Done, it is opened, https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions

Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108

Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2021年8月18日周三 上午10:40写道:
>
> Ticket created, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22217
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
> Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2021年8月18日周三 上午10:35写道:
> >
> > 4 days pass.
> >
> > We have 3 PMC members supporting.
> > Let's ask the INFRA to open this on the main repo? And also, we need
> > to add the link on the website menu.
> >
> > Sheng Wu 吴晟
> > Twitter, wusheng1108
> >
> > Daming <[email protected]> 于2021年8月16日周一 下午3:32写道:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > An issue is to discuss specific issues, and DISCUSSION will take about a 
> > > topic.
> > > A few days ago, the same discussion[1] happened at APISIX community. The 
> > > vote passed and the thread was here[2].
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03325.html
> > > 2. 
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r792a361c62b54058f6d378213a5bbc1cabdc7df188e5be8ff9270eaf%40%3Cdev.apisix.apache.org%3E
> > >  
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r792a361c62b54058f6d378213a5bbc1cabdc7df188e5be8ff9270eaf@%3Cdev.apisix.apache.org%3E>
> > >
> > > ——
> > > Haochao Zhuang
> > >
> > > > 2021年8月14日 下午2:33,Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > But you forget what is the side effect we people read answers. If they
> > > > asked in Chinese, we answer in English. The whole context is pointless.
> > > > Even the unperfect English statement is better than nothing. If we don't
> > > > push, who will?
> > > > We insisted in back to when SkyWalking is much younger, and less users. 
> > > > Why
> > > > we change this? Evem we have known this would not have good effect in 
> > > > long
> > > > term.
> > > >
> > > > SkyWalking has been a good example, and other community sees the 
> > > > solution
> > > > out, and learn from us, including TiDB, and other TLPs initialzied in
> > > > China.
> > > > Now, we give up? Please don't.
> > > >
> > > > The base line is, this is never a foundation requirement. See Dubbo, it
> > > > could nearly work only in Chinese, except official announcement. If we 
> > > > give
> > > > up global community, we could.
> > > >
> > > > But I would never support this direction. We cost too much to be here.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > kezhenxu94 <[email protected]>于2021年8月14日 周六上午10:28写道:
> > > >
> > > >> I’m big +1 to enable it, the reason why I haven’t proposed it until 
> > > >> now is
> > > >> that I doubt that whether users will use it to ask question, if users 
> > > >> still
> > > >> ask questions in GitHub issues, should we transfer it to Discussions
> > > >> (GitHub provides a one-click transfer from issue to discussion though)?
> > > >> That would be a workload too. Anyway it is better we enable it now than
> > > >> later and users may adopt it quicker.
> > > >>
> > > >> Sheng wrote:
> > > >>> Futher, if we allow this officially, this wouldn't lower the load,
> > > >> instead,
> > > >> we double the load for ourselves
> > > >>
> > > >> In my opinion, the only reason not to allow non-English is from ASF
> > > >> perspective, if it’s from maintainers’, I think force Chinese users to 
> > > >> use
> > > >> English will double our load as many of them use poorly-composed 
> > > >> English
> > > >> words / sentences / Chinglish and that needs maintainers to translate 
> > > >> it
> > > >> back to Chinese, what’s worse, they didn’t make them clear until the
> > > >> conversation goes back and forth for several rounds.
> > > >>
> > > >> ————————————
> > > >> 柯振旭 (@kezhenxu94)
> > > >> Apache SkyWalking PMC
> > > >> Apache Incubator PMC and Mentor
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Aug 14, 2021, at 08:51, Chen Yihao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello all, this is a proposal on enabling the `GitHub Discussions`
> > > >> Feature for the SkyWalking main repository.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> First, a bit of background, this feature adds a new `Discussions` tab 
> > > >>> to
> > > >> the repository next to Pull requests. The aim is to facilitate the
> > > >> socio-technical growth of the SkyWalking Ecosystem.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "GitHub Discussions is a collaborative communication forum for the
> > > >> community around an open-source project. Discussions are for 
> > > >> conversations
> > > >> that need to be transparent and accessible but do not need to be 
> > > >> tracked on
> > > >> a project board and are not related to code, unlike GitHub Issues.
> > > >> Discussions enable fluid, open conversation in a public forum." -- 
> > > >> GitHub(
> > > >> https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/quickstart)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now, with a fast-growing user base, it is observed that duplicated
> > > >> questions are flooding our QQ chat groups, Slack and even the Issues
> > > >> section. The original intent of issues was tracking code-related 
> > > >> matters,
> > > >> defects and tasks. It is frustrating for the maintainers having to 
> > > >> monitor
> > > >> and handle unrelated/ duplicated questions in the decentralized 
> > > >> channels
> > > >> mentioned above, while on the other hand, newcomers face trouble 
> > > >> digging
> > > >> helpful info -> asking more duplicated questions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thus, I propose turning on this feature as a new channel for threads
> > > >> that are not closely coupled with code. Stakeholders could freely 
> > > >> discuss
> > > >> their use cases, present new ideas and seek help from the community. 
> > > >> Our
> > > >> `Discussions` tab could serve a purpose as a hybrid of Stack Overflow 
> > > >> and a
> > > >> Forum. I believe doing so will further boost the community health, 
> > > >> spark
> > > >> some great ideas, and most importantly, attract more contributors to
> > > >> SkyWalking.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We may also want to consider the language scope allowed in this new
> > > >> section. `Discussions` being a less formal ground, more language 
> > > >> diversity
> > > >> could help more users(SEO-wise) and contributors who are unfamiliar 
> > > >> with
> > > >> English. Therefore, I propose opening up language-specific 
> > > >> `categories`, if
> > > >> a mixed-language form isn't desirable. (
> > > >> https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/managing-discussions-for-your-community/managing-categories-for-discussions-in-your-repository
> > > >> )
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The above summarizes my proposal; I appreciate your thoughts, and 
> > > >>> please
> > > >> vote on the matter.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Many thanks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Yihao Chen 陈意昊
> > > >>> GitHub @ Superskyyy
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟
> > > >
> > > > Apache SkyWalking
> > > > Apache Incubator
> > > > Apache ShardingSphere, ECharts, DolphinScheduler podlings
> > > > Zipkin
> > > > Twitter, wusheng1108
> > >

Reply via email to