Hi Rafa, all OK than start with a 1.0.0 and 0.12.1 release. I can help with the code base, but AFAIK only Fabian and Reto know all the necessary steps to forge a release.
If we want to have a binary release we need to create a new launcher that excludes all data bundles included none ASL compatible things - and yes - this will exclude all the OpenNLP models ... best Rupert On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I like the Idea of creating a roadmap. @Rafa would you be able to >> drive this process. >> > > Sure, no problem. The very first thing we need to do is to close release > 1.0. For that, probably Rupert is the most indicated person to say which > current issues must be included. I wouldn't add any other functionality > until releasing this version. We have to decide also how is going to be > released in terms of binaries resolving all the issues related with third > party resources like OpenNLP models. > > After that, a brainstorming should start for next releases. First, which > components are going to be deprecated. For the rest, we setup a roadmap > around desired functionality or feedback from the users. I can take a look > to Jira and harvest those tickets that are interesting for the future and > start closing old and deprecated ones. > > How that sound? > > >> >> I am around until end of Juli, after that I am on vacation for ~1 >> month. If possible I would like to have this sorted out before my >> vacation. >> >> best >> Rupert >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Hi Fabian, >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Fabian Christ < >> christ.fab...@googlemail.com >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> yes we have indeed the situation where we do not have a project owner >> >> who is doing some oversight of the project. I am the current chair of >> >> the project but also do not find the time to manage the project. I >> >> would have resigned as a chair if there was a person who would like to >> >> be in charge and become the shepherd of the project. >> >> >> > >> > Maybe it is easier for you and everyone after the reorganization. Most of >> > us have very limited time for Stanbol, but this might could change if we >> > are able to catch-up everything, get a clean release with the current >> > codebase, build a new roadmap with the feedback of everyone that is using >> > Stanbol in regular basis and wants to join the discussion. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Anything that addresses this issue is +1 from me. If there is someone >> >> standing up and would like to clean up - go for it. >> >> >> >> In my opinion we should shrink the code base a lot and remove anything >> >> that was not touched for two years. Same for the JIRA issues. Just >> >> keep a small Stanbol kernel around the enhancer that is manageable. We >> >> started Stanbol with a much larger team during a research project but >> >> today we have to focus. And Rafa is right that this should be part of >> >> roadmap planning. >> >> >> > >> > +1. I can help on this. I can also help with some ideas for the future >> and >> > start discussions around them. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Regarding a chat or meeting: We have to discuss this in the open on >> >> the mailing list. We have the credo that anything that was not >> >> discussed on the ML did not happen. So, just discuss the matters here >> >> and only move to chat or whatever if really necessary. >> >> >> > >> > ok. Let's see if we can bring together a great number of actual >> committers >> > for this. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Rafa >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Best >> >> - Fabian >> >> >> >> 2015-06-16 14:35 GMT+02:00 Dileepa Jayakody <dileepajayak...@gmail.com >> >: >> >> > +1 Rafa. I too would like to join the discussion. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Fabian, Rupert, >> >> >> >> >> >> I have been taking a look to the Stanbol Jira and certainly there is >> a >> >> >> great mess there. For example, there are a lot of issues opened more >> >> than >> >> >> one or two years ago. What do you think guys about having a session >> for >> >> >> properly organizing this?. We can meet at the IRC channel or wherever >> >> you >> >> >> consider and talk about releases, expectations, roadmap. I have the >> >> >> impression that there is a complete lack of planning for the >> project. I >> >> >> know that I'm not probably the most indicated person for saying this >> >> >> because I'm far away of being a daily contributor. But maybe we can >> >> >> motivate committers again by building a great backlog and planning >> >> properly >> >> >> where the project should go. I have been using Stanbol lately for two >> >> real >> >> >> uses cases and I could share with you my impressions and provide >> >> feedback >> >> >> as functionality that would have been nice to have while developing >> the >> >> >> projects. >> >> >> >> >> >> It would be great also to know how other Apache projects build their >> >> >> roadmap. Maybe we find a mirror to look at. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Rafa >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < >> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Fabian Christ <fchr...@apache.org >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > > here is my draft for the report. Anything to add? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Hi Fabian >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Nothing that is so important for adding to the Report. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Fabian Christ <fchr...@apache.org >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > > The project is doing well but on a slow level. Main issue at the >> >> moment >> >> >> > > may be that there is no one who is cutting releases from time to >> >> time. >> >> >> > > The last release was cut one year ago. The project is aware of >> this >> >> >> > > issue and is working on it. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thats very true! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Slow Progress ... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > * I updated most of the dependencies STANBOL-1419 (for both 0.12.1 >> and >> >> >> > trunk). So we are again using the newest Apache Sling Launcher, >> Apache >> >> >> > Felix. New Apache Sling logging with lock back support, ...) >> >> >> > * Added support for ixa-nerc - Named Entity Recognition models. >> They >> >> >> > provide much better quality models for OpenNLP. Languages: English, >> >> >> > Spanish, German, Italian and Dutch. >> >> >> > * I am also working together with Alfonso Noriega on adding support >> >> >> > for the Stanford NLP sentiment annotation. For Stanbol this will >> mean >> >> >> > that the Restful NLP engine will support Sentiment Annotations. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > An other issue are questions about the Contenthub and CMS Adatper >> that >> >> >> > we can not really handle as the original developers are no longer >> >> >> > active. During the dependency upgrades (STANBOL-1419) I noticed >> that >> >> >> > those components do not have any Integration tests. So while I >> fixed >> >> >> > all related module level issues (as reported by the unit tests) I >> was >> >> >> > unable to ensure that everything was working as intended at runtime >> >> >> > (as for all other components that do have integration tests). >> >> >> > >> >> >> > About Releases: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I am happy to help with releases. Best would be if I you Fabian >> could >> >> >> > show me everything I need to know to create releases by my own in >> the >> >> >> > future. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > best >> >> >> > Rupert >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >> >> >> > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >> ++43-699-11108907 >> >> >> > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> >> >> > | REDLINK.CO >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> .......................................................................... >> >> >> > | http://redlink.co/ >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Fabian >> >> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> | REDLINK.CO >> .......................................................................... >> | http://redlink.co/ >> -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/
