The .jar file downloaded from the CI server doesn't include the playerglobal.swc dependency, so it seems like it isn't using option-with-swf.
For Release Step 11 on the CI server (when royale-asjs is built with Maven) option-with-swf is explicitly included in the Maven options, even though it looks to me like that's supposed to be automatic too. I'd say it doesn't hurt to try. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:29 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > royale-release profile should turn on option-with-swf. > > On 4/7/21, 10:24 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > > I just logged into the CI server. I see that the configuration for > Release > Step 2 includes running Maven with the following options: > > -X > --batch-mode > -Proyale-release,apache-release > release:prepare > -Dtag=org.apache.royale.compiler-$releaseversion-rc$RCNUMBER > -DpushChanges=false > -Dusername=$GITUSERNAME > > Notice that -P does not include option-with-swf. > > I think that you need to update Release Step 2 on the CI server. Since > releasesteps.xml includes option-with-swf, the CI server should too. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:43 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Running ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 > -Drelease.version=0.9.8 > > succeeds on the CI server but fails my local pc because of this > difference > > in DEPENDENCIES. So it’s the same command being run with different > results, > > which means we can’t release. > > > > The only differences I can think of are the mvn version (mine is > 3.6.3, > > CI’s is 3.6.0), and the java version (mine is 1.8.0_281, CI’s is > 1.8.0_201). > > > > I tried removing the playerglobal.swc from CI server’s .m2 repo and > > letting mvn download it but it’s the same result. > > > > From: Josh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:42 PM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] What to do with SWF target now that Adobe > removed > > Flash Player in 2021 (Re: How to build from now on?) > > > > I have tested locally and confirmed that playerglobal.swc is listed > in > > flex-compiler-oem's META-INF/DEPENDENCIES only when using -P > > option-with-swf. That makes sense. So I guess you didn't use -P > > option-with-swf on one of the computers. > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:23 AM Josh Tynjala < > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > wrote: > > > > > Yeah, that could be where it comes from. By why would that affect > one > > > computer, but not another? That doesn't make sense to me. Unless > maybe a > > > slightly different command is being run on the two computers. Are > both > > > using option-with-swf? > > > > > > -- > > > Josh Tynjala > > > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:58 AM Yishay Weiss < > yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Not sure if this is related, but I found this in > > >> royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml > > >> > > >> <profile> > > >> <id>option-with-swf</id> > > >> <dependencies> > > >> <!-- Ensure the playerglobal is available for running > tests --> > > >> <dependency> > > >> <groupId>com.adobe.flash.framework</groupId> > > >> <artifactId>playerglobal</artifactId> > > >> <version>${flash.version}</version> > > >> <type>swc</type> > > >> <scope>runtime</scope> > > >> </dependency> > > >> </dependencies> > > >> </profile> > > >> > > >> From: Josh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 7:26 PM > > >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> Subject: Re: [Discuss] What to do with SWF target now that Adobe > removed > > >> Flash Player in 2021 (Re: How to build from now on?) > > >> > > >> I wouldn't expect a compiler .jar file to have a dependency on > any .swc > > >> files. That doesn't really make any sense to me. Chris might > know, since > > >> he > > >> did the Maven stuff, but he may or may not be around to help > anymore. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Josh Tynjala > > >> Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 4:14 AM Yishay Weiss < > yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > One more thing, perhaps related. I’m getting a different in the > > >> > flex-compiler-oem-0.9.8.jar between my local system and the CI > server > > >> > because of this line > > >> > > > >> > + - playerglobal > com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 > > >> > > > >> > In META-INF/DEPENDENCIES > > >> > > > >> > which only exists in one of the systems. Any ideas on how to get > > around > > >> > that? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > > > >> > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > >> > Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 10:36 AM > > >> > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > Subject: RE: [Discuss] What to do with SWF target now that Adobe > > removed > > >> > Flash Player in 2021 (Re: How to build from now on?) > > >> > > > >> > Hi Josh, > > >> > > > >> > I’m running release ant script which has > > >> > > > >> > <exec executable="${mvn}" dir="${artifactfolder}/sources" > > >> > failonerror="true" > > > >> > <arg value="clean" /> > > >> > <arg value="install" /> > > >> > <arg value="-Proyale-release,option-with-swf" /> > > >> > </exec> > > >> > > > >> > This results in > > >> > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] Installing > > >> > > > >> > > > C:\temp2\sources\compiler-playerglobalc\target\compiler-playerglobalc-0.9.8-tests.jar > > >> > to C:\Users\yisha\.m2\repository\org\apache\royale\compile > > >> > > r\compiler-playerglobalc\0.9.8\compiler-playerglobalc-0.9.8-tests.jar > > >> > [exec] [INFO] > > >> > [exec] [INFO] ----------------< > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler > > >> > >----------------- > > >> > [exec] [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler > 0.9.8 > > >> > [6/13] > > >> > [exec] [INFO] --------------------------------[ jar > > >> > ]--------------------------------- > > >> > [exec] [INFO] Couldn't find artifact: > > >> > com.adobe.flash.framework:20.0:playerglobal:pom > > >> > [exec] [INFO] > > >> > =========================================================== > > >> > [exec] [INFO] - Installing Adobe Flash SDK 20.0 > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings. > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Found binding in > > >> > > > >> > > > [jar:file:/C:/Users/yisha/.m2/repository/org/apache/flex/utilities/converter/flex-sdk-converter-maven-extension/1.0.0/flex-sdk-converter-m > > >> > > aven-extension-1.0.0.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Found binding in > > >> > > > >> > > > [jar:file:/C:/Users/yisha/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-simple/1.7.21/slf4j-simple-1.7.21.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Found binding in > > >> > > > >> > > > [jar:file:/C:/Users/yisha/.m2/repository/ch/qos/logback/logback-classic/1.1.7/logback-classic-1.1.7.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder > > >> > .class] > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Found binding in > > >> > > > >> > > > [jar:file:/C:/dev/apache-maven-3.6.3/bin/../lib/maven-slf4j-provider-3.6.3.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class] > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: See > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slf4j.org%2Fcodes.html%23multiple_bindings&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vIwcDmqTaV4hUORAldv5FLh6%2FTtBrmjbLvMXc5T0cHs%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > for an explanation. > > >> > [exec] SLF4J: Actual binding is of type > > >> > [org.slf4j.impl.SimpleLoggerFactory] > > >> > [exec] Your System-Id: ca4f30bf > > >> > [exec] The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the > Adobe Flash > > >> > Player playerglobal.swc. Do you want to install the Adobe Flash > Player > > >> > playerglobal.swc? > > >> > [exec] (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server > build, > > >> > alternatively to typing y or yes you can also set a system > property > > >> > containing your system which is interpr > > >> > eted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: > > >> > > > >> > > > -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=ca4f30bf > > >> > ) > > >> > > > >> > Adding > > >> > > > >> > <arg > > >> > > > >> > > > value="-Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=ca4f30bf" > > >> > /> > > >> > > > >> > Did make the prompt go away, but I’m not sure if I can commit > ca4f30bf > > >> or > > >> > if that’s specific to my system. > > >> > > > >> > Can you advise? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > > > >> > From: Josh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:39 AM > > >> > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > >> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] What to do with SWF target now that Adobe > > removed > > >> > Flash Player in 2021 (Re: How to build from now on?) > > >> > > > >> > Here's a follow-up with my progress in March. > > >> > > > >> > Last month, I had gotten airglobal.swc building, and now, I've > figured > > >> out > > >> > how to exclude the AIR-only APIs and build a separate > playerglobal.swc > > >> too. > > >> > I've committed playerglobal and airglobal projects to > royale-typedefs. > > >> > Again, these .swc files get built from the Apache-licensed doc > XML > > files > > >> > that Adobe donated to Apache Flex. > > >> > > > >> > I've made some changes to the builds for royale-asjs to start > using > > >> these > > >> > new .swc files. Libraries build. Examples build. Tests pass. > These > > .swc > > >> > files are working nicely. Things can still be improved, but > it's a > > solid > > >> > start. > > >> > > > >> > Maven is using our airglobal/playerglobal for pretty much > everything. > > >> You > > >> > can run `mvn clean install` at the root of royale-asjs, and it > will > > >> build > > >> > all framework .swc files without requiring any Adobe artifacts. > You > > can > > >> > also run with `-P with-distribution,option-with-swf` to build a > > >> zip/tar.gz > > >> > distribution without requiring any Adobe artifacts. > > >> > > > >> > The only time that the Maven build still requires Adobe > artifacts is > > if > > >> you > > >> > specify `-P with-distribution,option-with-swf` and > > >> > `-DdistributionTargetFolder=` together. The > > `-DdistributionTargetFolder` > > >> > option merges in everything from the AIR SDK (not only > airglobal.swc, > > >> but > > >> > also executables like adt and adl), and I assume that we still > want > > >> that to > > >> > be possible, but optional. If you need a SWF distribution > without > > Adobe > > >> > stuff, just build the zip/tar.gz version and extract it. > > >> > > > >> > I basically consider the Maven changes to be done at this point. > > >> > > > >> > Ant is using our airglobal/playerglobal in some places, but not > > >> everywhere > > >> > yet. You can run `ant` in the root of royale-asjs, and it will > build > > all > > >> > framework .swc files without requiring Adobe artifacts. If you > have > > >> > env.AIR_HOME or env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME specified, it will still > use > > Adobe > > >> > artifacts, and I plan to keep that working for anyone who > happens to > > >> prefer > > >> > that. If you don't have those environment variables set, it > will use > > our > > >> > airglobal/playerglobal automatically. > > >> > > > >> > Building a SWF distribution with Ant still requires > env.AIR_HOME and > > >> > env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME at this time. I just didn't have quite > enough > > time > > >> > this month to finish that part. Next month, I hope to be able to > > modify > > >> the > > >> > Ant build to do a full release without Adobe artifacts (except > you'll > > >> still > > >> > need Flash Player to run tests, of course). > > >> > > > >> > I know that there's been talk of doing a release soon. While my > work > > is > > >> > still in progress, it's currently in a state that should not > prevent a > > >> > release, if someone wants to do one. As I said, you can still > specify > > >> > env.AIR_HOME and env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, and the Ant release > > distribution > > >> > build with Adobe artifacts should work the same as before. > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Josh Tynjala > > >> > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:55 PM Josh Tynjala < > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev > > >> > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Just an update on my progress in February to create an > > Apache-licensed > > >> > > playerglobal.swc. Last month, I had successfully built the > SWC file > > >> using > > >> > > the Apache-licensed asdoc XML files that are in the Flex SDK, > but I > > >> > hadn't > > >> > > had a chance to see if I could drop it in to replace the > official > > >> Adobe > > >> > SWC > > >> > > yet. When I finally got a chance to try it this month, my SWC > didn't > > >> work > > >> > > at first. However, I was able to make some tweaks to the APIs > where > > I > > >> > > discovered that types/parameters were slightly wrong in the > docs. I > > >> can > > >> > now > > >> > > successfully use the SWC to build the entire Royale framework > > >> (including > > >> > > running RoyaleUnit tests), and I can run the compiler's > > >> > > "royale.dependent.tests" integration tests too. > > >> > > > > >> > > I also cleaned up the command line API for playerglobalc to > make it > > >> work > > >> > > more like other compiler tools, like mxmlc, compc, or > externc. After > > >> > > getting that working, I updated the royale-maven-plugin to > make it > > >> > possible > > >> > > to build the same SWC using either Maven or the command line. > > >> > > > > >> > > What I still need to do: > > >> > > > > >> > > - Build separately playerglobal.swc and airglobal.swc. > AIR-only APIs > > >> > > should not appear in playerglobal.swc. > > >> > > - Test the SWC with some non-Royale projects too. Since > building the > > >> > > Royale framework helped me find some APIs that were slightly > wrong > > in > > >> the > > >> > > docs, I figure that I should test the SWC with some other > projects > > >> too. I > > >> > > plan to drop the SWC into the Flex SDK, and test some apps > using > > Flex, > > >> > > Starling, and Feathers. That should cover a wide range of > APIs. If > > >> they > > >> > all > > >> > > compile and run, then I think our Apache-licensed replacement > will > > be > > >> > > looking pretty solid. > > >> > > - Finally, I need to figure out how to integrate our new > > >> > > playerglobal.swc/airglobal.swc into the distribution builds. > I'd > > like > > >> to > > >> > > allow anyone building the framework to continue to use SWCs > from > > >> Adobe or > > >> > > Harman, if they'd prefer. > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Josh Tynjala > > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:16 PM Josh Tynjala < > > >> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> FYI — I just pushed a prototype playerglobal-source-gen > project to > > >> the > > >> > >> royale-compiler repo. It's a command line app that can > generate .as > > >> > files > > >> > >> from the Flex SDK's Apache-licensed asdoc files for > > playerglobal.swc. > > >> > The > > >> > >> idea is to use these generated .as files to compile our own > > >> > >> playerglobal.swc that we can distribute under the Apache > license. > > If > > >> > Adobe > > >> > >> ever decides to remove playerglobal.swc from their website, > we'll > > >> have > > >> > our > > >> > >> version available as a backup. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> I've gotten the project far enough along that I can > successfully > > >> build > > >> > >> the generated .as source files into a .swc without any > compiler > > >> errors. > > >> > >> However, I haven't yet had a chance to check if that .swc > can be > > used > > >> > in an > > >> > >> SDK/distribution instead of the official playerglobal.swc or > > >> > airglobal.swc. > > >> > >> In February, when I have some more time, I'll continue > testing all > > of > > >> > that. > > >> > >> I just wanted to share my current progress so far! > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> Josh Tynjala > > >> > >> Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:34 AM Carlos Rovira < > > >> carlosrov...@apache.org> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> Hi Josh, > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> I think that's a very good idea. As less external > dependencies we > > >> have > > >> > >>> the > > >> > >>> better. And I think that means one thing less to download or > > manage > > >> by > > >> > >>> mavenizer. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Could it be possible that you contribute it? > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Thanks > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> El lun, 4 ene 2021 a las 21:53, Josh Tynjala (< > > >> > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev > > >> > >>> >) > > >> > >>> escribió: > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > If necessary, I believe that we can create our own custom > > >> > >>> playerglobal.swc > > >> > >>> > without running into license issues. > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > Basically, the official playerglobal.swc contains only > the APIs, > > >> and > > >> > no > > >> > >>> > implementation, so it's basically like the > typedef/externs SWCs > > >> that > > >> > we > > >> > >>> > create for JS libraries in Royale > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > The Apache Flex repo contains full ASDoc XML files for > > >> > playerglobal.swc > > >> > >>> > under an Apache license. These files should contain enough > > >> > information > > >> > >>> > about variable/property types and method signatures that > someone > > >> > could > > >> > >>> > write a parser to get all of the data we need to generate > AS3 > > stub > > >> > >>> classes > > >> > >>> > and build a SWC from that. > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > -- > > >> > >>> > Josh Tynjala > > >> > >>> > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=B0wjSNGoZZKTB8k%2BJBAxHaPHsRXNpMWTooLEIutGnm4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 11:07 AM Harbs < > harbs.li...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Let’s wait and see whether we are dealing with real > issues or > > >> not. > > >> > If > > >> > >>> > it’s > > >> > >>> > > an issue we can debate solutions. > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > I’m happy to ask my Adobe contacts what the plan is. > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > On Jan 3, 2021, at 8:52 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > >> > carlosrov...@apache.org > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > wrote: > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Hi Harbs, > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > the problem here's that I think we are on Apache, and > using > > a > > >> > >>> piece of > > >> > >>> > > > software that is under a clear license use will be > against > > the > > >> > >>> > foundation > > >> > >>> > > > rules. So although you or I can host the files, > that's not > > >> seem > > >> > to > > >> > >>> me > > >> > >>> > > like > > >> > >>> > > > a solution to the real problem. > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > I'm for go step by step and first try to talk with > Adobe > > >> > >>> > representatives > > >> > >>> > > to > > >> > >>> > > > get the permission for Apache to host the player > files only > > >> for > > >> > our > > >> > >>> > flex > > >> > >>> > > > and royale use cases. I think we could continue > discussion > > >> after > > >> > we > > >> > >>> > know > > >> > >>> > > > the solution to this request > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Can you, Alex or others do this request? or if you > want I > > can > > >> do > > >> > >>> it, > > >> > >>> > but > > >> > >>> > > > need someone to provide me the contact at adobe. > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > Thanks > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > El dom, 3 ene 2021 a las 15:59, Harbs (< > > harbs.li...@gmail.com > > >> >) > > >> > >>> > > escribió: > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > >> There’s no license agreement when downloading > playerglobal > > or > > >> > the > > >> > >>> > > content > > >> > >>> > > >> debugger. > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> I’m willing to take the risk to personally host > these files > > >> if > > >> > >>> > > necessary. > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >>> On Jan 3, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Christofer Dutz < > > >> > >>> > christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >>> And I doubt we would be allowed to simply upload > Adobe > > >> stuff to > > >> > >>> any > > >> > >>> > > >> other server wirhout explicit conset from them. The > license > > >> > >>> agreement > > >> > >>> > > you > > >> > >>> > > >> agreed to when downloading explicitly forbids that > (at > > least > > >> it > > >> > >>> did, > > >> > >>> > > wenn > > >> > >>> > > >> we were working on the Flex Mavenizer and I doubt > things > > >> > changed) > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > -- > > >> > >>> > > > Carlos Rovira > > >> > >>> > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC > > >> > >>> > > > *Apache Software Foundation* > > >> > >>> > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DY6wMFPjRNHcNLxKnS5uqbqABnfjhk8daxOVWjSh12g%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> -- > > >> > >>> Carlos Rovira > > >> > >>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC > > >> > >>> *Apache Software Foundation* > > >> > >>> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4650810c8834be7649108d8f9ea0e57%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637534130955865526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DY6wMFPjRNHcNLxKnS5uqbqABnfjhk8daxOVWjSh12g%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
