>> 4. think about making a variant of the TestUtil.getDeep() method >available in the API as well - it was already duplicated in fsresource > >Please see my feedback on http://www.mail- >archive.com/dev@sling.apache.org/msg65486.html. I don't think using >Map<String, Object> is the proper return type here.
you're right, i've missed that comment. nested maps are dead simple, but perhaps not enough here. first i thought same node name and property name is a variant of same-name-sibling (which is only partial supported even by oak), but this does not seem to be the case. so i do not think we have to support same name siblings, but same node name and property name. i will propose a new approach. stefan
