Hello Boris, Sorry for not replying earlier. Aren't JCL 1.0.4 and 1.1 compatible? The 1.1 release notes state that the Log and LogFactory classes have not been changed. Thus, I don't see the need for a parallel 1.1 branch. The current 1.0.4 branch should cover 1.1 as well. Would you agree?
Btw, thanks for the kind offer for help. Cheers, At 05:44 PM 8/18/2006, Boris Unckel wrote: >Hello, > >the actual version of JCL[1] is 1.1. One major issue was binary >compatibility. >If slf4j does trust this, it could switch from 1.0.4 to 1.1. Another >possibility is >to establish a new additonal pom for 1.1. > >What do you think? >If you are accepting a JCL 1.1 version I could contribute this - but >just if it is reviewed >and "going to trunk" in a defined timeframe. How would such a timeframe be? > >Regards >Boris > >[1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/ -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
