https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7755
--- Comment #8 from Riccardo Alfieri <[email protected]> --- -- That is wrong. Rescoring *ANY* URIBL above the local threshold is a surefire way to boost false positives. -- I don't know about that, our public Virus Bulletin tests and results are out there, and the latest test had a pretty good spam catch rate (and mind you that we are *only* using our data and our plugin to do the test). The 3 FPs you see listed (out of a total of 273.861 email processed) I can tell you are specifically *my* fault because of an error in the setup (and they were really 2, since an email was repeated) -- For example, the mail sent *WITH YOUR BUG COMMENT* hit URIBL_DBL_SPAM, because you mentioned the miscreant domain in the body. -- Sure, but we are talking in a precise "market" niche. I am subscribed to at least a dozen of MLs that are involved in spam fighting and abuse response, and if I wouldn't have whitelisted them I'd probably get 10% of the total traffic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
