Ok Harbs,

I'll prefer, you say here you have it ok. So me and others could build
localy and test as most projects as possible, to detect that all is ok.
As I said there's code on Jewel changed that will not work in the current
state, and I think I'm the only one that knows what's working and what not

moving things to Basic I assume that is copying it from Core to Basic and
to Jewel and removing from Core? For me that's ok.

Thanks


El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 17:59, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> I’m working on a new merge.
>
> I’m moving some classes back to Basic to reduce the number of conflicts.
>
> Let’s see if my attempt works any better.
>
> If it works well, I’ll push my branch when it’s done…
>
> On my first attempt to merge, I see lots of conflicts related to AMF. I’m
> not sure which is the latest.
>
> > On Sep 2, 2018, at 6:26 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > The problem is than far beyond the merge problems, code was changed in
> some
> > classes (at least in Jewel I see changes), to get compiling. This make
> more
> > difficult to be confident with the actual code I integration branch since
> > we must to know what code is the latest, and see if code was not changed
> to
> > get it compile, since normally that code will not work since was change
> to
> > compile but never tested, and would be a hit of luck if it works.
> >
> > As I said, I can help on that front in few days, but I'm running to get
> > most of the things I have on my plate done, working many ours a day in
> > this. Sorry to not be of much help right now.
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 14:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> I meant here  DataContainerView and  DataContainerBase missing methods
> >> there.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> niedz., 2 wrz 2018 o 14:24 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> I’m not sure what you are referring to. Do you mean the merge
> conflicts?
> >>>
> >>> I’m pretty sure there is more than one class which has conflicts.
> Carlos
> >>> is right that there could be lot of classes which need resolution, but
> >> I’m
> >>> not sure what the right answer is.
> >>>
> >>> We might need to go through all the classes manually and check them…
> >>>
> >>>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Carlos,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please let's do not make such drastical steps. It looks like Harbs
> >> found
> >>>> where the issue is.
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's make the changes and see whether it is working.
> >>>>
> >>>> Harbs can you do this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Piotr
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 12:42 PM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> To tell you the truth, I don’t understand exactly how the tokens are
> >>>>> working, but the $ prefix definitely breaks it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’m guessing the brackets is an XML construct recognized as a
> variable
> >>> in
> >>>>> things like E4X.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sep 2, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Habs,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> El dom., 2 sept. 2018 a las 11:42, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>)
> >>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I found the problem.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Carlos, I don’t know why you changed the tokens in the config
> files,
> >>> but
> >>>>>>> changing them made them unrecognized and caused the FlexUnit tests
> >> to
> >>>>> fail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> I thought the tokens you refer was not correctly setup, since
> doesn't
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>> the $ symbol and this way those are not interpreted and changed by
> >>> maven.
> >>>>>> What I tried to do is fix maven build distribution. When I create a
> >> SDK
> >>>>> vía
> >>>>>> Maven, I get flex-config.xml and other files with
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> <path-element>{playerglobalHome}/{targetPlayerMajorVersion}.{targetPlayerMinorVersion}/playerglobal.swc</path-element>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> instead of
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>        <path-element>libs/path/20.0/playerglobal.swc</path-element>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> that is what IDEs expect.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe this is not the way to get this? if not how could we get maven
> >>>>>> generates those files?. In the other hand, Can FlexUnit change to
> >>>>> recognize
> >>>>>> token with $ prefix?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to