Hi Harbs,

I insist that is better, to push to the branch so I can compare between
develop and your branch. otherwise will be more difficult for me to get
differences and patch them.
Once I make the fixes, that is pretty sure I'll have to do, I can merge it
directly or wait to others that would need to do its revisions.

thanks

Carlos


El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 21:30, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Harbs,
>
> I will wait for your branch and take a look into that as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 2 wrz 2018 o 20:36 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > I hope to be able to push tonight.
> >
> > I’m pretty close, but there’s still some issues with the merge.
> >
> > Once I push, you can look at what I did and comment. :-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 2, 2018, at 9:12 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok Harbs,
> > >
> > > I'll prefer, you say here you have it ok. So me and others could build
> > > localy and test as most projects as possible, to detect that all is ok.
> > > As I said there's code on Jewel changed that will not work in the
> current
> > > state, and I think I'm the only one that knows what's working and what
> > not
> > >
> > > moving things to Basic I assume that is copying it from Core to Basic
> and
> > > to Jewel and removing from Core? For me that's ok.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 17:59, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> > >
> > >> I’m working on a new merge.
> > >>
> > >> I’m moving some classes back to Basic to reduce the number of
> conflicts.
> > >>
> > >> Let’s see if my attempt works any better.
> > >>
> > >> If it works well, I’ll push my branch when it’s done…
> > >>
> > >> On my first attempt to merge, I see lots of conflicts related to AMF.
> > I’m
> > >> not sure which is the latest.
> > >>
> > >>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 6:26 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The problem is than far beyond the merge problems, code was changed
> in
> > >> some
> > >>> classes (at least in Jewel I see changes), to get compiling. This
> make
> > >> more
> > >>> difficult to be confident with the actual code I integration branch
> > since
> > >>> we must to know what code is the latest, and see if code was not
> > changed
> > >> to
> > >>> get it compile, since normally that code will not work since was
> change
> > >> to
> > >>> compile but never tested, and would be a hit of luck if it works.
> > >>>
> > >>> As I said, I can help on that front in few days, but I'm running to
> get
> > >>> most of the things I have on my plate done, working many ours a day
> in
> > >>> this. Sorry to not be of much help right now.
> > >>>
> > >>> Carlos
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 14:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I meant here  DataContainerView and  DataContainerBase missing
> methods
> > >>>> there.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Piotr
> > >>>>
> > >>>> niedz., 2 wrz 2018 o 14:24 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I’m not sure what you are referring to. Do you mean the merge
> > >> conflicts?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I’m pretty sure there is more than one class which has conflicts.
> > >> Carlos
> > >>>>> is right that there could be lot of classes which need resolution,
> > but
> > >>>> I’m
> > >>>>> not sure what the right answer is.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> We might need to go through all the classes manually and check
> them…
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Carlos,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please let's do not make such drastical steps. It looks like Harbs
> > >>>> found
> > >>>>>> where the issue is.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Let's make the changes and see whether it is working.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Harbs can you do this?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Piotr
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 12:42 PM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> To tell you the truth, I don’t understand exactly how the tokens
> > are
> > >>>>>>> working, but the $ prefix definitely breaks it.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I’m guessing the brackets is an XML construct recognized as a
> > >> variable
> > >>>>> in
> > >>>>>>> things like E4X.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Harbs
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi Habs,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 11:42, Harbs (<
> harbs.li...@gmail.com
> > >)
> > >>>>>>> escribió:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I found the problem.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Carlos, I don’t know why you changed the tokens in the config
> > >> files,
> > >>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>> changing them made them unrecognized and caused the FlexUnit
> > tests
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>>> fail.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I thought the tokens you refer was not correctly setup, since
> > >> doesn't
> > >>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>> the $ symbol and this way those are not interpreted and changed
> by
> > >>>>> maven.
> > >>>>>>>> What I tried to do is fix maven build distribution. When I
> create
> > a
> > >>>> SDK
> > >>>>>>> vía
> > >>>>>>>> Maven, I get flex-config.xml and other files with
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> <path-element>{playerglobalHome}/{targetPlayerMajorVersion}.{targetPlayerMinorVersion}/playerglobal.swc</path-element>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> instead of
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
>  <path-element>libs/path/20.0/playerglobal.swc</path-element>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> that is what IDEs expect.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Maybe this is not the way to get this? if not how could we get
> > maven
> > >>>>>>>> generates those files?. In the other hand, Can FlexUnit change
> to
> > >>>>>>> recognize
> > >>>>>>>> token with $ prefix?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> > >>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Carlos Rovira
> > >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to