Hi Piotr, thanks for asking. Yes, if we want to try link Jewel is ok to link to others like HTML.
Carlos El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 10:56, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > I'm doing Maven build and HTML was failing. It is because it need to depend > again from Basic. I can make the changes. > > Carlos are you on that right now ? I don't want to collide with you. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 10:28 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > I'm available for you to help you solve. write me when you need. > > > > Just a note: for doing this, I'll take the following path: I'll try to > > compile and run without make Jewel depend on Basic, since is the actual > > shape. From there I'll try to link Basic. I think that path will provide > > you a more safe point from what you could go to next step. Just my advice > > if you want to take it. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 10:23, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) > > escribió: > > > > > OK. Everything compiles now. > > > > > > I’m going to run the branch against some applications and see what > > > happens. If you could do the same, it would be helpful. > > > > > > Carlos, I probably need some direction on how to test Jewel. > > > > > > Harbs > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok! Again good luck! :) > > > > > > > > pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:34 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > > > > > >> The issues that I see with Jewel are related to the changes that > were > > > lost > > > >> when you merged. > > > >> > > > >> I’m hoping I can resolve this quickly. Let’s see how over-optimistic > > I’m > > > >> being… ;-) > > > >> > > > >> Harbs > > > >> > > > >>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Harbs, > > > >>> > > > >>> There is also another way. Maybe it is worth that I will spend > couple > > > of > > > >>> hours on my branch and try to understand what was wrong. If I would > > > >> manage > > > >>> to do that - maybe you will be able to add your stuff on top of > that > > ? > > > Do > > > >>> you see value in that approach ? > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm just afraid that doing again Jewel depends on Basic end up > with a > > > lot > > > >>> of problems for you and delay for weeks that release. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Piotr > > > >>> > > > >>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> napisał(a): > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Harbs, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Looking forward to your changes. I'm just interested in release in > > > >>>> whatever state it is and dealing with discussion later on. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Btw. I have invested also at least 6h with merge stuff and as you > > can > > > >> see > > > >>>> it end up with bigger things. Good Luck! :) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Piotr > > > >>>> > > > >>>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Right now, my priority is getting all three active branches > > combined > > > >> with > > > >>>>> all code working. That means MX/Spark, Jewel, and all the > additions > > > on > > > >> the > > > >>>>> revert branch all coexisting nicely in the merge branch. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I’m spending the better part of today on that. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I’d like to hold off on discussing where to go from here until I > > > >>>>> understand the issues you went through with Jewel better. I > expect > > > I’m > > > >>>>> going to go through a lot of the pain you already went through > > > already > > > >>>>> getting Jewel to compile and work with the merges. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I might end up in the same place as you. Don’t know yet… > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I’m open to all possibilities. Even if we do separate > depenendies, > > > >> having > > > >>>>> the dependencies even temporarily *might* help resolve some of > the > > > >>>>> underlying technical issues. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Let’s discuss when I come up for air… ;-) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Harbs > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Rovira < > > carlosrov...@apache.org> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> considering making Jewel dependent on Basic. I'm trying to put > my > > > mind > > > >>>>> in > > > >>>>>> that place. Since this is a huge effort for me, hope you all try > > to > > > do > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>>> same as me and considering some thoughts, so we can plan > something > > > >> that > > > >>>>>> works for all: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Since Basic will be the middle point between Core and Jewel, can > > we > > > >>>>>> consider to move Basic CSS and TLCS to a BasicUI swc? So Basic > > could > > > >> be > > > >>>>>> really the common basic library and CSS doesn't mess Jewel > things? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> If so, we can go that router and test and discuss that > integration > > > in > > > >> a > > > >>>>>> separate branch and deal with all of that. > > > >>>>>> this will inevitably delay the release, but maybe is time to > solve > > > >> this > > > >>>>>> first. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> One of the things to do in the final result is to compile Jewel > > > (debug > > > >>>>> and > > > >>>>>> release) and comparte results on develop and results on > > integration > > > >>>>> branch > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Then we can decide what's better and release that > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thoughts? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 4:53, Alex Harui > > > >> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid > > > >>>>>> ) > > > >>>>>> escribió: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> FWIW, I agree with Harbs. Enough time has passed and changes > > have > > > >> been > > > >>>>>>> made that it is time to try making Jewel dependent on Basic so > we > > > can > > > >>>>> see > > > >>>>>>> in code (not words) what the problems are with doing that. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> My 2 cents, > > > >>>>>>> -Alex > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > > >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> Piotr Zarzycki > > > >>> > > > >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
