I'm doing Maven build and HTML was failing. It is because it need to depend
again from Basic. I can make the changes.

Carlos are you on that right now ? I don't want to collide with you.

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 10:28 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a):

> Hi Harbs,
>
> I'm available for you to help you solve. write me when you need.
>
> Just a note: for doing this, I'll take the following path: I'll try to
> compile and run without make Jewel depend on Basic, since is the actual
> shape. From there I'll try to link Basic. I think that path will provide
> you a more safe point from what you could go to next step. Just my advice
> if you want to take it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 10:23, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > OK. Everything compiles now.
> >
> > I’m going to run the branch against some applications and see what
> > happens. If you could do the same, it would be helpful.
> >
> > Carlos, I probably need some direction on how to test Jewel.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok! Again good luck! :)
> > >
> > > pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:34 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> The issues that I see with Jewel are related to the changes that were
> > lost
> > >> when you merged.
> > >>
> > >> I’m hoping I can resolve this quickly. Let’s see how over-optimistic
> I’m
> > >> being… ;-)
> > >>
> > >> Harbs
> > >>
> > >>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Harbs,
> > >>>
> > >>> There is also another way. Maybe it is worth that I will spend couple
> > of
> > >>> hours on my branch and try to understand what was wrong. If I would
> > >> manage
> > >>> to do that - maybe you will be able to add your stuff on top of that
> ?
> > Do
> > >>> you see value in that approach ?
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm just afraid that doing again Jewel depends on Basic end up with a
> > lot
> > >>> of problems for you and delay for weeks that release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Piotr
> > >>>
> > >>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>> napisał(a):
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Harbs,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Looking forward to your changes. I'm just interested in release in
> > >>>> whatever state it is and dealing with discussion later on.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Btw. I have invested also at least 6h with merge stuff and as you
> can
> > >> see
> > >>>> it end up with bigger things. Good Luck! :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Piotr
> > >>>>
> > >>>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Right now, my priority is getting all three active branches
> combined
> > >> with
> > >>>>> all code working. That means MX/Spark, Jewel, and all the additions
> > on
> > >> the
> > >>>>> revert branch all coexisting nicely in the merge branch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I’m spending the better part of today on that.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I’d like to hold off on discussing where to go from here until I
> > >>>>> understand the issues you went through with Jewel better. I expect
> > I’m
> > >>>>> going to go through a lot of the pain you already went through
> > already
> > >>>>> getting Jewel to compile and work with the merges.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I might end up in the same place as you. Don’t know yet…
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I’m open to all possibilities. Even if we do separate depenendies,
> > >> having
> > >>>>> the dependencies even temporarily *might* help resolve some of the
> > >>>>> underlying technical issues.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Let’s discuss when I come up for air… ;-)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Harbs
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> considering making Jewel dependent on Basic. I'm trying to put my
> > mind
> > >>>>> in
> > >>>>>> that place. Since this is a huge effort for me, hope you all try
> to
> > do
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>> same as me and considering some thoughts, so we can plan something
> > >> that
> > >>>>>> works for all:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Since Basic will be the middle point between Core and Jewel, can
> we
> > >>>>>> consider to move Basic CSS and TLCS to a BasicUI swc? So Basic
> could
> > >> be
> > >>>>>> really the common basic library and CSS doesn't mess Jewel things?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> If so, we can go that router and test and discuss that integration
> > in
> > >> a
> > >>>>>> separate branch and deal with all of that.
> > >>>>>> this will inevitably delay the release, but maybe is time to solve
> > >> this
> > >>>>>> first.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> One of the things to do in the final result is to compile Jewel
> > (debug
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>> release) and comparte results on develop and results on
> integration
> > >>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Then we can decide what's better and release that
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thoughts?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 4:53, Alex Harui
> > >> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > >>>>>> )
> > >>>>>> escribió:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> FWIW, I agree with Harbs.  Enough time has passed and changes
> have
> > >> been
> > >>>>>>> made that it is time to try making Jewel dependent on Basic so we
> > can
> > >>>>> see
> > >>>>>>> in code (not words) what the problems are with doing that.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> > >>>>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> > >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>
> > >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to