Yes, mirroring from CDN technically the same but we want to make sure
users know the link come from ASF domain =)

So we need to update the
http://spark.incubator.apache.org/releases/spark-release-0-8-0.html
link to download src and binary distributions.

- Henry

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep, we definitely need to just directly point people the location at
> apache.org where they can find the hashes. I just updated the release
> notes and downloads page to point to that site.
>
> I just wanted to point out that mirroring these through a CDN seems
> philosophically the same as mirroring through Apache, since in neither
> case do we expect the users to trust the artifact they download. We
> just need to be more explicit that we are, indeed, mirroring and
> explain that the trusted root is at apache.org
>
> - Patrick
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey we've actually distributed our artifacts through amazon cloudfront
>>> in the past (and that is where the website links redirect to).
>>>
>>> Since the apache mirrors don't distribute signatures anyways,
>>
>> True, but apache dist does. IOW, it is not uncommon for those
>> having an automated build/fetching systems to get bits from
>> one of the mirrors and then get the hashes directly from dist.
>>
>> In your current case, I don't think I know of a way to do that.
>>
>> Now, you may say that the current CDN you guys are you using
>> is functioning like a mirror -- well, I'd say that it needs to be
>> called out like one then.
>>
>> Otherwise, as a naive user I *really* have to guess where
>> to get the hashes.
>>
>>> what is the difference between linking to an apache mirror vs using a more
>>> robust CDN? If people want to verify the downloads they need to go to
>>> the apache root in either case.
>>>
>>> Is this just a cultural thing or is there some security reason?
>>
>> A bit of both I guess.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.

Reply via email to