Ok, that's good point. But, if users need to refer it in code they will need to import the full package rute plus TextPromptBead right? This could be very confusing right? It's only a suggestion (I think is good)? or do you like more TextPromptBead than TextPrompt?
Thanks Carlos 2018-05-21 17:44 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > Commenting on this one item (before I respond to the rest). > > If all you want to do is add <j:TextPrompt>, you can do this: > > <component id="TextPrompt" > class="org.apache.royale.html.accessories.TextPromptBead" > lookupOnly="true" /> > > Express does this a lot. > > Harbs > > > On May 21, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > In the other hand as I notice before, we can use this to refactor > packages > > and names. Before I mention the convenience to reduce names. > > <beads> > > <js:TextPrompt/> > > > > seems less verbose, more elegant and equally efective than > > > > <beads> > > <js:TextPromptBead/> > > > > right? > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
