https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6048
--- Comment #14 from Anthony Howe <[email protected]> 2009-01-22 04:10:44 PST --- Matt, Not sure I like the idea of a URIBL_SERVERBLOCKED creating an even higher score. Having the token appear in logs and/or headers is fine, you're assuming though that the system operator will be made aware of the issue quickly. Using milter-spamc or BarricadeMX, the recipient would never know unless they read the message headers. The SA reports are never added to the message body, only headers. The sender may or may not get a DSN with the report summary as some sites might choose to not to disclose the information out of fear it might aid spammers. So it isn't clear that a really high score will get administrator attention sufficiently quickly. Better to disable queries to the list and proceed with other SA tests, there are certainly enough other ones to fall back on. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
