----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/#review157501 -----------------------------------------------------------
sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java (line 167) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/#comment228107> Does "serializable" in Oracle mean the same thing as "repeatable" in other databases? - Hao Hao On Nov. 29, 2016, 6:29 a.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 29, 2016, 6:29 a.m.) > > > Review request for sentry, Colm O hEigeartaigh, Colin Ma, Hao Hao, Sravya > Tirukkovalur, and Vadim Spector. > > > Repository: sentry > > > Description > ------- > > SENTRY-1534: Oracle supports serializable instead of repeatable-read > > > Diffs > ----- > > > sentry-service/sentry-service-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/ServiceConstants.java > 919fdaf11c36b412211176ede3c98170a2e34235 > > sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java > 742798dca6b3ad8c9b9eee1eea5380001d1d0cd9 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Kolbasov > >
