On 21/09/16 11:12, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi, >> >> On 21/09/16 08:13, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Finally, recently some people suggested that we support all of Oaks >>> filtering possibilities for the ResourceChangeListener. I'm not a fan >>>of >>> that - first of all, we should only support what is really needed. >>> Second, as soon as we support it, it means that every resource provider >>> needs to support it which might but a high burden for nothing on the >>> implementations. And finally, as we already see with the globbing, >>> filtering is nice but we have to be careful for remove events and >>> clearly specifiy how this works - and specify it in a way that it >>>really >>> works for the listeners. >> >> What about support for the famous ExcludeExternal? >> > >That's already there - a listener by default just listens for local >events. If it implements ExternalRCL as well (marker interface), it gets >the external events as well Ah, good to know! Cheers, Stefan
