I found this article [1]. Most of our launch scripts are already using Ant, so Ant might be part of the solution.
Ignoring the answers that hardcode a path, the others use some interesting techniques that may or may not work for us. For example, one answer uses Ant's <Script> tag, but Script requires additional libraries and I'm not sure we want to get into that. One answer that got zero votes claimed that executing a Windows command shell with an html would launch the browser. Don't know if that's true or not. On Mac, you might be able to count on the "open" command doing the right thing. The <Script> idea got me thinking about executing Java to find the browser. So that may be another avenue for you to explore. Good luck, -Alex [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4696176/using-ant-how-do-i-open-a-file- in-a-browser On 12/14/17, 2:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: >I added it, but I haven’t been able to figure out the default browser >location. Posted a question on the Eclipse forum. For now, users will >need to manually fix the launch script by replacing $PATH_TO_BROWSER. > >>I've thought about doing something like that, but personally don't want >>to >>deal with figuring out which browser to launch. > >On 12/14/17, 12:34 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I’ll try to add something. Can’t hurt. >> >>>I wonder if we should include a launch cofiguration [2] for showing it >>>in the browser. >> >> >>[1] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>o >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&data=02%7C01%7Caharui >>% >>40adobe.com%7C919de0c0e6d64fab7c5108d542cd8127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>7 >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488372770026928&sdata=%2Bd9X3%2FInQbH0ZVgE5fVmGJrxzy >>d >>cv47JTpmlkxmdSCY%3D&reserved=0 >>[2] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackove >>r >>flow.com%2Fquestions%2F3892862%2Feclipse-setting-up-run-configuration-for >>- >>html-javascript-files&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C919de0c0e6d64fa >>b >>7c5108d542cd8127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648837277 >>0 >>026928&sdata=Ckxw9je0r40nLKraeQx1lRxhS3QIuh7E1elFSYGCmbM%3D&reserved=0 >> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> >>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:10 AM >>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >> >>The asjsc sets configname to "js". It is not configured to compile with >>the Royale Framework. It is only for raw AS->JS transpiling. Apps that >>use the Royale framework should use mxmlc. >> >>HTH, >>-Alex >> >>On 12/13/17, 11:53 PM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Code completion in FB now working out of the box. Still have an issue >>>[1] >>>running asjsc though. Note that FB recognizes Application but the script >>>doesn’t. >>> >>>[1] >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.a >>>p >>>a >>>che.org%2FPkaw&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc073d5244c3a4a8c4c700 >>>8 >>>d >>>542c7c765%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648834817952255 >>>4 >>>& >>>sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM >>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>> >>>The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs. >>>The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the >>>Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true. >>> >>>I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first. >>> >>>Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders? They are >>>created >>>as part of the Ant build. A SWC is output in the target folder then >>>copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs. Are you just trying to >>>save some size of the package? What do others think about filtering >>>these >>>out of the binary package? Right now, no binaries are explicitly >>>filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary >>>package. >>> >>>Thoughts? >>>-Alex >>> >>>On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will >>>>result in a duplication. >>>> >>>>> In your >>>>>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place. >>>> >>>> >>>>2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. >>>>>So >>>>> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run >>>>>launch >>>>> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc >>>>>isn’t >>>>> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under >>>>>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\ >>>>> frameworks\projects\Language\target) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste >>>>>. >>>>>a >>>>>p >>>>>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c0 >>>>>2 >>>>>f >>>>>0 >>>>>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875782221 >>>>>5 >>>>>4 >>>>>4 >>>>>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Alex Harui <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>>> >>>>> Actually, it was: >>>>> >>>>> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder >>>>> ant -f antscripts.xml setup >>>>> >>>>> I have updated the wiki to reflect this. I was able to import the >>>>>jsonly >>>>> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors. >>>>> >>>>> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next. >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link >>>>>made it >>>>> >>clear to me what the topic was about… >>>>> >> >>>>> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with >>>>>ant >>>>> >>all. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran >>>>>into >>>>> >>some trouble. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 1. The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to >>>>> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g. stringAttribute >>>>> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION" >>>>> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not >>>>>sure >>>>>if >>>>> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed >>>>>to >>>>> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with >>>>>the >>>>> >>explicit path. >>>>> > >>>>> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating. I think you have >>>>>to >>>>> >do: >>>>> > >>>>> >cd ide/flashbuilder >>>>> >ant -f antscripts.xml >>>>> > >>>>> >Before importing the external tools. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> 2. Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] >>>>>discussion >>>>>I >>>>> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, >>>>>but >>>>> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log. >>>>> > >>>>> >It is still on my list to try to fix this. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether >>>>>we >>>>>can >>>>> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run >>>>> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and >>>>>AIR >>>>>so >>>>> >>I’m guessing it needs flash. >>>>> > >>>>> >The JSOnly package should work in FB. I'll try it again and see why >>>>>it >>>>> >failed. >>>>> > >>>>> >-Alex >>>>> >> >>>>> >>Thanks. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>[1] >>>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle >>>>> >>x >>>>> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% >>>>> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart >>>>> >>i >>>>> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d >>>>> >>5 >>>>> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>>> 7C636486888529206710& >>>>> >>s >>>>> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>[2] >>>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>>> >>o >>>>> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7& >>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui >>>>> >>% >>>>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d% >>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>>>> >>7 >>>>> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata= >>>>> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB >>>>> >>R >>>>> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>[3] >>>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >>>>> >>e >>>>> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL- >>>>> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0 >>>>> >>- >>>>> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48 >>>>> >>c >>>>> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885 >>>>> >>2 >>>>> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P >>>>> 7xw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>[4] >>>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap >>>>> >>a >>>>> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708 >>>>> >>d >>>>> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>>> 7C636486888529206710 >>>>> >>& >>>>> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM >>>>> >>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some >>>>>naïve >>>>> >>>questions: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be >>>>>merged >>>>>into >>>>> >>>royale-asjs? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 >>>>>repos >>>>> >>into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, >>>>> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said >>>>>repos? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and >>>>>run >>>>> >>"ant >>>>> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run >>>>>"ant >>>>> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it >>>>>doesn't >>>>> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. >>>>>Of >>>>> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> 3. “Folks should have noticed that the >>>>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>>> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>royale-asjs >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the >>>>> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from >>>>>modified >>>>> >>>source update this (3) folder? >>>>> >> >>>>> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source >>>>>package >>>>> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and >>>>>the >>>>> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the >>>>>3 >>>>> >>repos after building everything. So if changes are detected >>>>>today, >>>>>they >>>>> >>should be in this package too. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>HTH, >>>>> >>-Alex >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM >>>>> >>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos >>>>>into >>>>> >>>a >>>>> >>>single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days >>>>>have >>>>> >>>been >>>>> >>>churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the >>>>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>>> >>>package. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like >>>>>execute >>>>>bits >>>>> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should >>>>> >>>review >>>>> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that >>>>>need >>>>> >>>improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into >>>>>the >>>>> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we >>>>>want >>>>>to >>>>> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. >>>>>My >>>>> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source >>>>> >>>packages >>>>> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the >>>>>release >>>>> >>>script >>>>> >>>in those packages. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome, >>>>> >>>-Alex >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it >>>>>looks >>>>> >>>>good >>>>> >>>>till now. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant >>>>>build >>>>> >>>>for >>>>> >>>>a >>>>> >>>>while. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop >>>>>branch >>>>> >>>>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way >>>>>first, >>>>> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>>compiler. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the >>>>>CI >>>>> >>>>>servers >>>>> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows >>>>>(the >>>>> >>>>>CI >>>>> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on >>>>>feature/rename >>>>> >>>>>before >>>>> >>>>> the merge to develop. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks >>>>>use >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>clean >>>>> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders >>>>>and >>>>> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and >>>>>build >>>>> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the >>>>> >>>>>various >>>>> >>>>> READMEs first. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >Hi Alex, >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not >>>>>sure >>>>> >>>>> >whether >>>>> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. >>>>> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that >>>>>check >>>>> >>>>>whether >>>>> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do >>>>>you >>>>> >>>>>mean >>>>> >>>>>by >>>>> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did >>>>>it >>>>>by >>>>> >>>>>maven >>>>> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and >>>>>everything >>>>> >>>>>looks >>>>> >>>>>ok. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all >>>>> >>>>>modules >>>>> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - >>>>>probably >>>>>it >>>>> >>>>>should >>>>> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >>>>><[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How >>>>>to >>>>> >>>>>download >>>>> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It >>>>>should >>>>> >>>>>describe >>>>> >>>>> >>what >>>>> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in >>>>>order >>>>>to >>>>> >>>>>have >>>>> >>>>> >>SWF >>>>> >>>>> >> output. >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary >>>>>package" - >>>>> >>>>>It >>>>> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex >>>>>project. >>>>> >>>>>I >>>>> >>>>> >>believe >>>>> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me. >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui >>>>><[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one >>>>>post... >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>>nightly >>>>> >>>>> >>>for >>>>> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but >>>>>not >>>>>SWF >>>>> >>>>> >>>output. >>>>> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can >>>>>never) >>>>> >>>>>bundle >>>>> >>>>> >>>the >>>>> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF >>>>>output. >>>>> >>>>>The >>>>> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the >>>>>Adobe >>>>>bits >>>>> >>>>>after >>>>> >>>>> >>> you download them. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>>source >>>>> >>>>>zip >>>>> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos >>>>>(royals-compiler, >>>>> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>>JSOnly >>>>> >>>>> >>>binary >>>>> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" >>>>>nightly >>>>> >>>>>but >>>>> >>>>>in >>>>> >>>>> >>>a >>>>> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash >>>>>Builder >>>>> >>>>>and >>>>> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again >>>>>require >>>>> >>>>> >>>running an >>>>> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially >>>>>something >>>>> >>>>>you >>>>> >>>>> >>>choose >>>>> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure >>>>>how, >>>>> >>>>>under >>>>> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in >>>>>of >>>>> >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the >>>>>results >>>>> >>>>>of >>>>> >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create >>>>>some >>>>> >>>>>sort >>>>> >>>>> >>>of >>>>> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly >>>>>binary. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven >>>>>users >>>>> >>>>>you >>>>> >>>>> >>>choose >>>>> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe >>>>> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal >>>>> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by >>>>>default >>>>> >>>>>for >>>>> >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample >>>>>shouldn't >>>>> >>>>>have >>>>> >>>>> >>>them, >>>>> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow >>>>>night. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> HTH, >>>>> >>>>> >>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of >>>>>OmPrakash >>>>> >>>>> >>>Muppirala" >>>>> >>>>> >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>> >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that >>>>>package >>>>>[1] >>>>> >>>>>and >>>>> >>>>> >>>have >>>>> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >[1] >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%<<htt >>>>>>>>>>>p<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25% >>>>>>>>>>>3c%3chttp> >>>>>>>>>>>s<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25% >>>>>>>>>>>3 >>>>>>>>>>>c%3chttps<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt >>>>>>>>>>>p >>>>>>>>>>>%3A%25%3c%3chttps%3chttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.co >>>>>>>>>>>m >>>>>>>>>>>/?url=http%3A%25%3c%3chttps>> >>>>>>>>>>>:<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25% >>>>>>>>>>>3 >>>>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>>>%3chttps:> >>>>>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c> >>>>> https://n >>>>> >>>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F >>>>>>>>>>>% >>>>>>>>>>>2 >>>>>>>>>>>F >>>>>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe. >>>>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>>>o >>>>>>>>>>>m >>>>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178 >>>>>>>>>>>d >>>>>>>>>>>e >>>>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv >>>>>>>>>>>9 >>>>>>>>>>>H >>>>>>>>>>>R >>>>>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0. >>>>> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt >>>>> >>>>>>p >>>>> >>>>>>s://na0> >>>>> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> >>>>> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex >>>>> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% >>>>> 7Caharui% >>>>> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >>>>> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ >>>>> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV >>>>> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the >>>>>npm >>>>> >>>>>package >>>>> >>>>> >>> >right? >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>> >Om >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>> >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>>> >>>>><[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om, >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are >>>>>downloading >>>>>one >>>>> >>>>>zip >>>>> >>>>> >>>file >>>>> >>>>> >>> >and >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Om >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>> >>>>> >>><[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release >>>>>package >>>>>all >>>>> >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > Om >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the >>>>>better. >>>>> >>>>>The >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> decisions >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as >>>>> >>>>>possible >>>>> >>>>> >>>and >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>make >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > our >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can >>>>>release >>>>> >>>>>often. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> [email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your >>>>> >>>>>merge. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >> Patreon: >>>>> >>>>> >>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>> >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>t >>>>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>>> >>>>>>>6 >>>>> >>>>>>>4 >>>>> >>>>>>>8 >>>>> >>>>>>>14 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>>> >>>>>>>& >>>>> >>>>>>>r >>>>> >>>>>>>e >>>>> >>>>>>>se >>>>> >>>>> >>rved=0 >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>< >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>> >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>t >>>>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>>> >>>>>>>6 >>>>> >>>>>>>4 >>>>> >>>>>>>8 >>>>> >>>>>>>14 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>>> >>>>>>>& >>>>> >>>>>>>r >>>>> >>>>>>>e >>>>> >>>>>>>se >>>>> >>>>> >>rved=0>* >>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >-- >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >Patreon: >>>>> >>>>> >* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>> >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>t >>>>> >>>>>r >>>>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>>> >>>>>>1 >>>>> >>>>>>4 >>>>> >>>>>>1 >>>>> >>>>>>58 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>>> >>>>>>e >>>>> >>>>>>r >>>>> >>>>>>v >>>>> >>>>>>ed >>>>> >>>>> >=0 >>>>> >>>>> >< >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>> >>>>>a >>>>> >>>>>t >>>>> >>>>>r >>>>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>>> >>>>>>1 >>>>> >>>>>>4 >>>>> >>>>>>1 >>>>> >>>>>>58 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>>> >>>>>>e >>>>> >>>>>>r >>>>> >>>>>>v >>>>> >>>>>>ed >>>>> >>>>> >=0>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>> >>>>Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>>Patreon: >>>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>a >>>>t >>>>r >>>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764e >>>>d >>>>4 >>>>b >>>>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875 >>>>7 >>>>8 >>>>2 >>>>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reser >>>>v >>>>e >>>>d >>>>=0 >>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>>a >>>>t >>>>r >>>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764e >>>>d >>>>4 >>>>b >>>>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364875 >>>>7 >>>>8 >>>>2 >>>>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reser >>>>v >>>>e >>>>d >>>>=0>* >>>> >>> >> >
