Also, once royale-asjs completes, it is going to kick off lots of other jobs on
agent 1 that will compete with the release jobs. Ideally, all non-release jobs
would be moved over to the new agent VM.
-Alex
On 4/20/20, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
Yes, royale-asjs (which is currently building on agent1 and blocking the
release job).
-Alex
On 4/20/20, 10:53 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Update - royale-asjs_jsonly successfully build on my agent VM.
Right now, we have 3 jobs running on this VM:
1. royale-asjs_jsonly
2. royale-compiler
3. royale-typedefs
Are there any other jobs we need to move to the new agent?
Yishay, can you please confirm that your release jobs are running
without
being hindered by CI jobs?
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:05 AM OmPrakash Muppirala
<bigosma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:01 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I see compiler-jx/lib in the Workspace for royale-compiler on my VM.
If
>> you are talking about your VM, you can compare console output from
recent
>> successful builds on both VMs.
>>
>>
> I was talking about my VM.
> A rebuild of royale-compiler seems to have fixed that problem. Now
> royale-typedefs passes as well!
>
> Next up royale-asjs_jsonly...
>
>
>> I'm done for tonight. Good luck,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/19/20, 11:50 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:37 PM Alex Harui
<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Royale-compiler has to be built first. This is an example of
shared
>> > resources that I mentioned upthread. Royale-typedefs is going
to
>> look for
>> > a sibling workspace folder called royale-compiler with a built
of
>> > royale-compiler in it. If royale-compiler fails to create all
of
>> its
>> > binaries or is in the process of building them, royale-typedefs
>> will report
>> > an error.
>> >
>>
>> Got it. I was just looking at the logic here:
>>
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-typedefs%2Fblob%2F85c74dde104294a0127ce46a8795d7534216e7eb%2Fjs%2Fbuild.xml%23L53&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126971265&sdata=QPt6lvVwPBgoVhmAg8%2B%2FeiBxjq9%2FHYLreIG2brTGfuE%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Weird. The royale-compiler build says it was successful, but I
cant
>> find
>> the lib directory under
>> C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > What should probably happen is that royale-typedefs pulls down
the
>> > lastsuccessfulartifacts from royale-compiler, but I've never
found
>> enough
>> > time and energy to try to make changes like that since most of
us
>> do have
>> > all of the folders as siblings.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 4/19/20, 11:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
<bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am now getting this error on royale-typedefs build:
>> >
>> > BUILD
FAILEDc:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs\build.xml:58:
>> The
>> > following error occurred while executing this line:
>> > c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs\js\build.xml:91: src
>> >
>> >
>>
'c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs\js\${ROYALE_TRANSPILER_HOME}\lib\google\closure-compiler\compiler.jar'
>> > doesn't exist.
>> >
>> >
>> > Where does the ROYALE_TRANSPILER_HOME var come from?
>> >
>> > Here is the full console output:
>> >
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fview%2FAgent%25202%2520&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=CgDdnMTfn3BVaF5eLt%2BX4rAX3gdpsb4MPT4jR97aLB8%3D&reserved=0(Om's%20VM)/job/royale-typedefs/552/console
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:24 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> > bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:08 PM Alex Harui
>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Congratulations! But does that mean that JAVA_HOME is
>> pointing at
>> > a JRE
>> > >> instead of a JDK? If you have other issues that might
be a
>> factor.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Yeah, I messed up initially by getting the JRE instead of
>> JDK. I
>> > have
>> > > since corrected it. But for some reason Ant still
thinks that
>> > JAVA_HOME is
>> > > the jre directory.
>> > > I don't know how to fix this, hence the hack :-|
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> HTH,
>> > >> -Alex
>> > >>
>> > >> On 4/19/20, 10:50 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> I copied tools.jar from jdk/lib to the jre/lib.
That
>> seems to
>> > have
>> > >> fixed
>> > >> the issue.
>> > >> We now have a successful build of the
royale-compiler on
>> the
>> > new Agent
>> > >> machine!!
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:44 PM OmPrakash
Muppirala <
>> > >> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Restart dint help. Although Serkan's reply made
me
>> look at
>> > how Ant
>> > >> was
>> > >> > getting invoked.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I see this warning that tools.jar is missing:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [royale-compiler] $ cmd.exe /C
>> > >> "C:\apache\apache-ant-1.9.9\bin\ant.bat -file
jenkins.xml
>> > >> -Denv.ASJS_HOME=C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs main
&& exit
>> > >> %%ERRORLEVEL%%"
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in
>> C:\Program
>> > >> Files\Java\jre1.8.0_251\lib\tools.jar
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I am pretty sure this is related to this issue.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:29 PM OmPrakash
Muppirala <
>> > >> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:15 PM Alex Harui
>> > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Did you reboot your VM? Also, have you checked
what
>> user is
>> > >> running
>> > >> >>> Jenkins on your VM? I think that can sometimes
be a
>> > problem. I
>> > >> might be
>> > >> >>> running Jenkins as the user.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >> Agents don't require Jenkins to be running. I
will
>> give the
>> > >> rebooting of
>> > >> >> the VM a shot .
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Thanks,
>> > >> >> Om
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> -Alex
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On 4/19/20, 10:01 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>> > bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 9:55 PM Alex Harui
>> > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > Should be here:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2FconfigureTools%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=wmUYQ8yANnUuo4i%2F7FXqjsPwQzd4bL%2Bh4gUoR3xa%2BIA%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> My git is located in the same exact
location as
>> master.
>> > >> >>> Moreover, the git call from the commandline
>> executes
>> > fine.
>> > >> The git
>> > >> >>> call
>> > >> >>> from ant exec is what is failing.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > HTH,
>> > >> >>> > -Alex
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > From: OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > Reply-To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <
>> > dev@royale.apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM
>> > >> >>> > To: Apache Royale Development <
>> dev@royale.apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > I'm a bit stumped here. The
royale-compiler is
>> > failing
>> > >> with this
>> > >> >>> error:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > BUILD FAILED
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\jenkins.xml:55:
>> > Execute
>> > >> >>> failed:
>> > >> >>> > java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
"git"
>> (in
>> > directory
>> > >> >>> > "c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler"):
>> CreateProcess
>> > >> error=2,
>> > >> >>> The system
>> > >> >>> > cannot find the file specified
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > at
java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(Unknown
>> Source)
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > It is from this part of the jenkins.xml:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > <target name="closure-lib-download"
>> > description="Copies
>> > >> Closure
>> > >> >>> > Library from GitHub">
>> > >> >>> > <echo message="Be patient. This
takes
>> a few
>> > >> minutes..." />
>> > >> >>> > <exec executable="git"
>> > failifexecutionfails="true">
>> > >> >>> > <arg value="clone" />
>> > >> >>> > <arg value="
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=aaSDpyVpWdqmVar4s8SJuKUDYRzuhwQ8J6%2BZCcpO56c%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=aaSDpyVpWdqmVar4s8SJuKUDYRzuhwQ8J6%2BZCcpO56c%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> >"
>> > >> >>> > />
>> > >> >>> > <arg value="${closure.root}"
/>
>> > >> >>> > </exec>
>> > >> >>> > <echo>Cloned fresh copy of Google
>> Closure
>> > >> Library</echo>
>> > >> >>> > </target>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > I am not sure how this executable call
works
>> without
>> > the
>> > >> full path.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > I checked the env variables, I do have
both the
>> > git/bin and
>> > >> git/cmd
>> > >> >>> > directory in the PATH:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > [cid:ii_k97zkk9o0]
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > What am I missing?
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > Om
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:54 PM OmPrakash
>> Muppirala <
>> > >> >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > Update - I have successfully attached my
VM as
>> a slave
>> > >> agent of our
>> > >> >>> > Jenkins instance.
>> > >> >>> > I am going to pull the job -
>> /royale-asjs_jsonly and
>> > tie it
>> > >> to my
>> > >> >>> agent so
>> > >> >>> > I can test it.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > It will fail for a sometime while I go
set up
>> my VM
>> > with
>> > >> all the
>> > >> >>> > dependencies.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Once we have the job successfully
building on
>> my VM,
>> > we can
>> > >> figure
>> > >> >>> out how
>> > >> >>> > to divide the load between the master and
>> agent.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > Om
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:59 AM OmPrakash
>> Muppirala <
>> > >> >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > We could achieve the same by creating a
new
>> agent
>> > (separate
>> > >> vm) and
>> > >> >>> > attaching it as a slave to the current
Jenkins
>> server.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Then we can use labels/tags to tie release
>> jobs to one
>> > >> agent and
>> > >> >>> non
>> > >> >>> > release jobs to another agent.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > That way we can maintain everything in
one UI,
>> one
>> > login
>> > >> while
>> > >> >>> achieving
>> > >> >>> > the concurrent building capabilities we
want.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Jenkins is built for this kind of stuff
and I
>> think it
>> > >> would be
>> > >> >>> best we
>> > >> >>> > followed this practice.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > Om
>> > >> >>> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 8:18 AM Alex Harui
>> > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > Om, I thought you were going to get the
image
>> from my
>> > VM
>> > >> and run
>> > >> >>> it on
>> > >> >>> > another VM. Then we'd remove all
non-release
>> jobs
>> > from
>> > >> your VM
>> > >> >>> and all of
>> > >> >>> > the release jobs from my VM. That won't
solve
>> the
>> > problem
>> > >> of how
>> > >> >>> long it
>> > >> >>> > takes for a commit to be built and
tested, but
>> will
>> > allow
>> > >> the RM
>> > >> >>> to get a
>> > >> >>> > release out without getting stuck behind
the
>> commit
>> > jobs.
>> > >> Is that
>> > >> >>> > currently the plan?
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > -Alex
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On 4/18/20, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash
Muppirala" <
>> > >> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Makes sense to me. I will set
parallel
>> executors
>> > back
>> > >> to 1.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > And start working on a new Jenkins
>> instance.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > Om
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 12:28 AM Alex
Harui
>> > >> >>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > > Are you saying that Java, Ant and
Maven
>> do not
>> > know
>> > >> how to
>> > >> >>> > distribute work
>> > >> >>> > > to different cores?
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > To repeat my main concern: our
Jenkins
>> jobs
>> > often
>> > >> use shared
>> > >> >>> > resources.
>> > >> >>> > > If you want to take the time to fix
>> that, feel
>> > free,
>> > >> but I
>> > >> >>> do not
>> > >> >>> > know how
>> > >> >>> > > you are going to keep two jobs from
both
>> trying
>> > to
>> > >> launch
>> > >> >>> Flash
>> > >> >>> > Player
>> > >> >>> > > Debugger at the same time and open
the
>> same
>> > socket to
>> > >> >>> communicate
>> > >> >>> > with it,
>> > >> >>> > > or try to parse the flashlog.txt
that
>> they have
>> > both
>> > >> written
>> > >> >>> to.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > The royale-asjs job will use the
>> royale-compiler
>> > >> workspace
>> > >> >>> to get the
>> > >> >>> > > compiler. If the compiler is
building,
>> the
>> > jars are
>> > >> not
>> > >> >>> there and
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > > royale-asjs build fails.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > There is also only so much memory
and
>> some of
>> > our
>> > >> jobs use
>> > >> >>> all of it
>> > >> >>> > and
>> > >> >>> > > I'm not sure if jobs slowed down
due to
>> paging
>> > memory
>> > >> and
>> > >> >>> > writing/reading
>> > >> >>> > > from disk, even if it is an SSD.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > I'm done for tonight, but that's
what I
>> was
>> > seeing
>> > >> last time
>> > >> >>> I tried
>> > >> >>> > to
>> > >> >>> > > have both master and an agent
running
>> jobs in
>> > >> parallel.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > -Alex
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > On 4/17/20, 11:52 PM, "OmPrakash
>> Muppirala" <
>> > >> >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > A typical setup would be to
have 0
>> > executors on
>> > >> master
>> > >> >>> and at
>> > >> >>> > least n
>> > >> >>> > > number of executors on each
agent,
>> where n =
>> > >> number of
>> > >> >>> cpu cores.
>> > >> >>> > > I see that the current VM has 2
>> cores. So,
>> > I
>> > >> started
>> > >> >>> with
>> > >> >>> > setting the
>> > >> >>> > > num
>> > >> >>> > > executors on the current agent
to 2.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > This should improve things
quite a
>> bit. If
>> > this
>> > >> doesn't
>> > >> >>> work, I
>> > >> >>> > will
>> > >> >>> > > create a new VM and make it the
>> slave agent
>> > of the
>> > >> >>> current
>> > >> >>> > Jenkins
>> > >> >>> > > master.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > Om
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:31 PM
>> Alex Harui
>> > >> >>> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > On your VM or mine? I don't
think
>> mine
>> > can
>> > >> handle
>> > >> >>> it. I used
>> > >> >>> > to
>> > >> >>> > > run jobs
>> > >> >>> > > > of master and agent and we got
>> lots of
>> > failures
>> > >> and
>> > >> >>> jobs took
>> > >> >>> > > forever. If
>> > >> >>> > > > two jobs are trying to run
tests
>> with the
>> > >> shared Flash
>> > >> >>> Player
>> > >> >>> > > Debugger, for
>> > >> >>> > > > example, you won't get
consistent
>> results.
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > -Alex
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > On 4/17/20, 11:23 PM,
"OmPrakash
>> > Muppirala" <
>> > >> >>> > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > I just realized that we
have
>> only one
>> > Agent
>> > >> (node)
>> > >> >>> listed
>> > >> >>> > under
>> > >> >>> > > > Jenkins. I
>> > >> >>> > > > am going to add at least
one
>> more
>> > node to
>> > >> start
>> > >> >>> with.
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > > Om
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at
9:58
>> AM Alex
>> > Harui
>> > >> >>> > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> > >> >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > I think I followed the
>> instructions
>> > and
>> > >> enabled
>> > >> >>> SSH.
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > On 4/16/20, 9:37 AM,
"Yishay
>> Weiss"
>> > <
>> > >> >>> > yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:
>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > I haven’t gotten it
to
>> work.
>> > Could be
>> > >> ssh
>> > >> >>> needs to be
>> > >> >>> > > enabled on
>> > >> >>> > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > VM [1]. This is nice to
have
>> but not
>> > >> essential.
>> > >> >>> So Alex,
>> > >> >>> > let
>> > >> >>> > > me know
>> > >> >>> > > > if you
>> > >> >>> > > > > want to try that,
otherwise
>> I’ll
>> > suspend
>> > >> my
>> > >> >>> efforts on
>> > >> >>> > this.
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > [1]
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=jSJ2d3k5CINKvWLZBZtymV641%2Fx%2BXnMnvLnThs74%2F%2Bo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=jSJ2d3k5CINKvWLZBZtymV641%2Fx%2BXnMnvLnThs74%2F%2Bo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > From: Yishay
>> Weiss<mailto:
>> > >> >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Sent: Wednesday,
April
>> 15, 2020
>> > 5:09
>> > >> PM
>> > >> >>> > > > > To:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Subject: RE:
Prioritize
>> Release
>> > Jobs
>> > >> on CI
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > I’d like to try and
>> install an
>> > ssh
>> > >> server.
>> > >> >>> Can anyone
>> > >> >>> > > think of a
>> > >> >>> > > > > reason not to do that?
I’m
>> asking in
>> > >> terms of
>> > >> >>> security,
>> > >> >>> > and if
>> > >> >>> > > there
>> > >> >>> > > > might
>> > >> >>> > > > > be a problem because
it’s a
>> VM.
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > Thanks.
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > From: Yishay
>> Weiss<mailto:
>> > >> >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April
13,
>> 2020
>> > 10:02 AM
>> > >> >>> > > > > To:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Subject: RE:
Prioritize
>> Release
>> > Jobs
>> > >> on CI
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > Related, as most
(all?)
>> of the
>> > >> instructions
>> > >> >>> don’t
>> > >> >>> > require
>> > >> >>> > > > anything but
>> > >> >>> > > > > a shell wouldn’t it be
>> easier and
>> > faster
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> access the
>> > >> >>> > machine
>> > >> >>> > > with
>> > >> >>> > > > ssh
>> > >> >>> > > > > [1], rather than using
remote
>> > desktop?
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > [1]
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126981256&sdata=q31IZr4su8m1osIy5KdPVmA8ZZ88UWmfJ0qNl%2B%2B%2F63o%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=Pwl5XmRxqfdJi%2F5elh6A2hgNZTX2JFnandVf7TVtMzc%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > From: Yishay
>> Weiss<mailto:
>> > >> >>> yishayj...@hotmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April
13,
>> 2020
>> > 9:55 AM
>> > >> >>> > > > > To:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > dev@royale.apache.org>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Subject: RE:
Prioritize
>> Release
>> > Jobs
>> > >> on CI
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > Can’t you do that
with
>> remote
>> > desktop?
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> ________________________________
>> > >> >>> > > > > From: OmPrakash
>> Muppirala <
>> > >> >>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Sent: Monday, April
13,
>> 2020
>> > 9:51:25
>> > >> AM
>> > >> >>> > > > > To: Apache Royale
>> Development <
>> > >> >>> dev@royale.apache.org
>> > >> >>> > <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > Subject: Re:
Prioritize
>> Release
>> > Jobs
>> > >> on CI
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > Alex,
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > I believe this is
your
>> personal
>> > Azure
>> > >> >>> subscription
>> > >> >>> > right?
>> > >> >>> > > Any
>> > >> >>> > > > chance
>> > >> >>> > > > > I can
>> > >> >>> > > > > get access to it so
I
>> can try
>> > to copy
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> image out
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > > machine
>> > >> >>> > > > and
>> > >> >>> > > > > redeploy it
somewhere
>> else?
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > > > Om
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > On Sun, Apr 12,
2020 at
>> 6:18 PM
>> > >> OmPrakash
>> > >> >>> Muppirala <
>> > >> >>> > > > >
bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> > >> bigosma...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > > I can help set
this up
>> on
>> > Azure.
>> > >> Give me
>> > >> >>> some
>> > >> >>> > time to
>> > >> >>> > > work
>> > >> >>> > > > out the
>> > >> >>> > > > > > details?
>> > >> >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > > > > Om
>> > >> >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12,
2020,
>> 11:49 AM
>> > >> Harbs <
>> > >> >>> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> OK. Good to know.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Apr 12,
2020, at
>> 9:45
>> > PM,
>> > >> Alex Harui
>> > >> >>> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > >> >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > FWIW, I just
looked
>> and the
>> > >> longest job
>> > >> >>> in the
>> > >> >>> > release
>> > >> >>> > > > steps so
>> > >> >>> > > > > far is
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> 8 minutes. Most
are
>> under 2
>> > >> minutes.
>> > >> >>> There
>> > >> >>> > might be
>> > >> >>> > > jobs
>> > >> >>> > > > later
>> > >> >>> > > > > that take
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> longer that we
>> haven't run
>> > yet.
>> > >> IMO, the
>> > >> >>> issue
>> > >> >>> > isn't
>> > >> >>> > > speed
>> > >> >>> > > > of the
>> > >> >>> > > > > machine,
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> it is just that
we are
>> > sharing the
>> > >> >>> machine with
>> > >> >>> > longer
>> > >> >>> > > jobs
>> > >> >>> > > > (1 hour
>> > >> >>> > > > > for
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> TourDeFlexMigration). And
>> > again,
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> machine
>> > >> >>> > will be
>> > >> >>> > > idle for
>> > >> >>> > > > > stretches of
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> time while the RM
>> verifies
>> > >> artifacts
>> > >> >>> after each
>> > >> >>> > step.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > -Alex
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > On 4/12/20,
11:32
>> AM,
>> > "Harbs" <
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > > > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
harbs.li...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Fair enough.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > I expect
builds
>> to be
>> > >> somewhere
>> > >> >>> between 10
>> > >> >>> > and 20
>> > >> >>> > > times
>> > >> >>> > > > faster
>> > >> >>> > > > > on a
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> powerful machine.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Yeah. It’s
>> probably
>> > going to
>> > >> be a
>> > >> >>> bit of work
>> > >> >>> > > changing
>> > >> >>> > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > server,
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> but probably
worth it
>> in the
>> > long
>> > >> run.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > I think
I’ll try
>> this
>> > when I
>> > >> do the
>> > >> >>> next
>> > >> >>> > release
>> > >> >>> > > unless
>> > >> >>> > > > Yishay
>> > >> >>> > > > > wants
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> to work with me
on
>> this for
>> > this
>> > >> release
>> > >> >>> — but
>> > >> >>> > I’m not
>> > >> >>> > > going
>> > >> >>> > > > to be
>> > >> >>> > > > > able to
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> help until after
>> Passover
>> > (i.e.
>> > >> next
>> > >> >>> week).
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Harbs
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> On Apr 12,
2020,
>> at 9:22
>> > PM,
>> > >> Alex Harui
>> > >> >>> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > >> >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> The Azure
portal
>> says:
>> > Standard
>> > >> F2s_v2
>> > >> >>> (2
>> > >> >>> > vcpus, 4
>> > >> >>> > > GiB
>> > >> >>> > > > memory)
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> I think I am
>> reading
>> > changes to
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> build
>> > >> >>> > process in
>> > >> >>> > > your
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> suggestions. I
do not
>> > really want
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> spend more
>> > >> >>> > of my
>> > >> >>> > > time
>> > >> >>> > > > on this
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> process. But if
you
>> want to
>> > do
>> > >> the work,
>> > >> >>> that's
>> > >> >>> > fine
>> > >> >>> > > with me.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> -Alex
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> On 4/12/20,
10:57
>> AM,
>> > "Harbs" <
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > > > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
harbs.li...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> <mailto:
>> harbs.li...@gmail.com
>> > >> <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
harbs.li...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> What kind of
>> horsepower
>> > is
>> > >> included
>> > >> >>> in the
>> > >> >>> > free
>> > >> >>> > > Azure
>> > >> >>> > > > account?
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> The server I
>> mentioned
>> > builds
>> > >> >>> (considerably)
>> > >> >>> > > faster than
>> > >> >>> > > > my own
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> local machine.
The ci
>> server
>> > seems
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> build many
>> > >> >>> > times
>> > >> >>> > > slower.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> One thing
we can
>> do to
>> > >> minimize
>> > >> >>> running
>> > >> >>> > server time
>> > >> >>> > > > would be to
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> transfer the
>> artifacts to
>> > storage
>> > >> instead
>> > >> >>> of
>> > >> >>> > keeping
>> > >> >>> > > them on
>> > >> >>> > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > server. On
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> AWS, I’d
probably use
>> S3.
>> > Not sure
>> > >> what
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> > similar
>> > >> >>> > > service on
>> > >> >>> > > > > Azure is
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> called.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On Apr 12,
2020,
>> at 8:26
>> > PM,
>> > >> Alex
>> > >> >>> Harui
>> > >> >>> > > > >
<aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> <mailto:
>> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > >> <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> OK, that's
pretty
>> much
>> > how I
>> > >> >>> understand Azure
>> > >> >>> > as
>> > >> >>> > > well.
>> > >> >>> > > > The key
>> > >> >>> > > > > thing
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> is that "running"
>> includes
>> > time
>> > >> where the
>> > >> >>> CI
>> > >> >>> > server is
>> > >> >>> > > not
>> > >> >>> > > > running
>> > >> >>> > > > > any
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> Jenkins jobs.
The CI
>> Server
>> > steps
>> > >> might
>> > >> >>> take
>> > >> >>> > only a few
>> > >> >>> > > > hours of
>> > >> >>> > > > > actual
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> server time, but
>> there is
>> > time
>> > >> where the
>> > >> >>> RM is
>> > >> >>> > verifying
>> > >> >>> > > > artifacts
>> > >> >>> > > > > locally
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> so you'd be
paying
>> for that
>> > or the
>> > >> RM
>> > >> >>> would have
>> > >> >>> > to keep
>> > >> >>> > > > shutting
>> > >> >>> > > > > down and
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> restarting.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Seems like it
>> would be
>> > >> >>> cheaper/simpler to get
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > > free
>> > >> >>> > > > MSDN
>> > >> >>> > > > > account
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> and leave it
running.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> -Alex
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On 4/12/20,
10:15
>> AM,
>> > "Harbs" <
>> > >> >>> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > > > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
harbs.li...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > >> >>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> My
experience is
>> with
>> > AWS.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I assume
>> Microsoft has
>> > similar
>> > >> >>> offerings,
>> > >> >>> > but I
>> > >> >>> > > don’t
>> > >> >>> > > > have
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> experience with
Azure.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> AWS has
>> on-demand EC2
>> > >> instances
>> > >> >>> which you
>> > >> >>> > pay for
>> > >> >>> > > only
>> > >> >>> > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > actual
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> time that they
are
>> > running.[1]
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Instances
can be
>> > started and
>> > >> stopped
>> > >> >>> via
>> > >> >>> > command
>> > >> >>> > > line
>> > >> >>> > > > (or via
>> > >> >>> > > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> web interface) as
>> long as
>> > you have
>> > >> valid
>> > >> >>> > credentials to
>> > >> >>> > > do so.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> For
example: an
>> > m5.4xlarge
>> > >> instance
>> > >> >>> has 16
>> > >> >>> > cores
>> > >> >>> > > and
>> > >> >>> > > > costs
>> > >> >>> > > > > about
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> $1.5 per hour.
On a
>> machine
>> > like
>> > >> that, a
>> > >> >>> full
>> > >> >>> > build
>> > >> >>> > > would
>> > >> >>> > > > probably
>> > >> >>> > > > > take
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> less than 10
minutes.
>> It’s
>> > probably
>> > >> >>> possible to
>> > >> >>> > do a
>> > >> >>> > > full
>> > >> >>> > > > release
>> > >> >>> > > > > with only
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> a few hours of
server
>> time.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Leaving a
server
>> like
>> > that
>> > >> running
>> > >> >>> all the
>> > >> >>> > time
>> > >> >>> > > would get
>> > >> >>> > > > > expensive,
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> but if it’s just
spun
>> up for
>> > >> releases,
>> > >> >>> you’d get
>> > >> >>> > very
>> > >> >>> > > fast
>> > >> >>> > > > builds
>> > >> >>> > > > > at a
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> reasonable price.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I’d be
happy to
>> pay
>> > $10-$50
>> > >> (and
>> > >> >>> possibly
>> > >> >>> > more) per
>> > >> >>> > > > release to
>> > >> >>> > > > > make
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> the release
process
>> painless
>> > for
>> > >> the RM.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> [1]
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> <
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> ><
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> <
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453126991254&sdata=I6nnsWWwkkVZqrXV0Lpgz3civxZk8GfKFr%2BIlBYQ7AE%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >><
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> <
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> ><
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> <
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > <
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca60134b4e7dc40ba25bb08d7e5b88d70%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637230453127001247&sdata=yxGhuT%2F%2BFMzF%2FMWf6g3chkVMaRKaWLZtcOXfUKXJxNo%3D&reserved=0
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> On Apr 12,
2020,
>> at
>> > 7:45 PM,
>> > >> Alex
>> > >> >>> Harui
>> > >> >>> > > > >
<aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> I'm not very
>> > experienced with
>> > >> >>> spinning up
>> > >> >>> > > servers. The
>> > >> >>> > > > CI
>> > >> >>> > > > > server we
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> are using is
>> effectively
>> > free,
>> > >> based on a
>> > >> >>> generous
>> > >> >>> > > donation
>> > >> >>> > > > from
>> > >> >>> > > > > Microsoft
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> of MSDN accounts
to
>> ASF
>> > >> committers. So I
>> > >> >>> leave
>> > >> >>> > it up
>> > >> >>> > > 24/7,
>> > >> >>> > > > and
>> > >> >>> > > > > share the
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> RDP access on
private@.
>> I
>> > think
>> > >> any
>> > >> >>> other ASF
>> > >> >>> > > committer
>> > >> >>> > > > could do
>> > >> >>> > > > > the
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> same. IIRC, if
that
>> server
>> > >> actually is
>> > >> >>> stopped,
>> > >> >>> > I have
>> > >> >>> > > to
>> > >> >>> > > > use my
>> > >> >>> > > > > personal
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> (unshared) MSDN
>> credentials
>> > to
>> > >> start it
>> > >> >>> again.
>> > >> >>> > AIUI,
>> > >> >>> > > if I
>> > >> >>> > > > > actually paid
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> for the server,
it
>> would
>> > cost me
>> > >> to leave
>> > >> >>> it
>> > >> >>> > running
>> > >> >>> > > even if
>> > >> >>> > > > it
>> > >> >>> > > > > didn't run
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> jobs between
releases.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> Is that
what you
>> are
>> > basically
>> > >> >>> saying? I
>> > >> >>> > think it
>> > >> >>> > > might
>> > >> >>> > > > be
>> > >> >>> > > > > best if
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> another
committer got
>> a CI
>> > server
>> > >> going
>> > >> >>> via the MS
>> > >> >>> > > donation
>> > >> >>> > > > and
>> > >> >>> > > > > could leave
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> it up 24/7.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> -Alex
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> On 4/12/20,
9:28
>> AM,
>> > "Harbs" <
>> > >> >>> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
>> > >> >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> I’m willing
to
>> do this.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> Considering
that
>> the
>> > release
>> > >> will be
>> > >> >>> run
>> > >> >>> > > infrequently, it
>> > >> >>> > > > > should be
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> doable to have a
>> relatively
>> > >> powerful
>> > >> >>> server that
>> > >> >>> > could
>> > >> >>> > > be
>> > >> >>> > > > spun up on
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> demand. This is
>> something I
>> > have
>> > >> setup
>> > >> >>> for my own
>> > >> >>> > > releases.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> The only
>> complication
>> > would
>> > >> be that
>> > >> >>> each RM
>> > >> >>> > would
>> > >> >>> > > need
>> > >> >>> > > > valid
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> credentials to
spin
>> up the
>> > server.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>> Harbs
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>> On Apr 12,
>> 2020, at
>> > 7:10 PM,
>> > >> Alex
>> > >> >>> Harui
>> > >> >>> > > > >
<aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> >>>>> A better
>> solution,
>> > IMO, is
>> > >> for
>> > >> >>> someone else
>> > >> >>> > to
>> > >> >>> > > offer up
>> > >> >>> > > > a CI
>> > >> >>> > > > > server
>> > >> >>> > > > > >> only for release
jobs.
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
