> On 21/09/16 14:14, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 14:11 +0200, Stefan Egli wrote: >>> On 21/09/16 11:26, "Robert Munteanu" <romb...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:18 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So we a) need to clarify the contract and b) think about what we >>>>> do >>>>> if >>>>> someone registers for a glob pattern. Do we send removal of >>>>> parents >>>>> automatically or do we expect to listener to register at /? >>>> >>>> I would say that we send removal of parents automatically, it's >>>> simpler >>>> for the clients. >>> >>> Ok, I start to see the advantage of getting automatically notified on >>> parent removal.. am thinking though if such a choice should not be up >>> to >>> the listener (perhaps yes, with default 'true')? >> >> In what scenarios would it be useful to have this choice? > > Good question, I'll try to come up with one :) Not in the cache scenario, > agreed. How's the exact definition here though: say you register for > removal of **.jsp - are you getting notified *only* for parents that > actually contain any *.jsp I assume? Otherwise I'm expecting noise.. > How does the sender now?
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
