Hello,

the actual version of JCL[1] is 1.1. One major issue was binary 
compatibility.
If slf4j does trust this, it could switch from 1.0.4 to 1.1. Another 
possibility is
to establish a new additonal pom for 1.1.

What do you think?
If you are accepting a JCL 1.1 version I could contribute this - but 
just if it is reviewed
and "going to trunk" in a defined timeframe. How would such a timeframe be?

Regards
Boris

[1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to