Chris, I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I expected to be working. If I remember correctly If I run my command pom from distribution should take care of compiler/royale version - if the freshest stuff doesn't exists locally it should download from Maven central - where is the problem ? What has been changed that this doesn't work like that anymore ?
In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I don't have to build whole framework at all. Thanks, Piotr śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to create a > distribution from what was already released? > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think of the > distribution as some tooling you can apply to something else. > It's more a facet of the current build. > > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a " > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the distribution. > Then you could override the 4 properties: > > <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version> > <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version> > <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version> > <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale. framework.version> > > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2 artifacts for > the older versions. > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one artifact and > the ACE typedef as a second artifact) > > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can start > shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not for earlier > versions. > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36 > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > Chris, > > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with distribution - > that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole SDK or I > would like to based my distribution on what I have in maven central - I > should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ and run command: > > mvn clean compile > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare distribution. > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > You are running in what directory ? > > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > napisał(a): > > > >> So I'm running: > >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf > >> > >> And It's working nicely .. same as > >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >> with-distribution > >> > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > >> > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I have > >> empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 seconds, which > >> definitely is not good: > >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: > >> [INFO] > >> [INFO] compc .............................................. SUCCESS [ > >> 8.952 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.559 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.567 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.284 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.347 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.683 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. SUCCESS [ > >> 1.675 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.295 s] > >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. SUCCESS [ > >> 1.305 s] > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ SUCCESS [ > >> 14.948 s] > >> [INFO] > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > >> [INFO] > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- > >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- > >> > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> > >> > >> I'm not sure what is happening. > >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >> > Hi Piotr, > >> > > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was something that > >> > changed in Maven ... > >> > What you did should work and be all you need. > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch and run > >> > a mvn install on them as they need one new artifact from compiler > >> > and one new artifact from typedefs. > >> > > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > >> > > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by: > >> > > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution\ > >> > > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > napisał(a): > >> > > >> > > Ok ... > >> > > > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my "branch" - > >> > > Mainly because I don't have a ranch. > >> > > > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would be cool > >> > > if you folks could mass-test it. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, > >> > > > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef really feels > >> > > a bit random. > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > No, > >> > > > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and build all > >> > > of them, cause it produces one more artifact in compiler and in > >> > > the > >> typedef. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be a valid > >> > > .swc file. So, the person who set that up probably just copied > >> > > one of the > >> > existing .swc files. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ... I > >> > > > just didn't want to add stuff we don't need. > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - I'll add > >> > > > them > >> > > > ;-) > >> > > > > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: > >> > > > > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder appear > >> > > > like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> > >> > > > > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, so I now > >> > > > just added these. > >> > > > > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort of seems > >> > > > pretty strange ... can anyone explain what it's required for? > >> > > > > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" > >> > > > tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" > >> > > > /> > >> > > > > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a location > >> > > > the FlashBuilder might be looking for. > >> > > > > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors to have > >> > > > a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we could one day > >> > > > simply > >> > remove. > >> > > > > >> > > > Chris > >> > > > > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > aligned > >> > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser and > >> > > > > winfonts.ser > >> > > > files are needed for? > >> > > > > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would assume > >> > > > that Flash Builder expects those files to exist, but if the > >> > > > Flash Builder integration document doesn't mention them, then I > >> > > > don't > >> know. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config files > >> > > > > used in the Maven distribution should now match the file > >> > > > > names in the > >> > > distribution. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser and > >> > > > > winfonts.ser files are needed for? They are simply completely > >> > > > > empty filed the Ant build createates via "touch" commant. I > >> > > > > could add them to the Maven distribution, but only want to > >> > > > > add stuff > >> > that's needed. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the new > >> distribution. > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there and in > >> > > > > the same location as with the Ant build, but I left away > >> > > > > things I tought are probably not required in the distribution > >> > > > > and are results of simply packing the entire project up. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it worked > >> > > > > with all of them (Haven't tried all of them though) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me some > >> > > > > feedback on > >> > it. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > > aligned > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" directory to > >> > > > > > allow the > >> code-insights? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the essential parts > >> > > > > > of the > >> > > "asjs" > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system included. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > > > aligned > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never completely > >> > > > > > understood the typedef stuff ;) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the names of > >> > > > > > the typedef libraries in all of these 2 (Well actually > >> > > > > > probably just > >> > > > > > 2) > >> > > > > > - external-library-path > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling it a day > >> > > > > > and signing off for today. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you folks > >> > > > > > want to check what I'm doing ... now you have something to > >> > > > > > look at > >> > > > > > :.) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > > > aligned > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >> > > > options: > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path and > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both JS and > >> > > > > > SWF targets, but you can use js-external-library-path or > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the > >> > > > > > external-library-path for a > >> > > > specific target. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are > >> > > > > > defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and royale-config.xml > >> > > > > > configs are all expected to be used for both JS and SWF > targets. > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so we're > >> > > > > > using js-external-library-path to override which libraries > >> > > > > > are used for the JS target. The SWF target will use > >> external-library-path. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are expected > >> > > > > > to be used with JS only. Basically, these ones can use > >> > > > > > external-library-path directly because they don't need to > >> > > > > > target SWF. If we wanted, we could change them to use > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should > >> > > > > still work. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use js-external-library-path and > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and never use > external-library-path. > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy reason > >> > > > > > (like Flash Builder support) for why we defaulted to > >> > > > > > playerglobal.swc on the external-library-path for the SWF > >> > > > > > target instead of using swf-external-library-path. I think > >> > > > > > that js-external-library-path or swf-external-library-path > >> > > > > > were introduced before I started working on > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are some > >> > > > > > > inconsistencies in the config files and I'm currently not > >> > > > > > > quite sure to which is the correct > >> > > > > > > version: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > >> > > > > > > external-library-path > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version defined as > >> > > > > > > properties in all configs except: > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others. > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just thought > >> > > > > > > I'd point it > >> > > > > out. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build is doing > >> > > > > > > too, so I think you are correct. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they sort of > >> > > > > > > > were creatd shortly after the big-bang ;-) ... > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from each by: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing the > >> > > > > > > > swfversion > >> 3. > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only including > >> > > > > > > > the output in the distribution and not the templates, > >> > > > > > > > as I assume they are not > >> > > > > > needed. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files have > >> > > > > > > > existed since the Flex days. The "create-config" task > >> > > > > > > > in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain tokens in the > >> > > > > > > > template based on the Ant build's current > >> > > > > > > configuration. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include all of the > >> > > > > > > > Ant build.xml files to allow users to manually rebuild > >> > > > > > > > the framework with local changes. If this still holds > >> > > > > > > > true, then the config templates are > >> > > > > > > probably required. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... they > >> > > > > > > > > always were in the frameworks dir ... I think the ANT > >> > > > > > > > > build takes the templates and inserts variables to > >> > > > > > > > > generate the real > >> > > versions. > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same with > >> > > > > > > > > maven > >> ... > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty out of sync. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" files > >> > > > > > > > > need to be in the distribution? Are they needed for > anything? > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log of tupples: > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: Where > >> > > > > > > > > > does the xyz-config.xml get generated from the > >> > > > > > > > > > template in the ANT > >> > > > build? > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the templates as > >> > > > > > > > > > part of the > >> > > > > > > build)... > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It seems as > >> > > > > > > > > > if they are only needed to generate the configs for > >> > > > > > > > > > a given set of configured properties. If that's the > >> > > > > > > > > > case, we don't need them in the > >> > > > > > > distribution. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by you when > >> > > > > > > > > you created the maven build for Royale. So if you > >> > > > > > > > > think you can remove templates, I think it would be > >> > > > > > > > > good to reduce files if they are not > >> > > > > > used at all. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml was named > >> > > > > > "roayale-config" > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and "flex-config" in the > >> > > > > > > > > > Ant distribution and it contained a reference to > >> > > > > > > > > > the mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant > >> > > > > > > > > > version contain a lot more implicit imports as well > >> > > > > > > > > > as a fxg-base-class element > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing with > >> > > > > > > > > fx:Array > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated the > >> > > > > > > > > > distribution in the "features/distribution-allignment" > >> > branch. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Great! > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and try to > >> > > > > > > > > > get the maven distribution to have the same > >> > > > > > > > > > directory structure as the Ant one (but excluding > >> > > > > > > > > > all the > >> unnecessary stuff). > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and I'll do > >> > > > > > > > > a > >> try. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >> > > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in "compiler-externc" > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are identical ... > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm a bit > >> > > > > > > > > > rusty regarding how all of these externs and stuff > >> > > > > > > > > > work > >> > > > > > > > > > together) > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml lists the > >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both the non-swf as well > >> > > > > > > > > > as the with-swf > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that to the > >> > > > > > > > > > configuration > >> > > > > > > > changes anything. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx > >> > > > > > > > > > t > >> > > > > > > > > > at master > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master/ide/ > >> > > > > > > > > > fla > >> > > > > > > > > > sh > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it (we > >> > > > > > > > > > don't have the entire > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as expected. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things that could > >> > > > > > > > > > be > >> > wrong. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > >> > > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
