Chris, What you are showing me is running and building SDK with distribution - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole SDK or I would like to based my distribution on what I have in maven central - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ and run command:
mvn clean compile -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare distribution. śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > You are running in what directory ? > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > napisał(a): > >> So I'm running: >> >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P >> with-distribution,option-with-swf >> >> And It's working nicely .. same as >> >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P with-distribution >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I have empty >> folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 seconds, which definitely is >> not good: >> >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: >> [INFO] >> [INFO] compc .............................................. SUCCESS [ >> 8.952 s] >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.559 s] >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.567 s] >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.284 s] >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.347 s] >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.683 s] >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. SUCCESS [ >> 1.675 s] >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... SUCCESS [ >> 1.295 s] >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. SUCCESS [ >> 1.305 s] >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ SUCCESS [ >> 14.948 s] >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s >> [INFO] Finished at: 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> >> >> I'm not sure what is happening. >> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> napisał(a): >> >> > Hi Piotr, >> > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was something that >> > changed in Maven ... >> > What you did should work and be all you need. >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch and run a >> > mvn install on them as they need one new artifact from compiler and >> > one new artifact from typedefs. >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate distribution >> > now using Maven ? I did that previously by: >> > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution\ >> > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > napisał(a): >> > >> > > Ok ... >> > > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my "branch" - >> > > Mainly because I don't have a ranch. >> > > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would be cool if >> > > you folks could mass-test it. >> > > >> > > Chris >> > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> > > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, >> > > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef really feels a >> > > bit random. >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today. >> > > >> > > Chris >> > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> > > >> > > No, >> > > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and build all of >> > > them, cause it produces one more artifact in compiler and in the >> typedef. >> > > >> > > Chris >> > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> > > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be a valid >> > > .swc file. So, the person who set that up probably just copied one >> > > of the >> > existing .swc files. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Josh Tynjala >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Josh, >> > > > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ... I just >> > > > didn't want to add stuff we don't need. >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - I'll add them >> > > > ;-) >> > > > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: >> > > > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder appear like >> > > > a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> >> > > > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, so I now just >> > > > added these. >> > > > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort of seems >> > > > pretty strange ... can anyone explain what it's required for? >> > > > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" >> > > > tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" /> >> > > > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a location >> > > > the FlashBuilder might be looking for. >> > > > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors to have a >> > > > "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we could one day simply >> > remove. >> > > > >> > > > Chris >> > > > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> > > > aligned >> > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser and >> > > > > winfonts.ser >> > > > files are needed for? >> > > > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would assume that >> > > > Flash Builder expects those files to exist, but if the Flash >> > > > Builder integration document doesn't mention them, then I don't >> know. >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Josh Tynjala >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Josh, >> > > > > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) >> > > > > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config files used >> > > > > in the Maven distribution should now match the file names in the >> > > distribution. >> > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser and >> > > > > winfonts.ser files are needed for? They are simply completely >> > > > > empty filed the Ant build createates via "touch" commant. I >> > > > > could add them to the Maven distribution, but only want to add >> > > > > stuff >> > that's needed. >> > > > > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the new >> distribution. >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there and in the >> > > > > same location as with the Ant build, but I left away things I >> > > > > tought are probably not required in the distribution and are >> > > > > results of simply packing the entire project up. >> > > > > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it worked with >> > > > > all of them (Haven't tried all of them though) >> > > > > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me some feedback >> > > > > on >> > it. >> > > > > >> > > > > Chris >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> > > > > aligned >> > > > > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE experience >> > > > > while developing a Royale app. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Josh Tynjala >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src directories >> > > > > > of all modules in the "projects" directory to allow the >> code-insights? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the essential parts of >> > > > > > the >> > > "asjs" >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system included. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> > > > > > aligned >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never completely >> > > > > > understood the typedef stuff ;) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the names of the >> > > > > > typedef libraries in all of these 2 (Well actually probably >> > > > > > just >> > > > > > 2) >> > > > > > - external-library-path >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path >> > > > > > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling it a day and >> > > > > > signing off for today. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you folks want >> > > > > > to check what I'm doing ... now you have something to look at >> > > > > > :.) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> > > > > > aligned >> > > > > > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different >> > > > > > external-library-path >> > > > options: >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path and >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both JS and SWF >> > > > > > targets, but you can use js-external-library-path or >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the >> > > > > > external-library-path for a >> > > > specific target. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is defined: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it will >> > > > > > ignore external-library-path >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use external-library-path >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and it >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use external-library-path >> > > > > > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are >> > > > > > defined: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it will >> > > > > > ignore external-library-path >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and it >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and royale-config.xml >> > > > > > configs are all expected to be used for both JS and SWF targets. >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so we're using >> > > > > > js-external-library-path to override which libraries are used >> > > > > > for the JS target. The SWF target will use >> external-library-path. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are expected to >> > > > > > be used with JS only. Basically, these ones can use >> > > > > > external-library-path directly because they don't need to >> > > > > > target SWF. If we wanted, we could change them to use >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should >> > > > > still work. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use js-external-library-path and >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and never use external-library-path. >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy reason (like >> > > > > > Flash Builder support) for why we defaulted to >> > > > > > playerglobal.swc on the external-library-path for the SWF >> > > > > > target instead of using swf-external-library-path. I think >> > > > > > that js-external-library-path or swf-external-library-path >> > > > > > were introduced before I started working on >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are some >> > > > > > > inconsistencies in the config files and I'm currently not >> > > > > > > quite sure to which is the correct >> > > > > > > version: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: >> > > > > > > external-library-path >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version defined as >> > > > > > > properties in all configs except: >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the asdoc-config.xml >> > > > > > > the same way as all the others. >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just thought I'd >> > > > > > > point it >> > > > > out. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> > > > > > > aligned >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build is doing too, >> > > > > > > so I think you are correct. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they sort of >> > > > > > > > were creatd shortly after the big-bang ;-) ... >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from each by: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing the swfversion >> 3. >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf distribution >> > > > > > > > filtering out the references to playerglobal >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only including the >> > > > > > > > output in the distribution and not the templates, as I >> > > > > > > > assume they are not >> > > > > > needed. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> > > > > > > > Maven aligned >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files have existed >> > > > > > > > since the Flex days. The "create-config" task in >> > > > > > > > frameworks/build.xml replaces certain tokens in the >> > > > > > > > template based on the Ant build's current >> > > > > > > configuration. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include all of the Ant >> > > > > > > > build.xml files to allow users to manually rebuild the >> > > > > > > > framework with local changes. If this still holds true, >> > > > > > > > then the config templates are >> > > > > > > probably required. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer Dutz >> > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... they >> > > > > > > > > always were in the frameworks dir ... I think the ANT >> > > > > > > > > build takes the templates and inserts variables to >> > > > > > > > > generate the real >> > > versions. >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same with maven >> ... >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty out of sync. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" files need >> > > > > > > > > to be in the distribution? Are they needed for anything? >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> > > > > > > > > Maven aligned >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log of tupples: >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: Where does >> > > > > > > > > > the xyz-config.xml get generated from the template in >> > > > > > > > > > the ANT >> > > > build? >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the templates as part >> > > > > > > > > > of the >> > > > > > > build)... >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It seems as if >> > > > > > > > > > they are only needed to generate the configs for a >> > > > > > > > > > given set of configured properties. If that's the >> > > > > > > > > > case, we don't need them in the >> > > > > > > distribution. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by you when you >> > > > > > > > > created the maven build for Royale. So if you think you >> > > > > > > > > can remove templates, I think it would be good to reduce >> > > > > > > > > files if they are not >> > > > > > used at all. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml was named >> > > > > > "roayale-config" >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and "flex-config" in the Ant >> > > > > > > > > > distribution and it contained a reference to the >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant version >> > > > > > > > > > contain a lot more implicit imports as well as a >> > > > > > > > > > fxg-base-class element >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing with >> > > > > > > > > fx:Array >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated the >> > > > > > > > > > distribution in the "features/distribution-allignment" >> > branch. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Great! >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and try to get >> > > > > > > > > > the maven distribution to have the same directory >> > > > > > > > > > structure as the Ant one (but excluding all the >> unnecessary stuff). >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and I'll do a >> try. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> > > > > > > > > > Maven aligned >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in "compiler-externc" >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are identical ... >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm a bit rusty >> > > > > > > > > > regarding how all of these externs and stuff work >> > > > > > > > > > together) >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml lists the >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both the non-swf as well as >> > > > > > > > > > the with-swf >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that to the >> > > > > > > > > > configuration >> > > > > > > > changes anything. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> > > > > > > > > > Maven aligned >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.tx >> > > > > > > > > > t >> > > > > > > > > > at master >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master/ide/fla >> > > > > > > > > > sh >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it (we don't >> > > > > > > > > > have the entire >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as expected. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things that could be >> > wrong. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira >> > > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
