Hi, Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note? Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>wrote: > Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release. > Let's wait for his reply > > On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote: > > > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something > > different than this. > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there > > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact > > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party > > > libraries in the binary jars. > > > > > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in > > > general@ list. > > > > > > - Henry > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> Hey Henry, > > >> > > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and > > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could > > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on > > >> the source. > > >> > > >> - Patrick > > >> > > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra < > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the > > >>> VOTE is for the source. > > >>> > > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern. > > >>> > > >>> - Henry > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra < > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the > > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory. > > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and > > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience. > > >>>> > > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify > > signatures. > > >>>> > > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys. > > >>>> > > >>>> - Henry > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell < > pwend...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and no 0 > > or -1 > > >>>>> votes. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> +1 (5 Total) > > >>>>> Matei Zaharia* > > >>>>> Nick Pentreath* > > >>>>> Patrick Wendell* > > >>>>> Prashant Sharma* > > >>>>> Tom Graves* > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 0 (0 Total) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -1 (0 Total) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> * = Binding Vote > > >>>>> > > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the > > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] > > >>>>> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release- > > >>>>> vote > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <e...@ooyala.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps + > > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if it speeds > up > > >>>>>> everyone's development time. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra < > > m...@clearstorydata.com > > >>>>>> >wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's what > > I've got > > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size. >
