Hi Tommaso, On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 18:17 +0000, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > in Apache OpenNLP we were on wip and then switched to gitbox > afterwards > because we found that easier when merging pull requests (less > forks/origins > to maintain) and wanted to enforce a stricter review process for > commits so > that now every contribution goes through a PR which needs +1s, on the > other > hand in Apache Lucene / Solr we have git-wip because we use it not > much > differently from how we used SVN in terms of development workflows. > So I would say it depends on what we look for.
Do you recall any issues with using both github and the asf git repo as masters? Or did you just settle with pushing to github and ignored the asf repos? I would like to avoid any potential issues with getting the two masters out of sync. Thanks, Robert > For now I would opt for git-wip, but I see Justin's point and if more > people want to go that way I can see the benefits. > > My 2 cents, > Tommaso > > Il giorno mer 20 set 2017 alle ore 18:06 Justin Edelson < > jus...@justinedelson.com> ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > While it is true that this project does not have an existing > > Github-centric > > workflow, I suspect that most of us use such a workflow on other > > projects, > > so I would be more in favor of the dual-master system. > > > > Regards, > > Justin > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:48 AM Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.or > > g> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > According to http://git.apache.org/ , there are two systems in > > > use at > > > the ASF: > > > > > > - the "Git Wip" system > > > - the "Github Dual Master" > > > > > > I have not found any more information about these - Ian > > > referenced the > > > dual master some time ago [1], but AFAICT the "Wip" system is > > > basically > > > ASF hosted git mirrored to Github, while the "Dual Master" system > > > allows us to push to Github as well as to the ASF Git. > > > > > > IMO the dual master system is for projects with a Github-centric > > > workflow coming to the ASF, which is not our situation at all, so > > > I'd > > > go with the "Wip" system. > > > > > > What do others think? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b0003cf9fcb1c365a9ed3 > > > 54fe7c > > > 20c2c4c5b465c952829e0eb4c78@1458668880@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E > > >
