http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-12 21:19 ------- 'There's no extra hit from keeping the socket. We took a hit creating it and doing the query, we might as well try and get the answer.' well, there *is* a hit, if Net::DNS somehow "loses" the real response -- instead of getting the reply, we'd fall into a loop of waiting for a reply that will never arrive until we time out. I'm worried that something in Net::DNS would assume that once a bgsock receives a reply, that's the only reply it'll ever get. now that I think about it though, that seems unlikely (given this bug!) Theo: I don't think that's a problem. I'm not sure what you mean though. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
