https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7755
--- Comment #9 from RW <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Riccardo Alfieri from comment #6) > That rescoring is done with a purpose, ie: > > Deep test the received chain and check if an IP is in XBL/SBL and adjust the > score accordingly. That is to check if the original sender ip is compromised > in some way (XBL and SBL have different listing policies, hence the > different scores) The chief problem is not the 1 point for deep XBL, but the reuse of existing rule names. They've been switched from extremely low FP to high FP rules. The problem with this is that people may have used these rules in local meta-rules or have redefined their scores. RCVD_IN_XBL has a default score of only 0.375, so is a good candidate for rescoring. IMO everyone should either increase that score or set it to zero. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
