Ok Piotr, I think that's better, I'll see as soon as I end here Thanks! :) El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 17:08, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> I just merged to that branch latest changes from develop. Once you finish > whatever you are doing, switch there and play with it yourself. There is > nothing to discuss blindly before you didn't touch that branch. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 17:01 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > Carlos, > > > > I cannot change it because itemRendererParent field is type of > IItemRendererParent > > [1] and that interface doesn't contains that method. Link [1] is pointing > > to develop branch, but that interfaces looks > > exactly the same in integration branch. > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/IItemRendererParent.as > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 16:19 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Piotr, > >> what I'm saying is that the whole fiel is created by me, and you have a > >> line of code that is different to what I have in develop. So something > is > >> wrong in the merge to the integration branch. The line of code I'm > posting > >> is the right one and the one you should have in the integration branch. > >> > >> I'm still on develop fixing the 4 things I commented. When I finish I'll > >> be > >> trying the integration branch. In the mean while, since that line is not > >> right, can you change it for the one I posted?, If not when I reach to > the > >> integration branch I'll change it myself > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> Carlos > >> > >> > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:43, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > >> > Carlos, > >> > > >> > Are you using this branch ? > >> > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > >> > > >> > > >> > Above branch need to be tested and my previous link pointing to > sources > >> > from that branch. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Piotr > >> > > >> > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:39 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > napisał(a): > >> > > >> > > Hi Piotr, > >> > > > >> > > I don't have that line: > >> > > > >> > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(processedRow); > >> > > > >> > > I have this in develop: > >> > > > >> > > itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); > >> > > > >> > > How is this possible? is very strange :? > >> > > > >> > > The item renderer is removed in the loop, the last line is to remove > >> the > >> > > row (tr) element from the itemRendererParent (tbody) > >> > > > >> > > Can you change to this > >> itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); ? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:31, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > >> > > > No this is not that line. That's the next one which is commented > >> right > >> > > now. > >> > > > [1]. Uncomment line to see error. Maven is failing with error > which > >> is > >> > > > valid[2] > >> > > > > >> > > > [1] > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/ed55aee86e92d36397a52cffd44df1fa56393c5f/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/beads/itemRenderers/RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as#L135 > >> > > > [2] https://paste.apache.org/8mlQ > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Piotr > >> > > > > >> > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:23 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > >> > > > > Piotr, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > let me see if I understand the problem. That line: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(ir); > >> > > > > > >> > > > > is making compilation fail? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > That would be very strange since my compilation succeeded. and > >> seems > >> > > the > >> > > > > line is ok. If so it could be a similar problem to the one we > saw > >> > > > recently > >> > > > > in witch compilation was ok localy but failing in the server. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Let me know about this problem to see what I should take care > >> > > > > > >> > > > > thanks! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Carlos > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Ok understand. Thanks for explanation. If you could look into > >> that > >> > > how > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > achieve that without build fail that would be great. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:11 Carlos Rovira < > carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > > > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Table component uses TBodyContentArea as IContentView > instead > >> of > >> > > > > > DataGroup, > >> > > > > > > so the IItemRendererParent needs its own implementation. > >> > > > > > > Inside TBody(<tbody>), we have each item render as a > TableRow > >> > > (<tr>), > >> > > > > > that > >> > > > > > > has inside a TableCell (<td>) and then the > TableItemRenderer. > >> > > > > > > So when adding, removing, and so on from the dataProvider to > >> > manage > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > item renderers you need to create or destroy this structure. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > So if you see the code, you'll that I'm removing the cells > >> inside > >> > > the > >> > > > > row > >> > > > > > > and the itemrender inside the cell so signaling the > >> appropriate > >> > > > removal > >> > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > listeners. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hope this explanation solve your doubt > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > thanks > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Carlos > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 12:50, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two times > >> > > removing > >> > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? It > >> > shouldn't > >> > > > > event > >> > > > > > > work > >> > > > > > > > because there is no method removeElement in that > interface. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/62265d52abdf34f797dc7582841ed029d8fb0cff/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/beads/itemRenderers/RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as#L131 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >> > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > That change should be reverted. I added it to try and > fix > >> an > >> > > > issue > >> > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic > >> columns. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Harbs, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Some time ago you have added interface > >> IDataGridColumnList > >> > > [1]. > >> > > > > It > >> > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > used > >> > > > > > > > > > here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property > >> and > >> > > build > >> > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > > failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > >> > > > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [2] > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > >> > > > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > <mailto: > >> > > > > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> for me its ok, but only want to point something > >> > important. I > >> > > > > think > >> > > > > > > we > >> > > > > > > > > all > >> > > > > > > > > >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about > this. I > >> > > think > >> > > > > all > >> > > > > > > > > positions > >> > > > > > > > > >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring > to > >> > the > >> > > > > plate > >> > > > > > > are > >> > > > > > > > > new, > >> > > > > > > > > >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that > we > >> all > >> > > can > >> > > > > get > >> > > > > > > > what > >> > > > > > > > > we > >> > > > > > > > > >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel > >> can't > >> > > > link > >> > > > > > > basic, > >> > > > > > > > > so > >> > > > > > > > > >> it must create it's own versions. In case this could > >> not > >> > be > >> > > > > > > possible, > >> > > > > > > > > >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating > >> > Jewel > >> > > > > > versions > >> > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and > >> DropDownList > >> > > show > >> > > > > > that I > >> > > > > > > > > was in > >> > > > > > > > > >> the right track, since the things I copied are > modified > >> > for > >> > > > > Jewel > >> > > > > > > > since > >> > > > > > > > > >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In > Basic > >> > > there's > >> > > > > too > >> > > > > > > > much > >> > > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and > that > >> > > means > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece > >> of > >> > > code > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > > could be > >> > > > > > > > > >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs > >> and > >> > > CSS > >> > > > > > don't > >> > > > > > > > > want to > >> > > > > > > > > >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will > need > >> to > >> > > deal > >> > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > those > >> > > > > > > > > >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code > >> > should > >> > > > help > >> > > > > > you > >> > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > put > >> > > > > > > > > >> the Pilars of other high level things without the > need > >> of > >> > > > > looking > >> > > > > > > how > >> > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > >> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in > >> > Basic > >> > > > code > >> > > > > > > when > >> > > > > > > > > >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things > >> could > >> > be > >> > > > > > change > >> > > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > > >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here > >> > things > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > Basic > >> > > > > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at > >> > > least), > >> > > > > can > >> > > > > > > use > >> > > > > > > > > it. > >> > > > > > > > > >> And Jewel can't use. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Don't see other way. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Let's see this as we end this release. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > > > > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) > >> > > > > > > > > >> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had > enough > >> > > > problems > >> > > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > >>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as > >> is. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of > >> that > >> > > > stuff > >> > > > > > > after > >> > > > > > > > > >>> release. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert > we > >> > said > >> > > to > >> > > > > do, > >> > > > > > > so > >> > > > > > > > > >> when > >> > > > > > > > > >>> we > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more > >> > > > consistent. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of > >> DataGroup I > >> > > can > >> > > > > > move > >> > > > > > > it > >> > > > > > > > > >> from > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core > to > >> > > > consider. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki > (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have > >> that > >> > > > > changes, > >> > > > > > > but > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache > to > >> > make > >> > > it > >> > > > > > > > working. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of > that. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui > >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and > >> merged > >> > > it > >> > > > > into > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in > >> the > >> > > > > > integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>> branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because > DataGroup > >> got > >> > > > moved > >> > > > > > > from > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Basic > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. > >> I > >> > was > >> > > > > under > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not > >> going > >> > to > >> > > > be > >> > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with > >> > resolving > >> > > > > these > >> > > > > > > > > >> issues. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them > >> out. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui > >> > > > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale > >> then > >> > you > >> > > > can > >> > > > > > > > > >>> pull > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> those > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > > > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you > know > >> how > >> > > to > >> > > > > fix > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Probably I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven > >> > > complaining. > >> > > > > :) > >> > > > > > > > > >>> If > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> you > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> won't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> have > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I switched to the > >> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the > >> > begining > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method > numItemRenderers > >> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> interface > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class > >> > DataGroup > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends > >> > ContainerContentArea > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in > >> > interface > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends > >> > ContainerContentArea > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > *------------------------------------------------------------------------* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent > >> > > > > > > > > >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> .... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2.164 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ........................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.273 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> .................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.175 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ..................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.691 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ............... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.947 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: > Binding > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ............ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SKIPPED* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was > >> > > > > > > > > >> compiling > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> tested > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are > still > >> > > > > > > > > >>> unsolved. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale > >> introduced > >> > > > > > > > > >> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> MX > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> API > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it > >> needs to > >> > > > > > > > > >> add > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> it. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> For now > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it > reach > >> > Basic > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> library > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> could be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did > you > >> try > >> > > to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> compile with > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> maven > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. > I'll > >> > > > > > > > > >> return > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jewel > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> duties > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos > Rovira > >> (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and > >> report > >> > if > >> > > > > > > > > >> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> find > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> isuue. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr > >> Zarzycki > >> > (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next > >> version > >> > > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Royale. One > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in > >> MXRoyale > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> develop. I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in > >> > MXRoyale > >> > > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> develop > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> now is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to > develop I > >> > > > > > > > > >> would > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> like > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to ask > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> you to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - > >> > > > > > > > > >> whether I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> didn't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> break any > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - > >> please > >> > > > > > > > > >> make > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> changes and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> commit > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to that branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and > test > >> > some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Jewel > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> examples ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to > >> see > >> > > > > > > > > >> what > >> > > > > > > > > >>> is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> happen. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a > integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>> branch, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> moreover > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> since > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. > >> Then > >> > > > > > > > > >>> solve > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> conflicts in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is > >> > > > > > > > > >> compiling > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> working > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> as > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the > >> integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex > Harui > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root > folders > >> for > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> projects. I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and > master > >> > > > > > > > > >> may > >> > > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> running > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wherever > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, > >> royale-compiler > >> > > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> royale-typedefs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> other > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> builds > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> should > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the > results > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> those > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> builds. If > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> you > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> want > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to > the > >> > > > > > > > > >>> agent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that's > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine as > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> well. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would > not > >> > > > > > > > > >> run > >> > > > > > > > > >>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> master. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] > >> [2] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> It's > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pointing for > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> reason > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those > one > >> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Program > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Files. How > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> path > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr > Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you > >> > > > > > > > > >> will > >> > > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> done > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with all > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with > >> > > > > > > > > >> ACE > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> multiple > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> machines. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first > >> > > > > > > > > >>> running > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> ant on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> typedefs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> repo and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not > >> > > > > > > > > >>> really > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sure what > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> triggered > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Dunno… > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> works > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> for me > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fixing > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> couple > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> days. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> cherry-picked from > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> but I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> can't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> find it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> so I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> guess > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the > >> > > > > > > > > >>> builds > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> began to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fail > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able > >> > > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> fix > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it was > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> create a > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the > >> > > > > > > > > >>> screen > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> (to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> run > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> agent. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> royale-typedefs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> should > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> still > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> here > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> are > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> probably a > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> matter of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> think it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did all > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at one > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> independent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> of any > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> issues > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have > >> > > > > > > > > >> a > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> slight > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> preference > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wait a > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex > >> > > > > > > > > >>> working, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> but if > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I'm not > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RM > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> merge > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> from > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was > >> > > > > > > > > >>> also > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pondering just > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> "master" > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this > >> > > > > > > > > >> fixes > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> issue with > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> build. - > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Not > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build > >> > > > > > > > > >> for > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> module > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Icons. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> build.xml, if > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it won't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> work > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing > >> > > > > > > > > >> build > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> [1]. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> It > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> complaining > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs > >> > > > > > > > > >>> does > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> exist" and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> being > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> build > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> folder > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
