> On Nov. 30, 2016, 11:55 p.m., Hao Hao wrote: > > sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java, > > line 167 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/diff/2/?file=1571678#file1571678line167> > > > > Does "serializable" in Oracle mean the same thing as "repeatable" in > > other databases?
It isn't exactly the same. Oracle provides just two isolation levels - read-committed and serializable. Serializable is stronger than repeatable-read and will also protect us from updating the same row from two transactions at the same time. - Alexander ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/#review157501 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 5, 2017, 9:04 a.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 5, 2017, 9:04 a.m.) > > > Review request for sentry, Colin Ma, Hao Hao, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, Vamsee > Yarlagadda, and Vadim Spector. > > > Bugs: SENTRY-1534 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1534 > > > Repository: sentry > > > Description > ------- > > SENTRY-1534: Oracle supports serializable instead of repeatable-read > > > Diffs > ----- > > > sentry-service/sentry-service-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/ServiceConstants.java > 919fdaf11c36b412211176ede3c98170a2e34235 > > sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java > f83d72160e1c44442d3d1ec1b870ea4b4d5dda1a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53920/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Kolbasov > >
