OK. Everything compiles now.

I’m going to run the branch against some applications and see what happens. If 
you could do the same, it would be helpful.

Carlos, I probably need some direction on how to test Jewel.

Harbs

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok! Again good luck! :)
> 
> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:34 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> 
>> The issues that I see with Jewel are related to the changes that were lost
>> when you merged.
>> 
>> I’m hoping I can resolve this quickly. Let’s see how over-optimistic I’m
>> being… ;-)
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Harbs,
>>> 
>>> There is also another way. Maybe it is worth that I will spend couple of
>>> hours on my branch and try to understand what was wrong. If I would
>> manage
>>> to do that - maybe you will be able to add your stuff on top of that ? Do
>>> you see value in that approach ?
>>> 
>>> I'm just afraid that doing again Jewel depends on Basic end up with a lot
>>> of problems for you and delay for weeks that release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>> 
>>>> Looking forward to your changes. I'm just interested in release in
>>>> whatever state it is and dealing with discussion later on.
>>>> 
>>>> Btw. I have invested also at least 6h with merge stuff and as you can
>> see
>>>> it end up with bigger things. Good Luck! :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Piotr
>>>> 
>>>> pon., 3 wrz 2018 o 09:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>> 
>>>>> Right now, my priority is getting all three active branches combined
>> with
>>>>> all code working. That means MX/Spark, Jewel, and all the additions on
>> the
>>>>> revert branch all coexisting nicely in the merge branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m spending the better part of today on that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’d like to hold off on discussing where to go from here until I
>>>>> understand the issues you went through with Jewel better. I expect I’m
>>>>> going to go through a lot of the pain you already went through already
>>>>> getting Jewel to compile and work with the merges.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I might end up in the same place as you. Don’t know yet…
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m open to all possibilities. Even if we do separate depenendies,
>> having
>>>>> the dependencies even temporarily *might* help resolve some of the
>>>>> underlying technical issues.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let’s discuss when I come up for air… ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Harbs
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> considering making Jewel dependent on Basic. I'm trying to put my mind
>>>>> in
>>>>>> that place. Since this is a huge effort for me, hope you all try to do
>>>>> the
>>>>>> same as me and considering some thoughts, so we can plan something
>> that
>>>>>> works for all:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Since Basic will be the middle point between Core and Jewel, can we
>>>>>> consider to move Basic CSS and TLCS to a BasicUI swc? So Basic could
>> be
>>>>>> really the common basic library and CSS doesn't mess Jewel things?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If so, we can go that router and test and discuss that integration in
>> a
>>>>>> separate branch and deal with all of that.
>>>>>> this will inevitably delay the release, but maybe is time to solve
>> this
>>>>>> first.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One of the things to do in the final result is to compile Jewel (debug
>>>>> and
>>>>>> release) and comparte results on develop and results on integration
>>>>> branch
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Then we can decide what's better and release that
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 4:53, Alex Harui
>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>>>>> )
>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> FWIW, I agree with Harbs.  Enough time has passed and changes have
>> been
>>>>>>> made that it is time to try making Jewel dependent on Basic so we can
>>>>> see
>>>>>>> in code (not words) what the problems are with doing that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>> 
>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> 
>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to