I would also be very interested. We use the entityhub component quite a bit at our institution, and I would be happy to be involved.
Aaron Coburn > On Jan 22, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would definitely be up for that! > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, 3:33 p.m. A. Soroka, <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: > >> Ditto. If there are other folks who would be interested in participating >> in something like this, now would be a good time to raise your voice! >> >> --- >> A. Soroka >> The University of Virginia Library >> >> >>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote: >>> >>> I think the "mandatory" documentation contribution is a great idea (and >>> very reasonable). I'd be happy to partake! >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I wouldn't mind to be involved in that but it would be almost >> "mandatory" >>>> to contribute some Developer Documentation as outcome of those meetings >>>> :-). @Rupert we specially need you here :-) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:09 PM A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall having >>>>> issues with the documentation initially and the only >>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>> >>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would >>>> be >>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>> >>>>> I second this! >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps (I know it's very difficult to organize synchronous time for a >>>>> globally-distributed group but perhaps) we could try to organize a boot >>>>> camp meeting on-line? In other words, those people who (like Andrew and >>>>> myself) would be willing to contribute as part of a larger effort could >>>> get >>>>> some virtual time with one or more committers/PMC members to take an >>>>> in-depth tour of the system from the developer point of view and hear >>>> about >>>>> the outstanding architectural issues, maybe start to figure out points >> of >>>>> contribution. >>>>> >>>>> I realize this would make a lot of demands on the committers involved, >>>> but >>>>> it might be a way to inject some fuel into the effort. >>>>> >>>>> Just an idea... >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> A. Soroka >>>>> The University of Virginia Library >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello! >>>>>> >>>>>> We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as part of >>>>> some >>>>>> of our data products. >>>>>> We do this via the REST API. >>>>>> Originally we were using the content hub to store all the documents >> but >>>>> saw >>>>>> higher than expected failures. >>>>>> The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content types >> / >>>>>> encoding. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. >>>>>> I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the only >>>>>> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. >>>>>> >>>>>> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would >>>> be >>>>>> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri < >>>>>> raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>> we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol very >>>>> flexible to >>>>>>> enhance content, specially those unstructured ones. >>>>>>> For that regards connections with other projects, we have done some >>>>>>> thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql backends for >>>> big >>>>>>> data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement enrichment of >>>>>>> existent document repositories, that's a common request. >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Raffaele. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>> Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for us to >> do >>>>> NLP >>>>>>>> and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move towards a >>>> nosql >>>>>>>> storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? Also, what >>>>>>> about >>>>>>>> upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? Anyway, >>>> great >>>>>>>> tool, really hope this doesn't die!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Antero >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, < >>>>>>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ...I participated >>>>>>>>>> also in the development of the Java client, so I could take the >>>>>>>>>> responsibility of bringing that one as well... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left the >>>>>>>>> Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a community >> point >>>>>>>>> of view, as an experienced Apache member. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its core, but >>>> as >>>>>>>>> its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to bring >>>>>>>>> everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a slightly >> less >>>>>>>>> focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active >>>> committers >>>>>>>>> and PMC members by involving them directly here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of people >>>> who >>>>>>>>> need similar functionality. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew Valencik >>>>>> >>>>>> Data Scientist >>>>>> >>>>>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter < >>>> http://twitter.com/valencik> >>>>> | >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> >>>>>> >>>>>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>>>>> < >>>>> >>>> >> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> Andrew Valencik >>> >>> Data Scientist >>> >>> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/valencik> >> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> >>> >>> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio >>> < >> http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f >>> >> >> >> >>
