Hi, On 21/09/16 08:13, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Finally, recently some people suggested that we support all of Oaks >filtering possibilities for the ResourceChangeListener. I'm not a fan of >that - first of all, we should only support what is really needed. >Second, as soon as we support it, it means that every resource provider >needs to support it which might but a high burden for nothing on the >implementations. And finally, as we already see with the globbing, >filtering is nice but we have to be careful for remove events and >clearly specifiy how this works - and specify it in a way that it really >works for the listeners. What about support for the famous ExcludeExternal? Cheers, Stefan
