On 4/19/20, 11:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:08 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    wrote:
    
    > Congratulations!  But does that mean that JAVA_HOME is pointing at a JRE
    > instead of a JDK?  If you have other issues that might be a factor.
    >
    
    Yeah, I messed up initially by getting the JRE instead of JDK.  I have
    since corrected it.  But for some reason Ant still thinks that JAVA_HOME is
    the jre directory.
    I don't know how to fix this, hence the hack :-|
    
If you want to dig deeper, one idea is to run a Jenkins Job with a batch file 
that dumps out PATH and JAVA_HOME.  This post seems to imply that Ant may store 
info in .antrc and/or ant.conf files.

HTH,
-Alex
    
    
    
    >
    > HTH,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 4/19/20, 10:50 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     I copied tools.jar from  jdk/lib to the jre/lib.  That seems to have
    > fixed
    >     the issue.
    >     We now have a successful build of the royale-compiler on the new Agent
    >     machine!!
    >
    >     On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:44 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <
    > bigosma...@gmail.com>
    >     wrote:
    >
    >     > Restart dint help.  Although Serkan's reply made me look at how Ant
    > was
    >     > getting invoked.
    >     >
    >     > I see this warning that tools.jar is missing:
    >     >
    >     > [royale-compiler] $ cmd.exe /C
    > "C:\apache\apache-ant-1.9.9\bin\ant.bat -file jenkins.xml
    > -Denv.ASJS_HOME=C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs main && exit
    > %%ERRORLEVEL%%"
    >     >
    >     > Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in C:\Program
    > Files\Java\jre1.8.0_251\lib\tools.jar
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > I am pretty sure this is related to this issue.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:29 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <
    > bigosma...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:15 PM Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >> wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >>> Did you reboot your VM?  Also, have you checked what user is
    > running
    >     >>> Jenkins on your VM?  I think that can sometimes be a problem.  I
    > might be
    >     >>> running Jenkins as the user.
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >     >> Agents don't require Jenkins to be running.  I will give the
    > rebooting of
    >     >> the VM a shot .
    >     >>
    >     >> Thanks,
    >     >> Om
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>> -Alex
    >     >>>
    >     >>> On 4/19/20, 10:01 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
    >     >>> wrote:
    >     >>>
    >     >>>     On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 9:55 PM Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >>> wrote:
    >     >>>
    >     >>>     > Should be here:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2FconfigureTools%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239796954&amp;sdata=VBfhdjYkWvKLxPRasbxtkfkxJRGfGsyMf0w7EmaMQGY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >     >>>     My git is located in the same exact location as master.
    >     >>>     Moreover, the git call from the commandline executes fine.
    > The git
    >     >>> call
    >     >>>     from ant exec is what is failing.
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > HTH,
    >     >>>     > -Alex
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
    >     >>>     > Reply-To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <dev@royale.apache.org>
    >     >>>     > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM
    >     >>>     > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
    >     >>>     > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > I'm a bit stumped here.  The royale-compiler is failing with
    > this
    >     >>> error:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > BUILD FAILED
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\jenkins.xml:55: Execute
    >     >>> failed:
    >     >>>     > java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "git" (in directory
    >     >>>     > "c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler"): CreateProcess
    > error=2,
    >     >>> The system
    >     >>>     > cannot find the file specified
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >   at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(Unknown Source)
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > It is from this part of the jenkins.xml:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     <target name="closure-lib-download" description="Copies
    > Closure
    >     >>>     > Library from GitHub">
    >     >>>     >         <echo message="Be patient. This takes a few
    > minutes..." />
    >     >>>     >         <exec executable="git" failifexecutionfails="true">
    >     >>>     >             <arg value="clone" />
    >     >>>     >             <arg value="
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239796954&amp;sdata=Sc9D%2BW9cNuAmNCNvjWLAfbwCNq2YAeZ8cElretfYAoc%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>> <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239796954&amp;sdata=Sc9D%2BW9cNuAmNCNvjWLAfbwCNq2YAeZ8cElretfYAoc%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>> >"
    >     >>>     > />
    >     >>>     >             <arg value="${closure.root}" />
    >     >>>     >         </exec>
    >     >>>     >         <echo>Cloned fresh copy of Google Closure
    > Library</echo>
    >     >>>     >     </target>
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > I am not sure how this executable call works without the
    > full path.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > I checked the env variables, I do have both the git/bin and
    > git/cmd
    >     >>>     > directory in the PATH:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > [cid:ii_k97zkk9o0]
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > What am I missing?
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Thanks,
    >     >>>     > Om
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:54 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <
    >     >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >     >>>     > Update - I have successfully attached my VM as a slave agent
    > of our
    >     >>>     > Jenkins instance.
    >     >>>     > I am going to pull the job - /royale-asjs_jsonly and tie it
    > to my
    >     >>> agent so
    >     >>>     > I can test it.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > It will fail for a sometime while I go set up my VM with all
    > the
    >     >>>     > dependencies.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Once we have the job successfully building on my VM, we can
    > figure
    >     >>> out how
    >     >>>     > to divide the load between the master and agent.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Thanks,
    >     >>>     > Om
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:59 AM OmPrakash Muppirala <
    >     >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >     >>>     > We could achieve the same by creating a new agent (separate
    > vm) and
    >     >>>     > attaching it as a slave to the current Jenkins server.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Then we can use labels/tags to tie release jobs to one agent
    > and
    >     >>> non
    >     >>>     > release jobs to another agent.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > That way we can maintain everything in one UI, one login
    > while
    >     >>> achieving
    >     >>>     > the concurrent building capabilities we want.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Jenkins is built for this kind of stuff and I think it would
    > be
    >     >>> best we
    >     >>>     > followed this practice.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > Thanks,
    >     >>>     > Om
    >     >>>     > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 8:18 AM Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >>> wrote:
    >     >>>     > Om, I thought you were going to get the image from my VM and
    > run
    >     >>> it on
    >     >>>     > another VM.  Then we'd remove all non-release jobs from your
    > VM
    >     >>> and all of
    >     >>>     > the release jobs from my VM.  That won't solve the problem
    > of how
    >     >>> long it
    >     >>>     > takes for a commit to be built and tested, but will allow
    > the RM
    >     >>> to get a
    >     >>>     > release out without getting stuck behind the commit jobs.
    > Is that
    >     >>>     > currently the plan?
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > -Alex
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     > On 4/18/20, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
    > bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>> <mailto:
    >     >>>     > bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     Makes sense to me.  I will set parallel executors back
    > to 1.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     And start working on a new Jenkins instance.
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     Om
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 12:28 AM Alex Harui
    >     >>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >>>     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >     > Are you saying that Java, Ant and Maven do not know
    > how to
    >     >>>     > distribute work
    >     >>>     >     > to different cores?
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > To repeat my main concern:  our Jenkins jobs often use
    > shared
    >     >>>     > resources.
    >     >>>     >     > If you want to take the time to fix that, feel free,
    > but I
    >     >>> do not
    >     >>>     > know how
    >     >>>     >     > you are going to keep two jobs from both trying to
    > launch
    >     >>> Flash
    >     >>>     > Player
    >     >>>     >     > Debugger at the same time and open the same socket to
    >     >>> communicate
    >     >>>     > with it,
    >     >>>     >     > or try to parse the flashlog.txt that they have both
    > written
    >     >>> to.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > The royale-asjs job will use the royale-compiler
    > workspace
    >     >>> to get the
    >     >>>     >     > compiler.  If the compiler is building, the jars are
    > not
    >     >>> there and
    >     >>>     > the
    >     >>>     >     > royale-asjs build fails.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > There is also only so much memory and some of our jobs
    > use
    >     >>> all of it
    >     >>>     > and
    >     >>>     >     > I'm not sure if jobs slowed down due to paging memory
    > and
    >     >>>     > writing/reading
    >     >>>     >     > from disk, even if it is an SSD.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > I'm done for tonight, but that's what I was seeing
    > last time
    >     >>> I tried
    >     >>>     > to
    >     >>>     >     > have both master and an agent running jobs in 
parallel.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     > -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     > On 4/17/20, 11:52 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
    >     >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     A typical setup would be to have 0 executors on
    > master
    >     >>> and at
    >     >>>     > least n
    >     >>>     >     >     number of executors on each agent, where n =
    > number of
    >     >>> cpu cores.
    >     >>>     >     >     I see that the current VM has 2 cores.  So, I
    > started
    >     >>> with
    >     >>>     > setting the
    >     >>>     >     > num
    >     >>>     >     >     executors on the current agent to 2.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     This should improve things quite a bit.  If this
    > doesn't
    >     >>> work, I
    >     >>>     > will
    >     >>>     >     >     create a new VM and make it the slave agent of the
    >     >>> current
    >     >>>     > Jenkins
    >     >>>     >     > master.
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     >     Om
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:31 PM Alex Harui
    >     >>>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >>>     >     >     wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     > On your VM or mine?  I don't think mine can
    > handle
    >     >>> it.  I used
    >     >>>     > to
    >     >>>     >     > run jobs
    >     >>>     >     >     > of master and agent and we got lots of failures
    > and
    >     >>> jobs took
    >     >>>     >     > forever.  If
    >     >>>     >     >     > two jobs are trying to run tests with the shared
    > Flash
    >     >>> Player
    >     >>>     >     > Debugger, for
    >     >>>     >     >     > example, you won't get consistent results.
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     > -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     > On 4/17/20, 11:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
    >     >>>     > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     I just realized that we have only one Agent
    > (node)
    >     >>> listed
    >     >>>     > under
    >     >>>     >     >     > Jenkins.  I
    >     >>>     >     >     >     am going to add at least one more node to
    > start
    >     >>> with.
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     Om
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Harui
    >     >>>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >>>     >     >     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > I think I followed the instructions and
    > enabled
    >     >>> SSH.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > On 4/16/20, 9:37 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <
    >     >>>     > yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     I haven’t gotten it to work. Could be
    > ssh
    >     >>> needs to be
    >     >>>     >     > enabled on
    >     >>>     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > VM [1]. This is nice to have but not
    > essential.
    >     >>> So Alex,
    >     >>>     > let
    >     >>>     >     > me know
    >     >>>     >     >     > if you
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > want to try that, otherwise I’ll suspend 
my
    >     >>> efforts on
    >     >>>     > this.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     [1]
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239796954&amp;sdata=Vn2Vmc7Uhxn7lMnUqHzY4lzR0EhXw0tOfKoBomlfYlQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=RzwACbMA1ioqcOMrALKf0OmhLXC16UhyWscF6IXGZlk%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:
    >     >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:09 
PM
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs
    > on CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     I’d like to try and install an ssh
    > server.
    >     >>> Can anyone
    >     >>>     >     > think of a
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > reason not to do that? I’m asking in terms
    > of
    >     >>> security,
    >     >>>     > and if
    >     >>>     >     > there
    >     >>>     >     >     > might
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > be a problem because it’s a VM.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Thanks.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:
    >     >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:02 AM
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs
    > on CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Related, as most (all?) of the
    > instructions
    >     >>> don’t
    >     >>>     > require
    >     >>>     >     >     > anything but
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > a shell wouldn’t it be easier and faster 
to
    >     >>> access the
    >     >>>     > machine
    >     >>>     >     > with
    >     >>>     >     >     > ssh
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > [1], rather than using remote desktop?
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     [1]
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=twNTFDLGdeM7%2BVnNozwE9lKXHMUaGNA8NnqFAiLEjQ4%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=twNTFDLGdeM7%2BVnNozwE9lKXHMUaGNA8NnqFAiLEjQ4%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:
    >     >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:55 AM
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:
    >     >>>     > dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs
    > on CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Can’t you do that with remote desktop?
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     ________________________________
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     From: OmPrakash Muppirala <
    >     >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>>     > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:51:25 
AM
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     To: Apache Royale Development <
    >     >>> dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >>>     > <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs
    > on CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Alex,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     I believe this is your personal Azure
    >     >>> subscription
    >     >>>     > right?
    >     >>>     >     > Any
    >     >>>     >     >     > chance
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > I can
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     get access to it so I can try to copy
    > the
    >     >>> image out
    >     >>>     > the
    >     >>>     >     > machine
    >     >>>     >     >     > and
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     redeploy it somewhere else?
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     Om
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:18 PM
    > OmPrakash
    >     >>> Muppirala <
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:
    > bigosma...@gmail.com
    >     >>> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     > I can help set this up on Azure.
    > Give me
    >     >>> some
    >     >>>     > time to
    >     >>>     >     > work
    >     >>>     >     >     > out the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     > details?
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     > Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     > Om
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, 11:49 AM Harbs
    > <
    >     >>>     >     > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> OK. Good to know.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> > On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:45 PM, Alex
    > Harui
    >     >>>     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> > FWIW, I just looked and the
    > longest job
    >     >>> in the
    >     >>>     > release
    >     >>>     >     >     > steps so
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > far is
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> 8 minutes.  Most are under 2
    > minutes.
    >     >>> There
    >     >>>     > might be
    >     >>>     >     > jobs
    >     >>>     >     >     > later
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > that take
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> longer that we haven't run yet.
    > IMO, the
    >     >>> issue
    >     >>>     > isn't
    >     >>>     >     > speed
    >     >>>     >     >     > of the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > machine,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> it is just that we are sharing the
    >     >>> machine with
    >     >>>     > longer
    >     >>>     >     > jobs
    >     >>>     >     >     > (1 hour
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > for
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> TourDeFlexMigration).  And again,
    > the
    >     >>> machine
    >     >>>     > will be
    >     >>>     >     > idle for
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > stretches of
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> time while the RM verifies 
artifacts
    >     >>> after each
    >     >>>     > step.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> > -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> > On 4/12/20, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >>>     >     >     > <mailto:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    Fair enough.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    I expect builds to be 
somewhere
    >     >>> between 10
    >     >>>     > and 20
    >     >>>     >     > times
    >     >>>     >     >     > faster
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > on a
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> powerful machine.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    Yeah. It’s probably going to
    > be a
    >     >>> bit of work
    >     >>>     >     > changing
    >     >>>     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > server,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> but probably worth it in the long
    > run.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    I think I’ll try this when I
    > do the
    >     >>> next
    >     >>>     > release
    >     >>>     >     > unless
    >     >>>     >     >     > Yishay
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > wants
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> to work with me on this for this
    > release
    >     >>> — but
    >     >>>     > I’m not
    >     >>>     >     > going
    >     >>>     >     >     > to be
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > able to
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> help until after Passover (i.e. 
next
    >     >>> week).
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    Thanks,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >    Harbs
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >> On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:22 PM,
    > Alex Harui
    >     >>>     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >> The Azure portal says: Standard
    > F2s_v2
    >     >>> (2
    >     >>>     > vcpus, 4
    >     >>>     >     > GiB
    >     >>>     >     >     > memory)
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >> I think I am reading changes to
    > the
    >     >>> build
    >     >>>     > process in
    >     >>>     >     > your
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> suggestions.  I do not really want
    > to
    >     >>> spend more
    >     >>>     > of my
    >     >>>     >     > time
    >     >>>     >     >     > on this
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> process.  But if you want to do the
    > work,
    >     >>> that's
    >     >>>     > fine
    >     >>>     >     > with me.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >> -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >> On 4/12/20, 10:57 AM, "Harbs" <
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >>>     >     >     > <mailto:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com
    > <mailto:
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >>>     >     > <mailto:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>   What kind of horsepower is
    > included
    >     >>> in the
    >     >>>     > free
    >     >>>     >     > Azure
    >     >>>     >     >     > account?
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>   The server I mentioned builds
    >     >>> (considerably)
    >     >>>     >     > faster than
    >     >>>     >     >     > my own
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> local machine. The ci server seems
    > to
    >     >>> build many
    >     >>>     > times
    >     >>>     >     > slower.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>   One thing we can do to 
minimize
    >     >>> running
    >     >>>     > server time
    >     >>>     >     >     > would be to
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> transfer the artifacts to storage
    > instead
    >     >>> of
    >     >>>     > keeping
    >     >>>     >     > them on
    >     >>>     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > server. On
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> AWS, I’d probably use S3. Not sure
    > what
    >     >>> the
    >     >>>     > similar
    >     >>>     >     > service on
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > Azure is
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> called.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 8:26 PM,
    > Alex
    >     >>> Harui
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    > <mailto:
    >     >>>     > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>> OK, that's pretty much how I
    >     >>> understand Azure
    >     >>>     > as
    >     >>>     >     > well.
    >     >>>     >     >     > The key
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > thing
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> is that "running" includes time
    > where the
    >     >>> CI
    >     >>>     > server is
    >     >>>     >     > not
    >     >>>     >     >     > running
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > any
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> Jenkins jobs.  The CI Server steps
    > might
    >     >>> take
    >     >>>     > only a few
    >     >>>     >     >     > hours of
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > actual
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> server time, but there is time
    > where the
    >     >>> RM is
    >     >>>     > verifying
    >     >>>     >     >     > artifacts
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > locally
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> so you'd be paying for that or the
    > RM
    >     >>> would have
    >     >>>     > to keep
    >     >>>     >     >     > shutting
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > down and
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> restarting.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>> Seems like it would be
    >     >>> cheaper/simpler to get
    >     >>>     > the
    >     >>>     >     > free
    >     >>>     >     >     > MSDN
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > account
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> and leave it running.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>> -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>> On 4/12/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs" <
    >     >>>     >     > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >>>     >     >     > <mailto:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
    >     >>>     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  My experience is with AWS.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  I assume Microsoft has similar
    >     >>> offerings,
    >     >>>     > but I
    >     >>>     >     > don’t
    >     >>>     >     >     > have
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> experience with Azure.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  AWS has on-demand EC2 
instances
    >     >>> which you
    >     >>>     > pay for
    >     >>>     >     > only
    >     >>>     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > actual
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> time that they are running.[1]
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  Instances can be started and
    > stopped
    >     >>> via
    >     >>>     > command
    >     >>>     >     > line
    >     >>>     >     >     > (or via
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> web interface) as long as you have
    > valid
    >     >>>     > credentials to
    >     >>>     >     > do so.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  For example: an m5.4xlarge
    > instance
    >     >>> has 16
    >     >>>     > cores
    >     >>>     >     > and
    >     >>>     >     >     > costs
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > about
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> $1.5 per hour. On a machine like
    > that, a
    >     >>> full
    >     >>>     > build
    >     >>>     >     > would
    >     >>>     >     >     > probably
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > take
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> less than 10 minutes. It’s probably
    >     >>> possible to
    >     >>>     > do a
    >     >>>     >     > full
    >     >>>     >     >     > release
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > with only
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> a few hours of server time.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  Leaving a server like that
    > running
    >     >>> all the
    >     >>>     > time
    >     >>>     >     > would get
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > expensive,
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> but if it’s just spun up for
    > releases,
    >     >>> you’d get
    >     >>>     > very
    >     >>>     >     > fast
    >     >>>     >     >     > builds
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > at a
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> reasonable price.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  I’d be happy to pay $10-$50
    > (and
    >     >>> possibly
    >     >>>     > more) per
    >     >>>     >     >     > release to
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > make
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> the release process painless for
    > the RM.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>  [1]
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> <
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> ><
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> <
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239806944&amp;sdata=rgPi%2FDJRjgiuwnQtlh9I7GyPnl2ul4S13MqzUiZv23o%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >><
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> <
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> ><
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> <
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > <
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C064142121e184b7a721f08d7e4f39a91%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229607239816937&amp;sdata=OR5bL2ZdtT%2F44eMdGoM9QlBIj8vst1qaezMUy79iQUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >>>     > >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:45 PM,
    > Alex
    >     >>> Harui
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> I'm not very experienced with
    >     >>> spinning up
    >     >>>     >     > servers.  The
    >     >>>     >     >     > CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > server we
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> are using is effectively free,
    > based on a
    >     >>> generous
    >     >>>     >     > donation
    >     >>>     >     >     > from
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > Microsoft
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> of MSDN accounts to ASF
    > committers.  So I
    >     >>> leave
    >     >>>     > it up
    >     >>>     >     > 24/7,
    >     >>>     >     >     > and
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > share the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> RDP access on private@.  I think
    > any
    >     >>> other ASF
    >     >>>     >     > committer
    >     >>>     >     >     > could do
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > the
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> same.  IIRC, if that server
    > actually is
    >     >>> stopped,
    >     >>>     > I have
    >     >>>     >     > to
    >     >>>     >     >     > use my
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > personal
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> (unshared) MSDN credentials to
    > start it
    >     >>> again.
    >     >>>     >  AIUI,
    >     >>>     >     > if I
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > actually paid
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> for the server, it would cost me to
    > leave
    >     >>> it
    >     >>>     > running
    >     >>>     >     > even if
    >     >>>     >     >     > it
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > didn't run
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> jobs between releases.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> Is that what you are basically
    >     >>> saying?  I
    >     >>>     > think it
    >     >>>     >     > might
    >     >>>     >     >     > be
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > best if
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> another committer got a CI server
    > going
    >     >>> via the MS
    >     >>>     >     > donation
    >     >>>     >     >     > and
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > could leave
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> it up 24/7.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> -Alex
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> On 4/12/20, 9:28 AM, "Harbs" <
    >     >>>     >     > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
    >     >>>     >     >     > wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> I’m willing to do this.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> Considering that the release
    > will be
    >     >>> run
    >     >>>     >     > infrequently, it
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > should be
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> doable to have a relatively 
powerful
    >     >>> server that
    >     >>>     > could
    >     >>>     >     > be
    >     >>>     >     >     > spun up on
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> demand. This is something I have
    > setup
    >     >>> for my own
    >     >>>     >     > releases.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> The only complication would be
    > that
    >     >>> each RM
    >     >>>     > would
    >     >>>     >     > need
    >     >>>     >     >     > valid
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> credentials to spin up the server.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>> Harbs
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:10 PM,
    > Alex
    >     >>> Harui
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> >>>>> A better solution, IMO, is 
for
    >     >>> someone else
    >     >>>     > to
    >     >>>     >     > offer up
    >     >>>     >     >     > a CI
    >     >>>     >     >     >     > server
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >> only for release jobs.
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >     >>
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>     >
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >     >>>
    >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to