> >>>>>but
>> >>>>>in
>> >>>>> >>>a
>> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash
>>Builder
>> >>>>>and
>> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again
>>require
>> >>>>> >>>running an
>> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits.
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially
>>something
>> >>>>>you
>> >>>>> >>>choose
>> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download.  I'm not sure
>>how,
>> >>>>>under
>> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of
>> >>>>>the
>> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits.  Binary artifacts are supposed to be the
>>results
>> >>>>>of
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package.  I suppose we could create
>>some
>> >>>>>sort
>> >>>>> >>>of
>> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary.
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven
>>users
>> >>>>>you
>> >>>>> >>>choose
>> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe
>> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal
>> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM.  These dependencies are in by
>>default
>> >>>>>for
>> >>>>>the
>> >>>>> >>> examples.  Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't
>> >>>>>have
>> >>>>> >>>them,
>> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow.
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night.
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> HTH,
>> >>>>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> >>>>> >>>Muppirala"
>> >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package
>>[1]
>> >>>>>and
>> >>>>> >>>have
>> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js.
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >[1]
>> >>>>> >>>
>>
>>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%<<https:<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c%3chttps:>
>>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c>
>> https://n
>> >>>>>>a
>>
>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
>>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dec
>>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9HR
>>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0.
>> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt
>> >>>>>>p
>> >>>>>>s://na0>
>> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25>
>> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex
>> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%
>> 7Caharui%
>> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co
>> >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C
>> >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ
>> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV
>> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know.  I should be able to use this in the npm
>> >>>>>package
>> >>>>> >>> >right?
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks,
>> >>>>> >>> >Om
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om,
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading
>>one
>> >>>>>zip
>> >>>>> >>>file
>> >>>>> >>> >and
>> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE.
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately?
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>>>> >>> >> Om
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package
>>all
>> >>>>>the
>> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file?
>> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks,
>> >>>>> >>> >> > Om
>> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the
>>better.
>> >>>>>The
>> >>>>> >>> >> decisions
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as
>> >>>>>possible
>> >>>>> >>>and
>> >>>>> >>> >>make
>> >>>>> >>> >> > our
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release
>> >>>>>often.
>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote:
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >  I would also see in the develop Harbs
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your
>> >>>>>merge.
>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow.
>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
>> >>>>> >>> >> >
>> >>>>> >>> >>
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>>
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> --
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >> Patreon:
>> >>>>> >>*
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
>> >>>>>>>6
>> >>>>>>>4
>> >>>>>>>8
>> >>>>>>>14
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
>> >>>>>>>&
>> >>>>>>>r
>> >>>>>>>e
>> >>>>>>>se
>> >>>>> >>rved=0
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >><
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63
>> >>>>>>>6
>> >>>>>>>4
>> >>>>>>>8
>> >>>>>>>14
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D
>> >>>>>>>&
>> >>>>>>>r
>> >>>>>>>e
>> >>>>>>>se
>> >>>>> >>rved=0>*
>> >>>>> >>
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >--
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >Patreon:
>> >>>>> >*
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>>r
>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
>> >>>>>>1
>> >>>>>>4
>> >>>>>>1
>> >>>>>>58
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
>> >>>>>>e
>> >>>>>>r
>> >>>>>>v
>> >>>>>>ed
>> >>>>> >=0
>> >>>>> ><
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>>r
>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648
>> >>>>>>1
>> >>>>>>4
>> >>>>>>1
>> >>>>>>58
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%
>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res
>> >>>>>>e
>> >>>>>>r
>> >>>>>>v
>> >>>>>>ed
>> >>>>> >=0>*
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserved
>=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b
>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782
>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserved
>=0>*
>

Reply via email to