Hi Boris, At 09:36 PM 8/29/2006, Boris Unckel wrote:
>I think they(the JCL team) have achieved binary compatibility. The >question is about the dependency: Should >slf4j rely on 1.04 (because this was the latest stable release when >slf4j was initially developed) or >should slf4j rely always on the latest available (compatible) version? Given that from SLF4J's point of view, JCL 1.04. and 1.1 are indistinguishable (= compatible), I feel that there is no need to create a new branch. >As soon as an incompatible version comes up, two branches are necessary. Agreed. >Regards >Boris -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
