Just go ahead with neural in main and branch_9x, and put it on the agenda for 
the committers meeting. Will you attend?

Jan Høydahl

> 14. jan. 2022 kl. 18:56 skrev Alessandro Benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io>:
> 
> 
> Sorry David, I didn't mean to abruptly raid the topic, I misread it was just 
> the lists of your own proposals :)
> --------------------------
> Alessandro Benedetti
> Apache Lucene/Solr PMC member and Committer
> Director, R&D Software Engineer, Search Consultant
> 
> www.sease.io
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 17:52, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I was merely listing PRs I was working on or closely related to; not an 
>> exclusive list to those others are working on :-)
>> 
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>> 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Alessandro,
>>> I'd strongly appreciate if this can be included in 9.0. It is a very 
>>> thorough work and clearly the best highlight of 9.0, if you're able to 
>>> include it.Thanks for your work.
>>> Regards,
>>> Ishan
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 14 Jan, 2022, 10:59 pm Alessandro Benedetti, 
>>>> <abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> What about the Neural Search contribution I am working on: 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/476 ?
>>>> It's pretty much done and low risk (just waiting for some additional 
>>>> review, but I hope I fixed most of the concerns found so far).
>>>> To me, it could easily be on 9.1 but the fact that is completed could 
>>>> spark some discussions about including it in 9.0 or not :)
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --------------------------
>>>> Alessandro Benedetti
>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr PMC member and Committer
>>>> Director, R&D Software Engineer, Search Consultant
>>>> 
>>>> www.sease.io
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 04:47, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> The following changes are on my mind for 9.0, and some others.  I will do 
>>>>> many; others I'm a reviewer for a contributor. I think these are best 
>>>>> done on a major release, but this isn't to say each is "important".  Jan 
>>>>> (as RM), please let me know what you think.  I suppose I need your 
>>>>> approval?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Observability:
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14686 Remove log 
>>>>> "[coreName]" (logid) which is redundant with MDC
>>>>> -- PR just updated and tagged some possible reviewers.  No feedback yet 
>>>>> :-/  I'll merge soon.
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15905 "Don't automatically 
>>>>> register Solr's metrics with JMX (SolrJmxReporter)"
>>>>> -- Yet our default solr.xml could keep it?.  ETA Jan 24
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14401 ""distrib" request 
>>>>> handler metrics should only be tracked on pertinent handlers"
>>>>> -- Looking for some feedback on the issue first.  ETA Jan 24
>>>>> 
>>>>> Highlighting:
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15259 lower default 
>>>>> hl.fragAlignRatio
>>>>> -- minor change but better to change highlighting fragment defaults in a 
>>>>> major release but not critical.  ETA: Jan 17
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12901 Make 
>>>>> UnifiedHighlighter the default
>>>>> -- There are some overlaps between the highlighters but I definitely 
>>>>> think the UH is the best highlighter.  ETA Jan 21
>>>>> -- separate issue, TBD: removing the big/verbose configs for the other 
>>>>> highlighters from the default solrconfig.xml to keep it leaner. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Docker:
>>>>> * JIRA TBD, Java 17 runtime.  ETA Jan 17
>>>>> 
>>>>> Filter.java; remove/hide
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12336 "Remove Filter from 
>>>>> Solr"
>>>>> -- a contributor has something but is getting approval.  If we don't get 
>>>>> this in time, I could do something simple to just ensure the class isn't 
>>>>> public.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nested Docs:
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064 "Atomic/partial 
>>>>> updates to nested docs should not assume _route_ param is the root ID" 
>>>>> -- Debt/confusion to be removed. ETA 21 Jan
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modularizing:
>>>>> * Solrj-Zookeeper: ETA Jan 17
>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14660  HDFS (or Hadoop?)
>>>>> -- Waiting for the contributor to return to it.  See the issue for 
>>>>> discussion on what to do if it stagnates further.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ~ David Smiley
>>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Reply via email to