https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6048
--- Comment #19 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2009-01-22 07:35:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > So it isn't clear that a really high score will get administrator attention > > sufficiently quickly. > > If all mail being tagged doesn't get their attention quickly, I'm not sure > what > will. I can't think of anything SA can do that would get attention faster. I don't know if that is appropriate at all. Bear in mind that in some situations, a sufficiently high score would result in the mail being bounced! If going over a URIBL query limit results in all mail coming in to your site bouncing, that's a very serious problem. :( I would be in favour of a well-known test endpoint: "blocked.multi.uribl.com". for most queries that would return "0.0.0.0" with a long TTL. for sites blocked due to too many queries, that would return "255.255.255.255" with a long TTL. These are very cacheable and would be extremely low-load. This provides a way for clients like SA to query and determine if a caller is overloading the servers; in that situation we can issue warnings, fire informational rules, log stuff to the syslogs etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
