> Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff from the Apache Maven repo.
True saying Maven central I meant Apache Maven repo or whatever place this is stored. śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:41 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > SNAPSHOT stuff is never downloaded from Maven central. > > Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff from the > Apache Maven repo. > > BUT ... we only deploy snapshots for stuff on develop. Otherwise, the > versions of feature branches would keep on overwriting the develop > artifacts and we would have a non-deterministic behavior. So ... if we > merged my changes in compiler and typedefs to develop, then the artifacts > would be available in Apache's maven repo, otherwise you have to build them > yourself. > > So, assuming my changes were merged to develop, then you could do it as > you describe. > > Hope that explains things. > > Chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:30 > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > Chris, > > I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I expected to > be working. If I remember correctly If I run my command pom from > distribution should take care of compiler/royale version - if the freshest > stuff doesn't exists locally it should download from Maven central - where > is the problem ? What has been changed that this doesn't work like that > anymore ? > > In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I don't have > to build whole framework at all. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to create a > > distribution from what was already released? > > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think of the > > distribution as some tooling you can apply to something else. > > It's more a facet of the current build. > > > > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a " > > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the > distribution. > > Then you could override the 4 properties: > > > > <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version> > > <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version> > > <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version> > > <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale. > > framework.version> > > > > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2 artifacts > > for the older versions. > > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one artifact > > and the ACE typedef as a second artifact) > > > > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can start > > shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not for earlier > > versions. > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36 > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > > > Chris, > > > > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with distribution > > - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole SDK or > > I would like to based my distribution on what I have in maven central > > - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ and run > command: > > > > mvn clean compile > > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > > > > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare distribution. > > > > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > napisał(a): > > > > > You are running in what directory ? > > > > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > >> So I'm running: > > >> > > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf > > >> > > >> And It's working nicely .. same as > > >> > > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > > >> with-distribution > > >> > > >> > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 > > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > >> > > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I have > > >> empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 seconds, which > > >> definitely is not good: > > >> > > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: > > >> [INFO] > > >> [INFO] compc .............................................. SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 8.952 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.559 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.567 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.284 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.347 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.683 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.675 s] > > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.295 s] > > >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 1.305 s] > > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ SUCCESS > > >> [ > > >> 14.948 s] > > >> [INFO] > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -- > > >> --- > > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > >> [INFO] > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -- > > >> --- > > >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s > > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -- > > >> --- > > >> > > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> > > >> > > >> I'm not sure what is happening. > > >> > > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> napisał(a): > > >> > > >> > Hi Piotr, > > >> > > > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was something that > > >> > changed in Maven ... > > >> > What you did should work and be all you need. > > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch and > > >> > run a mvn install on them as they need one new artifact from > > >> > compiler and one new artifact from typedefs. > > >> > > > >> > Chris > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 > > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > aligned > > >> > > > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate > > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by: > > >> > > > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile > > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution\ > > >> > > > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz > > >> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > > Ok ... > > >> > > > > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my "branch" > > >> > > - Mainly because I don't have a ranch. > > >> > > > > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would be cool > > >> > > if you folks could mass-test it. > > >> > > > > >> > > Chris > > >> > > > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 > > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > > aligned > > >> > > > > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, > > >> > > > > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef really > > >> > > feels a bit random. > > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today. > > >> > > > > >> > > Chris > > >> > > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > >> > > > > >> > > ________________________________ > > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM > > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > > aligned > > >> > > > > >> > > No, > > >> > > > > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and build > > >> > > all of them, cause it produces one more artifact in compiler > > >> > > and in the > > >> typedef. > > >> > > > > >> > > Chris > > >> > > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > >> > > > > >> > > ________________________________ > > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM > > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > > aligned > > >> > > > > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects > > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be a > > >> > > valid .swc file. So, the person who set that up probably just > > >> > > copied one of the > > >> > existing .swc files. > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Josh, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ... I > > >> > > > just didn't want to add stuff we don't need. > > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - I'll add > > >> > > > them > > >> > > > ;-) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder appear > > >> > > > like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, so I now > > >> > > > just added these. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort of > > >> > > > seems pretty strange ... can anyone explain what it's required > for? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" > > >> > > > tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" > > >> > > > /> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a > > >> > > > location the FlashBuilder might be looking for. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors to > > >> > > > have a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we could one > > >> > > > day simply > > >> > remove. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 > > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > > > aligned > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser > > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser > > >> > > > files are needed for? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would assume > > >> > > > that Flash Builder expects those files to exist, but if the > > >> > > > Flash Builder integration document doesn't mention them, then > > >> > > > I don't > > >> know. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Josh, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config files > > >> > > > > used in the Maven distribution should now match the file > > >> > > > > names in the > > >> > > distribution. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser > > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser files are needed for? They are simply > > >> > > > > completely empty filed the Ant build createates via "touch" > > >> > > > > commant. I could add them to the Maven distribution, but > > >> > > > > only want to add stuff > > >> > that's needed. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the new > > >> distribution. > > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there and in > > >> > > > > the same location as with the Ant build, but I left away > > >> > > > > things I tought are probably not required in the > > >> > > > > distribution and are results of simply packing the entire > project up. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it worked > > >> > > > > with all of them (Haven't tried all of them though) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me some > > >> > > > > feedback on > > >> > it. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 > > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > > >> > > > > aligned > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE > > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src > > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" directory to > > >> > > > > > allow the > > >> code-insights? > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the essential parts > > >> > > > > > of the > > >> > > "asjs" > > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system included. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 > > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > > >> > > > > > Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never completely > > >> > > > > > understood the typedef stuff ;) > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the names of > > >> > > > > > the typedef libraries in all of these 2 (Well actually > > >> > > > > > probably just > > >> > > > > > 2) > > >> > > > > > - external-library-path > > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling it a > > >> > > > > > day and signing off for today. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you folks > > >> > > > > > want to check what I'm doing ... now you have something > > >> > > > > > to look at > > >> > > > > > :.) > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 > > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > > >> > > > > > Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different > > >> > > > > > external-library-path > > >> > > > options: > > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path and > > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both JS and > > >> > > > > > SWF targets, but you can use js-external-library-path or > > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the > > >> > > > > > external-library-path for a > > >> > > > specific target. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is defined: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and > > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and > > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are > > >> > > > > > defined: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and > > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and > > >> > > > > > royale-config.xml configs are all expected to be used for > > >> > > > > > both JS and SWF > > targets. > > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so we're > > >> > > > > > using js-external-library-path to override which > > >> > > > > > libraries are used for the JS target. The SWF target will > > >> > > > > > use > > >> external-library-path. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are expected > > >> > > > > > to be used with JS only. Basically, these ones can use > > >> > > > > > external-library-path directly because they don't need to > > >> > > > > > target SWF. If we wanted, we could change them to use > > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should > > >> > > > > still work. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use js-external-library-path > > >> > > > > > and swf-external-library-path, and never use > > external-library-path. > > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy reason > > >> > > > > > (like Flash Builder support) for why we defaulted to > > >> > > > > > playerglobal.swc on the external-library-path for the SWF > > >> > > > > > target instead of using swf-external-library-path. I > > >> > > > > > think that js-external-library-path or > > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path were introduced before I > > >> > > > > > started working on > > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are some > > >> > > > > > > inconsistencies in the config files and I'm currently > > >> > > > > > > not quite sure to which is the correct > > >> > > > > > > version: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > > >> > > > > > > external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version defined as > > >> > > > > > > properties in all configs except: > > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the > > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others. > > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just thought > > >> > > > > > > I'd point it > > >> > > > > out. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 > > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > > >> > > > > > > Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build is doing > > >> > > > > > > too, so I think you are correct. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they sort > > >> > > > > > > > of were creatd shortly after the big-bang ;-) ... > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from each by: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing the > > >> > > > > > > > swfversion > > >> 3. > > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf > > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to > > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only including > > >> > > > > > > > the output in the distribution and not the templates, > > >> > > > > > > > as I assume they are not > > >> > > > > > needed. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 > > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > > >> > > > > > > > Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files have > > >> > > > > > > > existed since the Flex days. The "create-config" task > > >> > > > > > > > in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain tokens in > > >> > > > > > > > the template based on the Ant build's current > > >> > > > > > > configuration. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include all of > > >> > > > > > > > the Ant build.xml files to allow users to manually > > >> > > > > > > > rebuild the framework with local changes. If this > > >> > > > > > > > still holds true, then the config templates are > > >> > > > > > > probably required. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer Dutz > > >> > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... they > > >> > > > > > > > > always were in the frameworks dir ... I think the > > >> > > > > > > > > ANT build takes the templates and inserts variables > > >> > > > > > > > > to generate the real > > >> > > versions. > > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same with > > >> > > > > > > > > maven > > >> ... > > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty out of > sync. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" files > > >> > > > > > > > > need to be in the distribution? Are they needed for > > anything? > > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 > > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > > >> > > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > > >> > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: > > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log of > tupples: > > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: Where > > >> > > > > > > > > > does the xyz-config.xml get generated from the > > >> > > > > > > > > > template in the ANT > > >> > > > build? > > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the templates as > > >> > > > > > > > > > part of the > > >> > > > > > > build)... > > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It seems > > >> > > > > > > > > > as if they are only needed to generate the > > >> > > > > > > > > > configs for a given set of configured properties. > > >> > > > > > > > > > If that's the case, we don't need them in the > > >> > > > > > > distribution. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by you > > >> > > > > > > > > when you created the maven build for Royale. So if > > >> > > > > > > > > you think you can remove templates, I think it > > >> > > > > > > > > would be good to reduce files if they are not > > >> > > > > > used at all. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml was > > >> > > > > > > > > > named > > >> > > > > > "roayale-config" > > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and "flex-config" in > > >> > > > > > > > > > the Ant distribution and it contained a reference > > >> > > > > > > > > > to the mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant > > >> > > > > > > > > > version contain a lot more implicit imports as > > >> > > > > > > > > > well as a fxg-base-class element > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing with > > >> > > > > > > > > fx:Array > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated the > > >> > > > > > > > > > distribution in the > "features/distribution-allignment" > > >> > branch. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Great! > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and try to > > >> > > > > > > > > > get the maven distribution to have the same > > >> > > > > > > > > > directory structure as the Ant one (but excluding > > >> > > > > > > > > > all the > > >> unnecessary stuff). > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and I'll > > >> > > > > > > > > do a > > >> try. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 > > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > > >> > > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in > "compiler-externc" > > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are identical ... > > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm a bit > > >> > > > > > > > > > rusty regarding how all of these externs and > > >> > > > > > > > > > stuff work > > >> > > > > > > > > > together) > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml lists the > > >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both the non-swf as > > >> > > > > > > > > > well as the with-swf > > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that to the > > >> > > > > > > > > > configuration > > >> > > > > > > > changes anything. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 > > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > > >> > > > > > > > > > Maven aligned > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: > > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuild > > >> > > > > > > > > > er > > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx > > >> > > > > > > > > > t > > >> > > > > > > > > > at master > > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master/id > > >> > > > > > > > > > e/ > > >> > > > > > > > > > fla > > >> > > > > > > > > > sh > > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME > > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a > > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml > > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it (we > > >> > > > > > > > > > don't have the entire > > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as expected. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things that > > >> > > > > > > > > > could be > > >> > wrong. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > >> > > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software > > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
