I was merely listing PRs I was working on or closely related to; not an
exclusive list to those others are working on :-)

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alessandro,
> I'd strongly appreciate if this can be included in 9.0. It is a very
> thorough work and clearly the best highlight of 9.0, if you're able to
> include it.Thanks for your work.
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan, 2022, 10:59 pm Alessandro Benedetti, <
> abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> What about the Neural Search contribution I am working on:
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/476 ?
>> It's pretty much done and low risk (just waiting for some additional
>> review, but I hope I fixed most of the concerns found so far).
>> To me, it could easily be on 9.1 but the fact that is completed could
>> spark some discussions about including it in 9.0 or not :)
>>
>> Cheers
>> --------------------------
>> Alessandro Benedetti
>> Apache Lucene/Solr PMC member and Committer
>> Director, R&D Software Engineer, Search Consultant
>>
>> www.sease.io
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 04:47, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The following changes are on my mind for 9.0, and some others.  I will
>>> do many; others I'm a reviewer for a contributor. I think these are best
>>> done on a major release, but this isn't to say each is "important".  Jan
>>> (as RM), please let me know what you think.  I suppose I need your approval?
>>>
>>> Observability:
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14686 Remove log
>>> "[coreName]" (logid) which is redundant with MDC
>>> -- PR just updated and tagged some possible reviewers.  No feedback yet
>>> :-/  I'll merge soon.
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15905 "Don't automatically
>>> register Solr's metrics with JMX (SolrJmxReporter)"
>>> -- Yet our default solr.xml could keep it?.  ETA Jan 24
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14401 ""distrib" request
>>> handler metrics should only be tracked on pertinent handlers"
>>> -- Looking for some feedback on the issue first.  ETA Jan 24
>>>
>>> Highlighting:
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15259 lower default
>>> hl.fragAlignRatio
>>> -- minor change but better to change highlighting fragment defaults in a
>>> major release but not critical.  ETA: Jan 17
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12901 Make
>>> UnifiedHighlighter the default
>>> -- There are some overlaps between the highlighters but I definitely
>>> think the UH is the best highlighter.  ETA Jan 21
>>> -- separate issue, TBD: removing the big/verbose configs for the other
>>> highlighters from the default solrconfig.xml to keep it leaner.
>>>
>>> Docker:
>>> * JIRA TBD, Java 17 runtime.  ETA Jan 17
>>>
>>> Filter.java; remove/hide
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12336 "Remove Filter from
>>> Solr"
>>> -- a contributor has something but is getting approval.  If we don't get
>>> this in time, I could do something simple to just ensure the class isn't
>>> public.
>>>
>>> Nested Docs:
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064 "Atomic/partial
>>> updates to nested docs should not assume _route_ param is the root ID"
>>> -- Debt/confusion to be removed. ETA 21 Jan
>>>
>>> Modularizing:
>>> * Solrj-Zookeeper: ETA Jan 17
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14660  HDFS (or Hadoop?)
>>> -- Waiting for the contributor to return to it.  See the issue for
>>> discussion on what to do if it stagnates further.
>>>
>>> ~ David Smiley
>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>
>>

Reply via email to