I don't think that's true either, not yet. Being JVM-based with no native code, I just don't even think it would be common to assume it doesn't work and it apparently has. If you want to announce it, that's up to you.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:01 AM Tianhua huang <huangtianhua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Sean Owen, > Thanks for attention this. > I agree with you, it's probably not very appropriate to say 'support arm from > 3.0 release'. How about change to the word "Spark community supports fully > tests on arm from 3.0 release"? > Let's try to think about it from the user's point of view than > developer，users have to know exactly whether spark supports arm well and > wheter spark fully tests on arm. If we specify spark is fully tests on arm, I > believe users will have much more confidence to run spark on arm. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
