> On April 19, 2017, 6:18 p.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/HMSFollower.java
> > Line 259 (original), 257 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58481/diff/3-4/?file=1693586#file1693586line259>
> >
> >     This still preserves the original problem when events are not processed 
> > for some reason - you will get a flood of logs. In this case events would 
> > be always non-empty.
> 
> Na Li wrote:
>     In this case, something is defintely wrong. I think we should log such 
> situation. Otherwise, how do we detect that there are new changes, but we 
> could not process them?
> 
> Na Li wrote:
>     I thought the original issue is that when there is no new update, we 
> still log the same message again and again. If there are updates, processing 
> them will advance currentEventID; not processing them should be error 
> condition

the behavior is updated. track last logged ID. log debug message if it changes 
with update. log error message once if it does not change with update.


- Na


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58481/#review172380
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 20, 2017, 6:14 p.m., Na Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58481/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 20, 2017, 6:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1674
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1674
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Do not log message when CurrentEventID does not change and there is no 
> updates for HMSFollower
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/HMSFollower.java
>  16676fb 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58481/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Na Li
> 
>

Reply via email to